| STANDARD | REVISED | |
| 3-6 WEEKS POST-OP | 72 HR WHOLE BODY SCAN, 30-100MCI ABLATION, REPEAT SCAN | 30-100MCI ABLATION, POST-TREATMENT SCAN |
| FOLLOW-UP IN LOW RISK PATIENTS | PERIODIC US, WHOLE BODY SCAN, AND TG | PERIODIC US, RHTSH STIMULATED TG |
| FOLLOW-UP IN HIGH RISK, OR WITH RESIDUAL TUMOR | PERIODIC US, SCAN, TG, RAI TREATMENT, POST THERAPY SCAN | TG,. US, PERIODIC RAI TREATMENT WITHOUT SCAN, AND POST-TREATMENT SCAN |
Whole body scans have usually been done using 131-I. Its 8 day half-life allows scanning at 48-72 hours after administration of the tracer dose, at which time circulating free iodide has been largely excreted, and abnormal tracer uptake is easily defined. 131-I also has an energetic and easily detected gamma-ray signal. A potential problem with 131-I scanning is "stunning" of visualized thyroid tissue, as described below. To avoid stunning, 123-I has been employed, since its short half-life (6 hours) leads to a great reduction in radiation to thyroid tissue (and the patients). Scans are typically done at 24 hours, when background counts are still elevated, but it is nevertheless reported to provide information satisfactory for treatment decisions(433a).
Whether or not to ablate residual thyroid tissue in patients
with "low risk" carcinoma, has remained a contentious and much debated
issue. The opposing schools of thought were recently presented by Mazzaferri and
Hay.
"It is
unlikely that many patients will forgo treatment after understanding their risk,
especially when total thyroidectomy and radioiodine (131I) therapy can reduce
the PTMC recurrence or persistence disease rate to zero. Preoperatively
diagnosed PTMC should be treated with total or near-total thyroidectomy,
regardless of tumor size. For very low-risk patients with unifocal PTMC smaller
than 1 cm that is removed by chance during surgery to treat benign thyroid
disease, lobectomy alone without 131I therapy may be sufficient therapy if there
are no concerning histologic features and no tumor extension beyond the thyroid,
metastases, history of head and neck irradiation, or positive family
history--any of which requires total or near-total thyroidectomy and remnant
ablation with 30 mCi." (Mazzaferri
EL. Management of low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer.
Endocr Pract. 2007
Sep-Oct;13(5):498-512.)
"The
outlook for patients with low-risk PTC is very optimistic, with rates at 30
postoperative years of only 1% for cause-specific mortality and less than 15%
for tumor recurrence at any site. The long-term results obtained by potentially
curative bilateral resection, appropriate regional lymph nodal excision, and
selective use of RRA are excellent. Realistically improving these acceptably low
rates for cause-specific mortality and tumor recurrence may be difficult."(
Hay ID. Management
of patients with low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma.
Endocr Pract. 2007
Sep-Oct;13(5):521-33)
As pointed
out by Cooper (Thyroid 17, p596, 2007) , some of the differences have to
do with use of differing tumor classification systems. Papillary cancers in
patients under age 45 over 4 cm, or with macroscopic extraglandular invasion, or
over age 45 with multifocal diseae or microscopic extraglandular invasion, and
follicular cancers if over 45 yrs and <1cm- are all placed in AJC version
6 Stage I, but are placed in Stage II using the NTCCSG classification.
Follicular cancers 1-2 cm in patients over age 45 are in AJC Stage I, but are in
NTCCSG Stage III. Obviously the two groups believe the specific tumors have
differing degrees of significance, thus leading to different therapeutic
recommendations.
It is possible to administer ablative 131-I doses outside of the hospital setting by using fractionated doses given on successive days, immediately after the diagnostic WBS. Czepczynski et al (440b) did diagnostic whole body scans 44-46 hours after a 111MBq oral dose, and patients were treated on the same day, and 24 hours later in a split dosage protocol. Patients (113) with DTC (29.3%) were treated with one (131)I dose of 2.2 GBq and 273 patients (70.7%) with fractionated doses (1.1 GBq + 1.1 GBq administered in 24 hour intervals. The early outcome of the initial therapy was evaluated 6-8 months later by radioiodine uptake test, thyroglobulin concentration, whole-body diagnostic scan, and neck ultrasound. No difference in measured parameters was found in the groups at the follow-up evaluation. In uncomplicated cases of DTC, therapy using a regimen of a fractionated dosage, seems equally effective as therapy with a single dose. No influence of stunning was observed in patients treated with a fractionated dosage, but the time interval between the doses was 24 hours.
