Assay of Thyroid Hormones and Related Substances

Last Updated:

1. Introduction

Over the past forty years, improvements in the sensitivity and specificity of thyroid testing methodologies have dramatically impacted clinical strategies for detecting and treating thyroid disorders. In the 1950s, only one thyroid test was available – an indirect estimate of the serum total (free + protein-bound) thyroxine (T4) concentration, using the protein bound iodine (PBI) technique (1,2). Since 1970, technological advances in radioimmunoassay (RIA) (3-6), immunometric assay (IMA) (7,8) and more recently liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methodologies (9-12) have progressively improved the specificity, reproducibility and sensitivity of thyroid testing methods (13,14). Currently, serum-based immunoassays and LC-MS/MS techniques are available for measuring the total and free thyroid hormones, Thyroxine (T4) and Triiodothyronine (T3) concentrations, as well as the pituitary thyroid stimulator, Thyrotropin (Thyroid Stimulating Hormone, TSH) and the thyroid hormone precursor protein, Thyroglobulin (Tg) (12,15-18). In addition, measurements can be made of the thyroid hormone binding proteins, Thyroxine Binding Globulin (TBG), Transthyretin (TTR)/Prealbumin (TBPA) and Albumin (18). The recognition that autoimmunity represents a major cause of thyroid dysfunction has led to the development of tests for the detection of thyroid autoautoantibodies such as thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPOAb), thyroglobulin antibodies (TgAb) and TSH receptor antibodies (TRAb) (13,19-24). Currently, thyroid tests are performed primarily on serum specimens using manual or automated immunoassay methods employing specific antibody reagents directed at these ligands (13,25) or LC-MS/MS techniques used to measure free hormone moeities (FT4 and FT3) in dialysates and ultrafiltrates (9,10,26-29) or Thyroglobulin after alkylation and trypsinization (12,17). However, sensitivity, specificity and standardization issues still result in substantial between-method variability for many of these tests (8,12,23,28,30-33). To address this issue, new performance standards are being established by the professional organizations as well as technological advancements undertaken by instrument manufacturers (10,13,33-36). This chapter is designed to give an overview of the current status and limitations of the thyroid testing methods most commonly used in clinical practice and as recommended by current guidelines (13,34,37-40).

2. Total Thyroid Hormone Measurements (TT4 and TT3)

Thyroxine (T4) circulates approximately 99.97% bound to the plasma proteins: TBG (60-75%), TTR/TBPA (15 -30%) and Albumin (~10%). In contrast, approximately 99.7% of Triiodothyronine (T3) is protein-bound, primarily to TBG (18,27,41). Total (free + protein-bound) concentrations of the thyroid hormones (TT4 and TT3) circulate at nanomolar concentrations and are considerably easier to measure than the free hormone moieties (FT4 and FT3) that circulate in the picomolar range. The serum TT4 measurement has evolved by the development of a variety of technologies over the past four decades. However, despite changes in methodology from PBI in the 1950s, to competitive protein binding assays in the 1960s, to RIA in the 1970s and now LC-MS/MS methods, it has remained in all its forms a remarkably robust determination (Figure 1) (42-48). It is primarily for this reason that recent studies suggest employing total rather than free T4 as the preferred method for assessing thyroid status in pregnancy and critical illness [Section 3C(ii)] (40,42,49). Recently, primary T4 and T3 calibrator standards have become available, and measurements based on LC-MS/MS have further improved the standardization of these tests (10,28). Most commonly, TT4 and TT3 concentrations are measured by competitive non-isotopic immunoassay methods performed on automated platforms that use enzymes, fluorescence or chemiluminescent molecules as signals (14,25)(27). Total hormone methods require the inclusion of inhibitors, such as 8-anilino-1-napthalene-sulphonic acid, to block hormone binding to serum proteins in order to facilitate hormone binding to the antibody reagent (50-53). Serum TT3 method development has paralleled that of TT4. However, the ten-fold lower TT3 concentration presents a significant sensitivity and precision challenge despite the use of higher specimen volumes (3,54-61). Between-method variability for measuring total hormones (TT4 and TT3) has now been lowered by the use of highly purified preparations of crystalline L-thyroxine and L-triiodothyronine and by establishing reference LC-MS/MS techniques (28,30,61). Currently, observed assay variability most likely relates to matrix differences between calibrators and patient sera and the efficiency of the blocking agent employed by different manufacturers (30,58,62,63).