The factors associated with ablation failure are not fully understood. In particular, it is not certain whether the use of doses higher than 3.70 GBq (100mCi) would result in any additional benefit, or whether there is a 'stunning' effect of the diagnostic dose of 131I on the subsequent ablation rate. A retrospective analysis was reported by Karman et al (440c) on all patients (n=389) with well-differentiated thyroid cancer treated between 1992 and 2001. The therapeutic dose was the only variable found to be associated with success (odds ratio, 1.96 per 1.85 GBq increment; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-3.46). The results confirmed the presence of a significant percentage of ablation failures (24.4%) despite the use of high ablative doses (3.70-7.40 GBq). Higher therapeutic doses are associated with higher rates of successful ablation, even when administered to patients with more advanced stages. Higher diagnostic doses were not associated with higher rates of ablation failure.
The utility of radioactive iodide treatment of patients with papillary and follicular cancer was recently reviewed in a series of articles by Wartofsky, Sherman, and Schlumberger and their associates. Schlumberger concludes that routine radioactive iodide ablation is not indicated in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinomas of less than 1.5 cm in diameter, and advocates restricting RAI ablation to patients with poor prognostic indicators for relapse or death (441). Wartofsky points out a secondary benefit of postoperative low dose 131I ablation in that, for many patients, it provides a high degree of certainty and peace of mind when subsequent scans are negative and TG is undetectable. Another argument for radioactive iodide ablation and early detection of any recurrence is the data presented by several groups, including Schlumberger and colleagues, that there is a reciprocal relationship between the success of cancer therapy and the size and duration of the lesions.
In patients with Stage II to IV disease, we proceed to destroy all residual thyroid and to treat demonstrable metastases if they can be induced to take up enough 131I. Use of 131I therapy is investigated in these patients, regardless of the histologic characteristics of the resected lesion, although significant uptake rarely is found in Hurthle tumors (442, 443) or in patients with anaplastic lesions. (Fig.18-16)
|
|
|
Figure 18-16. Management of radioactive iodide for thyroid ablation and cancer treatment. |
Preparation for 131-I ablation
The "classical" approach has been to induce hypothyroidism prior to the ablative dose in order to raise TSH and stimulate uptake of RAI in residual thyroid or tumor. This may be done by simply leaving the patient without T4 therapy for 3 weeks post op. Alternatively patients can be given thyroid hormone suppressive therapy for 6 weeks or so after operation, so that any malignant cells disseminated at the time of thyroidectomy will not be stimulated by TSH. The value of this measure is admittedly unknown. Patients then receive 25 µg L-T3 bid for 3 weeks, and therapy is then stopped for at 2-3 weeks to allow endogenous TSH (which may reach 20-60 µU/ml) to stimulate uptake of the 131I by the remaining fragments of thyroid tissue or metastatic lesions in the neck or elsewhere before proceeding with 131I therapy. The usual scanning dose is 2 mCi 131-I, and scans are read at 48 or 72 hours when body background has diminished. If TSH is sufficiently elevated the initial scan can reveal distant metastases as well as residual thyroid gland. If large thyroid tissue remnants are present, TSH may not become very elevated, but will do so after the first ablation dose. Patients with Class I and Class II disease under age 45 are given 30 mCi as an out-patient treatment. Older patients with Class II disease and patients with Class III or IV disease are given doses of 75-200 mCi as an inpatient treatment.
Whole body scans are obtained about 7 days after the ablative dose of 131I (or after therapeutic doses), since unsuspected metastasis may be visualized on scans at this time. Serum Tg is always measured at the time of 131-I therapy. At 24 hours after initial ablation, we replace hormone therapy and continue this therapy for 6-9 months
Some physicians proceed without prior scanning directly to 131I ablation 2-4 weeks after surgery and perform a post-therapy scan 5-7 days later. If this is done it is considered important to measure urinary iodine in order to prevent ineffective treatment. Presumed benefits of this approach are patient convenience, less expense, and avoidance of possible thyroid "stunning" by the scan dose. In fact stunning has not been demonstrated with the 2 mCi 131-I dose, although it may occur. Arguments for doing a pre-ablation scan include finding out the actual percent uptake of the treatment dose in the neck and elsewhere, establishing if in fact there is uptake, and recognizing disease that may dictate a larger initial dose. The final word on these different approaches is not in. Variations on this approach were studied by Pinchera's group (444),who compared induced hypothyroidism with rhTSH stimulation. The Pisa group found that either thyroid hormone withdrawal, or hormone withdrawal plus 2 doses of rhTSH, produced higher percentage uptakes and more frequent ablation with 30 mCi doses (in about 80 % of cases), compared to rhTSH alone. Although not yet an approved use, THYROGEN administration has been reported to be an effective preparation for post operative ablation as well as for subsequent scans (445).