firgure 1

A. Clinical Utility of TT4 and TT3 Measurements

TThe diagnostic accuracy of total hormone measurements would be proportional to that of free hormone tests if all patients had similar binding protein concentrations (18,27,64). For example, a recent study has reported that a screening cord blood TT4 < 7.6 ug/dL (< 98 nmol/L) may serve as a valid screening test for congenital hypothyroidism (65). Unfortunately, many conditions commonly encountered in clinical practice are associated with TBG abnormalities that distort the proportionality of the total to free thyroid hormone relationship (Table 1). Additionally, some patients have thyroid hormone binding albumins (dysalbuminemias), thyroid hormone autoantibodies, or are taking drugs that render total hormone measurements diagnostically unreliable [Table 1 & Section 3E] (14,66-70). Consequently, TT4 and TT3 measurements are rarely used as stand-alone tests, but are typically employed in conjunction with a direct TBG measurement or an estimate of binding proteins [i.e. a thyroid hormone binding ratio test, THBR, [Section 3Ba(ii)] used to calculate a free hormone index (FT4I or FT3I). This index approach effectively corrects for the most commonly encountered abnormalities in thyroid hormone binding proteins that distort total hormone measurements [Section 3Ba] (42,71,72).


(a) TT4 and TT3 Reference Ranges

Although total T4 reference ranges vary to some extent depending on the methods employed, they have approximated 58 to 160 nmol/L (4.5-12.5 µg/dL) for more than four decades (Figure 1) (42). Currently, there is renewed interest in using TT4 measurements in preference to FT4 estimate tests to monitor pregnancy, when the non-pregnant reference range is adjusted by a factor of 1.5 to compensate for the predictable TBG elevation (40,42,73-77). As with TT4, serum TT3 values are method dependent to some extent and have reference ranges approximating to 1.2 – 2.7 nmol/L (80 –180 ng/dL) (59). In a recent study, simultaneous measurement of TT4 and TT3 in serum using LC/MS/MS reported comparable values to TT4 and TT3 immunoassay (48). LC/MS/MS measurement of TT4 and TT3 has also established values for the three trimesters of pregnancy (78).

3. Free Thyroid Hormone Tests (FT4 and FT3)

The impetus to develop free hormone tests has been the high frequency of binding-protein abnormalities encountered in clinical practice, especially the high TBG state of pregnancy (Table 1). In accord with the free hormone hypothesis, it is believed that the minute free fraction of hormone (0.02% versus 0.2% for FT4 versus FT3, respectively) is responsible for biologic activity at the cellular level (18,64,79). It follows that free hormone measurements will reflect the physiological effects of thyroid hormones better than total hormone concentrations when binding proteins are abnormal (18). Free hormone methods fall into two categories – direct methods that employ a physical separation of the free from protein-bound hormone, and estimate tests that either (a) calculate an free hormone “index” from a TBG estimate and measurement of total hormone or, (b) use an immunoassay that employs an antibody to sequester a small amount of the total hormone purportedly proportional to the free hormone concentration. It is important to recognize that no free hormone test is universally valid in all clinical situations. Index tests (FT4I and FT3I) as well as FT4 and FT3 immunoassays are all protein-dependent to some extent and most are prone to under- or overestimate FT4 in patients with significant abnormalities in thyroid hormone binding proteins (11,26,32,67,80-84). Even direct methods that employ equilibrium dialysis or ultrafiltration [Section 3A] are not immune from technical problems relating to dilution, adsorption, temperature or the influence of endogenous binding protein inhibitors (85-88). Although the diagnostic accuracy of free hormone methods cannot be predicted either from a method’s classification or by an in-vitro test of technical validity such as dilution (27,83,89-91), the superior log/linear TSH/FT4 relationship seen with direct FT4 methods (ultrafiltration followed by LC-MS/MS) highlights the inferiority of current FT4 immunoassays (11,92,93).