Options in Follow-up scans and treatment- including recently described variations
The conventional preparation for follow-up scans has been to induce hypothyroidism in order to stimulate uptake of 131-I by residual thyroid tissue or tumor cells and production of TG. Several methods have used. Firstly, hormone therapy may simply be withdrawn 4 weeks. More commonly, triiodothyronine is given (25 ug bid) for three weeks (this induces mild hypothyroidism, and T3 disappears rapidly after withdrawal) and then T3 is omitted for 2-3 weeks. Children appear to develop adequate TSH elevation for treatment after two weeks without T4 therapy (445a). Recently a "HALF DOSE" protocol has been used, since it minimizes symptoms. Elevation of TSH in patients on T4 therapy by using injectable recombinant human TSH has been added to our options. (See below). Other options include omitting scans after initial ablation in patients deemed to be at low risk, and relying entirely on measurement of serum TG. Another option in patients known to have residual disease because of elevated baseline TG, is to give therapeutic 131-I without preliminary scanning. General plans for performing scans and reducing stable iodide intake during scanning are given below.
Six-9 months after initial treatment, patients are often again prepared for scanning. After initial ablation, little thyroid tissue is present, and patients can be conveniently prepared using the "half-dose" protocol (446). Half the usual dose of thyroxine is given for six weeks. TSH is tested in the fifth week, and if over 20 uU/ml, scanning is done in the sixth week, or preparation is prolonged if needed. On this protocol patients usually feel quasi-normal and conduct normal activities, in contrast to their function during withdrawal scans. On the half-dose protocol, FTI falls to bottom normal, and TSH on average reaches about 60uU/ml in the sixth week. Patients who start with TSH below 0.1uU/ml may take longer to reach a satisfactory level for scanning, which is generally considered to be with TSH at least 30uU/ml. Alternatively, patients are switched to 50 µg L-T3/day for 3 weeks. This medication is then stopped, and after 2-3 weeks imaging is again performed. Patients who are completely without hormone for >2 weeks become severely hypothyroid, and should be advised against driving an automobile or participating in any activity in which their slowed responses could cause danger.
The aim of the follow-up of patients with papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma is the early discovery of persistent or recurrent disease. This is possible through the use of serum thyroglobulin (Tg) determination or total body scanning with 131I (131I-TBS), or a combination of both tests. Both procedures, to be effective, require elevated serum TSH levels above some arbitrary figure such as 25 or 30 mU/L (447), obtained by withdrawing l-thyroxine (L-T4) suppressive therapy for 4 to 6 weeks, or by substituting the more rapidly metabolized triiodothyronine (L-T3) for thyroxine for 3 weeks, and then withdrawing it for 2-3 weeks, or the half-dose method noted above. Even if L-T3 substitution is used, patients may experience a wide range of hypothyroid signs and symptoms which may be severe and may result in a substantial impairment of the patients' lives and ability to work (448), and occasional tumor growth. Recombinant human TSH (Thyrogen) has been developed to meet the need for safe, adequate exogenous TSH stimulation in patients with papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma.
In vitro studies have shown that rhTSH can effectively stimulate cAMP production and the growth of human fetal thyroid cells. The in vivo biological efficacy of rhTSH was demonstrated in normal subjcts, in whom it is able to increase serum T4 and T3 concentrations and stimulate thyroidal radioiodine uptake. A single dose of 0.1mg rhTSH is a potent stimulator of thyroid function in normal subjects (449).