A. Direct FT4 and FT3 Methods

Direct free hormone methods employ equilibrium dialysis (10,95-97), ultrafiltration (9,11,86,98-101) or gel filtration (102) to separate the exceeding small amount of free hormone from the dominant protein-bound moiety. Because these techniques are technically demanding, inconvenient and expensive, they are typically only readily available in reference laboratories (27,103). Despite being considered as reference methods, equilibrium dialysis and ultrafiltration techniques can be prone to inaccuracies causing under- or overestimate or FT4 due to binding inhibitors in the specimen, dilution, pH, adsorption errors or temperature sensitivity (32,86-88,104-107). Direct free hormone methods are primarily used to evaluate the thyroid status of unusual patients displaying FT4 immunoassay values that appear discordant with TSH. Direct methods are also used as a reference for assigning calibrator values for FT4 immunoassay tests [discussed in Section 3Bb] (10,108).

(a) Equilibrium Dialysis

Early equilibrium dialysis methods used I-131 and later I-125 labeled T4 tracers to measure the free T4 fraction which, when multiplied by a total hormone measurement, gave an estimate of the free hormone concentration (95). Subsequently, symmetric dialysis, in which serum is dialyzed without dilution or employing a near-physiologic medium was used to overcome dilution effects (85,87,109). By the early 1970s higher affinity T4 antibodies (>1×1011 L/mol) and high specific activity T4-I125 tracers were used to sensitize RIA methods to directly measure FT4 and FT3 in dialyzates and ultrafiltrates (6,32,47,97,98,103,110-112). Subsequent improvements employed more physiologic buffer diluents and an improved dialysis cell design (87,112). Recently, LC/MS/MS has been adopted as the international reference method for the measuring free T4 concentrations of dialysates and ultrafiltrates (10,11,28,107,108).

(b) Ultrafiltration Methods

A number of recent studies have used ultrafiltration to remove protein-bound T4 prior to LC/MS/MS measurement of FT4 in the ultrafiltrate (92,107,113,114). Direct FT4 measurements that employ ultrafiltration are sometimes higher than seen with equilibrium dialysis because ultrafiltration avoids dilution effects (100). Furthermore, ultrafiltration is not influenced by dialyzable inhibitors of T4-protein binding that can be present in conditions such as non-thyroidal illness (NTI) (100). However, ultrafiltration can be prone to error if there is failure to completely exclude protein-bound hormone and/or there is adsorption of hormone onto the filters, glassware and tubing (32,86,101). In addition, ultrafiltration is temperature sensitive such that ultrafiltration performed at ambient temperature (25°C) will report FT4 results that are 67 percent lower than ultrafiltration performed at 37°C (88,113). A good correlation between direct FT4 measurements using equilibrium dialysis versus ultrafiltration prior to LC/MS/MS has been shown (113).

(c) Gel Absorption Methods.

Some early direct FT4 methods used Sephadex LH-20 columns to separate free from bound hormone before eluting the Free T4 from the column for measurement by a sensitive RIA. However, because of a variety of technical issues, assays based on this methodologic approach are now rarely used (27,102).

B. Indirect FT4 and FT3 Estimate Tests

The majority of FT4 and FT3 methods only estimate free hormone. FT4 and FT3 Estimate Tests use either two-test “index” approach or an immunoassay “sequestration” method (9,27,83,103,115,116). Despite manufacturers claims, all current FT4 and FT3 estimate tests are binding-protein dependent to some extent. In fact, a recent study has shown that FT4 immunoassays correlate better with total than free T4 concentrations although this conclusion has been disputed (81,115-117).