A first clinical trial of recombinant humand TSH (rhTSH- THYROGEN) (phase I/II) was completed in 1994 in 19 patients after a recent thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer (450). The encouraging results of this limited study were confirmed in a larger multicenter phase III study conducted between 1992 and 1995 in the USA in 127 patients (451) and in a second phase III trial, which included US and European centers (452). The results of this trial can be summarized as follows: scans were similar after rhTSH and thyroid hormone withdrawal in 92% of the patients, with no difference between the two dose regimens investigated. When the results of 131I WBS and post-rhTSH Tg levels were combined, the detection rate increased to 94%. Among the patients with persistent or recurrent disease, 80% had concordant scans, 4% had superior rhTSH scans and 16% had superior withdrawal scans. Interestingly, serum TG levels were detectable in 80% during thyroid hormone therapy and were detectable in all following either rhTSH stimulation or withdrawal of thyroid hormone treatment. However, the TG level reached after rhTSH stimulation was in general lower than that obtained after thyroid hormone withdrawal. Tissue RAI uptakes obtained in the patients undergoing hormone withdrawal were twice the values found after rhTSH, indicating that withdrawal provided a much greater stimulus to thyroid or tumor tissue. However, as noted, the diagnostic results were nearly equal. Quality of life was much better during rhTSH than during hypothyroidism induced by thyroid hormone withdrawal, and side effects were minimal, mainly consisting in mild and transient nausea or headache in less than 10% of patients. No patient has developed detectable anti-rhTSH antibodies, even after receiving repeated courses of rhTSH in successive clinical trials .All together these clinical trials have clearly shown that rhTSH is an effective and safe alternative to thyroid hormone withdrawal during the post-surgical follow-up of papillary and follicular thyroid cancer, although not as sensitive as scanning after hormone withdrawal in some patients. A few patients have been reported with metastases demonstrated on withdrawal scans that were
not evident on rhTSH scans (452.1).
In an important study, Frigo et al ablated thyroid remnants with 3.7 GBq 131-I in 10 patients with T4 withdrawal for 30 days, and 10 with rhTSH pre-treatment. Bone marrow radiation exposure was 0.1+/- 0.03 mGy/MBq (2 rads) in withdrawal patients and 0.06+/- 0.01 (1.2 rads) in rhTSH treated patients. Six to twelve months after 131-I administration, the withdrawal patients had a higher chromosome translocation rate. This study clearly suggests that by inducing a lower extrathyroid exposure, rhTSH reduces the potential risk of chromosomal aberrations associated with blood irradiation. Three important caveats must be kept in mind in reviewing the study. . Firstly, the significance of the translocations, and the small radiation dosage (a fraction of the dose given with one CAT scan) is uncertain, although no one can “favor” extra radiation. Secondly, if a “partial T4 dose “ pre-treatment had been used, the patients would not have been rendered hypothyroid, and probably would have similar responses to the rhTSH group.. Thirdly, the dose of 131-I given, 3.7GBq, is three times higher than the dose needed to ablate most patients. (Frigo A, Dardano A, Danese E, Davì MV, Moghetti P, Colato C, Francia G, Bernardi F, Traino C, Monzani F, Ferdeghini M Chromosome translocation frequency after radioiodine thyroid remnant ablation: a comparison between recombinant human thyrotropin stimulation and prolonged levothyroxine withdrawal. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009 Sep;94(9):3472-6.)
Recently a theoretical analysis was done to determine the cost-utility of rhTSH prior to ablation in the United States. Use of rhTSH yielded an incremental cost-utility of $52,554/QALY (95% confidence interval $52,058-53,050/QALY) (incremental societal cost of $1,365/patient; incremental benefit of 0.026 QALY/patient). Differences in cost are due to cost of rhTSH and differences in productivity loss (days off work). (Wang TS, Cheung K, Mehta P, Roman SA, Walker HD, Sosa JA. To stimulate or withdraw? A cost-utility analysis of recombinant human thyrotropin versus thyroxine withdrawal for radioiodine ablation in patients with low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer in the United States. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Apr;95(4):1672-80)
It has been found that Thyrogen
administration induces a reduction of serum vascular endothelial growth factor,
even in the absence of thyroid tissue (452a). The clinical significance of this
observation, if any, is unknown, but it does imply possible action of rhTSH on
receptors other than in thyroid tissue. Another unlikely by-product possibly
associated with rhTSH was reported by Berg et al, who observed development of
severe ophthalmopathy in a patient with disseminated thyroid cancer treated with
rhTSH and RAI while on retinoic acid (Berg
G, Andersson T, Sjodell L, Jansson S, Nystrom E. Development of
severe thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy in a patient with disseminated thyroid
cancer treated with recombinant human thyrotropin/radioiodine and retinoic
acid.Thyroid. 2005 Dec;15(12):1389-94).
Use of rhTSH in managing thyroid cancer has recently been
extensively reviewed (452b)
Follow - up treatment based on TG assays--
As assays for thyroglobulin (TG) have become more sensitive and reliable, measurement of TG assumes more and more importance in determining the management of patients followed after thyroidectomy and radioactive iodide ablation treatment for thyroid cancer. Serum TG levels, in the absence of antibodies interfering in the assay, correlate well with tumor burden, although detectable tumor may well be present even in the presence of negative TG assays in individuals who are on replacement thyroid hormone (453). Pacini et al report that, in a retrospective study of 315 patients who had undetectable serum TG in the hypothyroid state at the time of the first control body scan after thyroid ablation, no useful information was provided by the body scan. Thus they propose that diagnostic 131I whole body scans can be avoided in patients with undetectable levels of TG on T4 after initial ablation, and that the patients can be monitored with clinical examination, ultrasound, and serial TG measurements on thyroxin treatment. However, some concerns may be noted. The TG assay used in their study recognized a value of < 3 ng/ml as "undetectable". Also, of the 90 patients in the study with thyroid bed RAIU, 54 received a second course of treatment, and seven received two additional courses. This seems to question the recommended approach (454). In a second study they found that an undetectable TG, when hypothyroid at the time of the first control scan after ablation, predicted complete and permanent remission. They propose that subsequent 131-I scanning is unneeded, and follow-up clinically and by TG assays while on thyroxin, would be sufficient (455).
However a negative TG (with negative antibodies) after initial ablation is
not fool proof. Phan et al observed that 8 out of 94
(8.5%) patients with initially negative Tg and TgAb showed persistent/recurrent
disease. Tg and TgAb negativity at the time of ablation is not a predictive
determinant for future recurrent status(455a).
Castagna et al
evaluated the utility of a second rhTSH-Tg in DTC patients 2-3 yr after their
first evaluation. The second rhTSH-Tg was informative in patients who had
detectable stimulated Tg in the first exam but not in those who had undetectable
Tg at the first test. They suggest rhTSH-Tg should be repeated only in patients
who have had a positive first rhTSH-Tg and negative imaging(455b).
Mazzaferri and Kloos studied retrospectively 107 patients who were “clinically free of disease” and had undetectable or very low serum TG levels during thyroid hormone therapy. The TG levels on treatment were all 1 ng/ml or less, and 95% were under 0.5 ng/ml in their assay, which was a commercial (Nichols Institute) chemoluminescent antibody assay. In response to the administration of two doses of recombinant TSH and assay of TG on samples taken on the fifth day, 20% were found to have a value above 2, with values ranging from above 2 up to 18 ng/ml. Twenty percent of the patients who had low or undetectable TGs had elevation above 2 ng/ml after rhTSH stimulation, and many of these patients ended up with therapy. However, the authors found that radioactive iodide whole body scans often failed to localize the source of the elevated TG, which was found after post-therapy scans or by other imaging methods. This study suggests that even with a TG level below 1 while on replacement therapy, persistent disease may sometimes be present and be detected by stimulation using recombinant TSH or thyroid hormone withdrawal (456). Wartofsky comments on these studies and supports the idea that TG testing, both on suppression and after TSH stimulation, can help in determining therapy. He suggests that, in patients with a serum TG < 0.5 ng/ml on suppression, and in a low risk category, that stimulation by recombinant TSH and measurement of TG, rather than scanning, is satisfactory. If the TG remains < 1, the patients can be evaluated annually with such a stimulation test. In patients with slightly higher TGs, up to 2, he suggests measuring a recombinant TSH stimulated TG, and scanning. In patients with higher TGs, he suggests that thyroid hormone withdrawal and radioactive iodide treatment, without initial scanning, may be appropriate (457-459).
In a study done by the rTSH-Stimulated Thyroglobulin Study group and published in 2002 (NR22), a cutoff level of 1ng/ml for stimulated TG was taken as the safe level for patients with low risk. This group would presumably be monitored by repeat rTSH stimlated TG assays rather than scans. It is of interest that in this study 14 of the patients with stimulated TG <2ng/ml underwent isotope scanning and 9
were positive. These "could be interpreted as false negative" tests. Five had uptake outside the thyroid bed. This group suggests that patients with stimulated TG above 2 would have subsequent thyroid hormone withdrawal and possible 131-I therapy without scanning.