(a) Two-Test Index Methods (FT4I and FT3I)

Free hormone index (FT4I and FT3I) methods are typically based on a simple calculation that mathematically corrects the total hormone concentration for the influence of abnormal binding proteins, primarily TBG. These indexes have been used to estimate free hormone concentrations for more than 40 years and require two separate measurements (118,119). The first measurement is the total hormone concentration (TT4 or TT3) [Section 2], the second measurement an assessment of the binding protein concentration using either (i) a direct TBG immunoassay, (ii) a Thyroid Hormone Binding Ratio (THBR) or “Uptake” test or (iii) an isotopic determination of the free hormone fraction (27,80,120,121).

(i) TBG Immunoassays Despite reports that indexes employing THBR in preference to direct TBG appear to be diagnostically superior (122), free hormone indexes calculated using direct TBG measurement (TT4/TBG) may offer improved diagnostic accuracy over the use of THBR when the total hormone concentration is abnormally high (i.e. hyperthyroidism) or when drug therapies interfere with THBR tests (70). However, the TT4/TBG index is not independent of the TBG concentration, nor does it correct for Albumin or Transthyretin binding protein abnormalities (Table 1) (71,72,80,123,124).

(ii) Thyroid Hormone Binding Ratio (THBR) / “Uptake” Tests

The first “T3 uptake” tests developed in the 1950s employed the partitioning of T3-I131 tracer between the plasma proteins in the specimen and an inert scavenger (red cell membranes, talc, charcoal, ion-exchange resin or antibody) (27,125-127). The “uptake” of T3 tracer onto the scavenger provided an indirect, reciprocal estimate of the TBG concentration of the specimen. Initially, T3 uptake tests were reported as percent uptakes (free/total tracer). Typically, sera with normal TBG concentrations had approximately 30 percent of the T3 tracer taken up by the scavenger. During the 1970s methods were refined by replacing I131-T3 tracers by I125-T3, calculating uptakes based on the ratio between absorbent and total minus absorbent counts, and expressing results expressed as a ratio with normal sera having an assigned value of 1.00 (120). Historically, the use of T3 as opposed to T4 tracer was made for practical reasons. These related to the ten-fold lower the affinity of TBG for T3 versus T4 that facilitated a higher percentage of T3 tracer being taken up by the scavenger and allowing lower isotopic counting times.  Because current methods use non-isotopic T4 or T3 analogs, counting time is no longer an issue.  THBR methods based on T4 binding are probably more appropriate for correcting for T4-binding protein effects, but this issue has not been extensively studied (128). Although THBR tests are all to some degree TBG dependent, they usually produce normal FT4I and FT3I values when TBG abnormalities are mild (i.e. pregnancy and estrogen therapy) (42,80,118,119,129). However, these tests often fail to normalize FT4I and FT3I values when euthyroid patients have grossly abnormal binding proteins such as congenital TBG extremes, Familial Dysalbuminemic Hyperthyroxinemia (FDH), thyroid hormone autoantibodies, non-thyroidal illness (NTI) or medications that directly or indirectly influence thyroid hormone binding to plasma proteins (27,67-70,80,83,129-139).

(iii) Isotopic Index Methods

The first free hormone tests developed in the 1960s were indexes calculated from the product of the free hormone fraction, measured isotopically by dialysis, and TT4 measured by PBI and later RIA (95,121,140). These early isotopic detection systems were technically demanding and included paper chromatography, electrophoresis, magnesium chloride precipitation and column chromatography (95,111,141-143). The free fraction index approach was later extended to ultrafiltration and symmetric dialysis, the latter measuring the rate of transfer of isotopically-labeled hormone across a membrane separating two chambers containing the same undiluted specimen (67,98,100,109,140,144,145). Ultrafiltration and symmetric dialysis had the advantage of eliminating dilution effects that influenced tracer dialysis values (85,87). However, free hormone indexes calculated using an isotopic free fraction are not completely independent of the TBG concentration and furthermore are influenced by tracer purity and the buffer matrix employed (81,112,141,142,146,147).