A recent “consensus” statement by a group of thyroidologists also supports the categorization of patients into high and low risk groups, and use of TG as described above for following low risk patients (459a).
David et al )459b) also support the primacy of rhTSH-stimulated TG, and US, in follow
up, and indicate that any rise of TG after stimulation should raise suspicion of
persistent or recurrent disease. Although 131-I scans showed uptake in lung,
bone or mediastinum in 11 of 27 patients who had TG > 5ng/ml after stimulation,
they found that TSH-whole body scans "provides little adjunctive information".
As the sensitivity of TG assays increases, the need for
rTSH stimulated-TG assays will diminish. Smallridge et al report that patients
with a post–op and post-ablation suppressed TG of 0.1ng/ml or less, rarely
elevate >2ng/ml with rTSH stimulation. The authors suggest monitoring with
measurement of suppressed TG and US, and reserving more extensive review for
patients who elevate TG to a detectable level during suppression therapy, or
develop abnormal nodes(459d).

This figure shows their results from rTSH stimulated TG assays in patients whose
basal suppressed TG was < 0.1ng/ml in a sensitive assay. Only one of 46 patients
elevated TG significantly. Obviously this approach depends on the availability
of a highly sensitive and reliable TG assay.
Interestingly, Bachelot et al (459c) point out that neither
serum TG (with sensitive assay) nor 131-I body scan can be considered entirely
reliable for indicating the absence of disease in patients previously treated by
ablative RAI. However when both are negative, the risk of persistent
disease is minimal.
While these studies clearly describe current trends in approach to therapy, utilizing sensitive TG assays and recombinant TSH, it probably will take some time and more studies before most thyroidologists are willing to forego radioactive iodide scans, at the time of the initial ablation and later on in follow-up. There is no evidence that 2 mCi scans cause tumor stunning, and scanning clearly does provide useful information in many patients on disease localization, presence of residual thyroid in the neck, or even depressed uptake from iodide contamination at the time of the scan. Many thyroidologists will be reluctant to administer large doses of radioactive iodide (100 mCi or more) in therapy, without having a clear idea of where the isotope may go (460, 461).
However it is certain that clinicians are placing more reliance on TG assays and
US during followup, especially in low risk patients. Whether this will be come standard after the first ablation, or as is more common now, after 1 or 2 negative scans, is less clear. Clinicians may also be reluctant to accept the approach of administering large therapeutic does of 131-I based solely on elevated TG values, above 2 or 5ng/ml, in the absence of prior scanning, considering potential dangers, cost, uncertainty of distribution of the isotope, or whether there is any RAIU at all. We note that although not yet approved for this use, Thyrogen has been shown to be effective for 131-I therapy of residual or metastatic disease (462)
Criteria for identification of neck nodes that might harbor tumor have been
presented by Schlumberger and coworkers.
Cystic appearance, hyperechoic punctuations, loss of hilum, and peripheral
vascularization can be considered as major ultrasound criteria of LN malignancy.
LNs with cystic appearance or hyperechoic punctuations are highly suspicious of
malignancy. LNs with a hyperechoic hilum should be considered
benign.
Peripheral vascularization has the best sensitivity-specificity compromise.
Round shape, hypoechogenicity, and the loss of hilum taken as single criteria
are not specific enough to suspect malignancy. (Leboulleux
S,
Girard E,
Rose M,
Travagli JP,
Sabbah N,
Caillou B,
Hartl DM,
Lassau N,
Baudin E,
Schlumberger M
Ultrasound criteria of malignancy for cervical lymph nodes in patients followed
up for differentiated thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007
Sep;92(9):3590-4)
Follow- up scans (Table 18-7,8)
It is usual to perform whole body imaging with the gamma scintillation camera at 48 and 72 hours after administration of 2-4 mCi 131I. The 48-hour study is done so that metastases showing a relatively active turnover of iodine will not be missed, to shorten the study if possible, and to allow early ordering of isotope. The 72-hour imaging is technically superior, since the background iodide is almost entirely excreted by this time. Isotope typically remains in the sinuses even at the 72 hour scan, and usually some is seen in stomach, intestine, and bladder. Accumulation outside the thyroid bed, and not in one of the areas noted, indicates metastatic disease. However occasionally false positive uptake is seen in esophagus, various cysts, Meckel’s diverticuli, and elsewhere (463). In whole body scanning there is a definite advantage to the use of the gamma camera with multiaperture parallel holes, over a diverging collimator. By comparing the counting rate over a metastasis with a known standard, the percentage uptake of the dose can be computed. The gamma camera is essential for this procedure since, with the multiaperture
parallel collimation described, the counting rate is essentially distance
independent, as compared to the usual broad-field thyroid uptake collimator in
which distance is critical. Using this technique, it is possible to measure
easily the exact percentage of dose retention in specific areas at 48-72 hours.
The method is much simpler and more accurate than measuring isotope retention by
collecting urinary 131I, and for this writer, constitutes an essential part of
every whole body scan.
STUNNING FROM "TRACER" RAI-
The amount of 131I used for scanning varies from 2-10 mCi, in various clinics, or even larger amounts. Clearly the larger doses detect more lesions, but this rarely alters treatment plans. More importantly, doses of 5-10 mCi have been shown to decrease tumor uptake of the subsequent treatment dose -- to "stun" the tumor (464). The exact importance of this phenomena is uncertain, but use of a 2 mCi dose
has seemed to be a reasonable compromise.
A recent study by Lassmann et al (464a) call this
assumption into question, since they found that even a 2mCi scan dose
reduced RAIU by up to 50% in a second procedure done 6 weeks later. This study
was carefully performed on a few patients, but it is possible that prolonged
stimulation of the thyroid by elevated TSH may have adversely altered
iodide kinetics in the remnants during the second RAIU proceedure. Although a reduction of uptake after prior low dose scans has been reported, it is uncertain that this limits the effectiveness of treatment. It was recently reported that ablation rates were equal in individuals who had, or had not, received scans prior to their treatment dose of 131-I (465).
Elevation of TSH above 25-30uU/ml by hormone withdrawal or rhTSH is the prime
determinate in successful scanning.
Ingestion of large amounts of iodide, or exposure to contrast dye within 6 (or more) weeks, can prevent RAIU. Uptake can be enhanced by prescribing a low iodine diet, and this should be employed for at least two weeks before scanning and therapy. (Table 18-7). It is useful to give magnesium citrate to induce bowel emptying prior to the scan .
As discussed above, the value of routine follow-up diagnostic scans has been challenged by Cailleux et al, who suggest that such scans rarely give information of value in patients who have TG < 1 after thyroid ablation (465.1) They suggest testing TG after thyroid hormone withdrawal or rhTSH, and directly treating those with TG above 10 by administration of 100mCi 131-I. This concept is of interest and awaits further examination, but has obvious problems as noted.
HIGH DOSE RAI THERAPY FOR INVASIVE OR METASTATIC DISEASE
Efficacy and morbidity
of high activity I therapy was assessed in 38 patients with locally
advanced or metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer (16 follicular, 20
papillary, one Hurthle cell, one insular)(465a). Patients were treated with high activity
radioiodine therapy (9 GBq, 243 mCi) as the cancers had previously not responded to
standard activities (5.5 GBq). After high activity treatment, 9.7% of patients
suffered grade 3 and 3.2% suffered grade 4 WHO haematological toxicity.
Significant salivary gland morbidity was observed (30% dry mouth, 27% salivary
swelling). In this study repeated treatment with high activity (9 GBq)
131-I
in patients with advanced differentiated thyroid carcinoma appeared to be of no
apparent benefit and lead to late morbidity.
However, other investigators
have differing results.
A
retrospective analysis was conducted by orn et al (465b) on 124 differentiated thyroid cancer
patients who underwent dosimetric evaluation using MIRD methodology over a
period of 15 y. One hundred four RAI treatments were performed. A complete
response at metastatic deposits was attained with absorbed doses of >100 Gy. No
permanent BM suppression was observed in patients who received absorbed doses of
<3 Gy to BM. The maximum administered dose was 38.5 GBq (1,040 mCi) with the BM
dose limitation. Dosimetry-guided RAI treatment allowed administration of the
maximum possible RAI dose to achieve the maximum therapeutic benefit. Estimation
of tumor dose rates helped to determine the curative versus the palliative
intent of the therapy.