(iv) The Clinical Utility of Two-Test Index Methods

The two-test FT4I index approach has been preferred to free hormone immunoassay methods for monitoring pregnant patients and hospitalized patients with NTI (13,42,148). This is because the binding protein abnormalities present in pregnancy and NTI can cause method-specific abnormalities in FT4 immunoassay values such that the reference ranges for non-pregnant ambulatory subjects do not apply (42,148-150). In contrast, the non-pregnant ambulatory FT4I reference range applies both to pregnancy and hospitalized patients with NTI (42,76,150,151).

(b) Free Thyroid Hormone Immunoassay Methods (FT4 and FT3)

Currently, most clinical laboratories use automated immunoassays to estimate serum FT4 and FT3 concentrations (25). These methods are calibrated using gravimetric standards or calibrators with values assigned by a direct reference method [Section 3A] (6,10,89). Free hormone immunoassays are based on the principle of using a specific antibody to sequester a small amount of the total hormone such that the fractional occupancy of antibody binding sites is determined by the free hormone concentration (27,152,153). The key to the validity of these methods is to use conditions that maintain the free to protein-bound hormone equilibrium and minimize dilution effects that weaken the influence of any endogenous inhibitors that may be present in the specimen (79,85,87,109,154). The actual proportion of total hormone sequestered (1-3%) varies with the methodologic design but greatly exceeds the actual free hormone concentration (6,155). Unfortunately, current free hormone immunoassays, especially FT3, appear to be more variable and less reliable than total hormone measurements (63,90,156). Considerable confusion still surrounds the nomenclature of FT4 tests and controversy continues regarding the technical validity of the measurements themselves, and their clinical utility in pathophysiologic conditions associated with abnormal binding proteins (Table 1) (6,14,27,83,115,116). Since the original one-step “analog” tests became available in the 1970s, the term “analog” has become mired in confusion (27,83,115,116,155). Despite improvements, current free hormone immunoassays still appear sensitive to alterations in serum albumin and abnormal binding proteins as well as certain drugs, high free fatty acid (FFA) levels or hormone binding inhibitors believed to be present in sera from patients with non-thyroidal illnesses (NTI) (14,67,84,91,115-117,146,157-160). In fact, a recent study has shown that FT4 immunoassay values correlate with both TBG and albumin concentrations and not inversely with TSH resulting in discordances between FT4 measured by immunoassays and direct methods (11,93). In contrast, a strong inverse log/linear TSH/FT4 relationship and no TBG or albumin correlations were seen when using a direct LC/MS/MS method (11). Three general approaches have been used to develop FT4 and FT3 immunoassay methods: (i) two-step labeled hormone; (ii) one-step labeled analog; and (iii) labeled antibody tests (27,83).

(i) Two-Step, Labeled-Hormone/Back-Titration FT4 and FT3 Methods

The two-step approach was first developed by Ekins and colleagues in the late 1970s and is still used for some procedures (27,83,89,91,161-164). Two-step methods typically employ immobilized T4 or T3 antibody (for FT4 and FT3 immunoassays, respectively) to sequester a small proportion of total hormone from a diluted serum specimen without disturbing the original free to protein-bound equilibrium. After removing unbound serum constituents by washing, a labeled probe (125-I T4 or macromolecular T4 conjugate) is added to quantify unoccupied antibody-binding sites that are inversely related to the free hormone concentration (26,83). After washing, the amount of label bound to the solid-phase antibody is quantified (27,83,137,157,165,166).

(ii) One-Step, Labeled Hormone-Analog FT4 and FT3 Methods

Classic “one-step” methods use hormone analogs having molecular structures that claim to be non-reactive with serum proteins but able to compete with free hormone for unoccupied antibody-binding sites (83,89,152). The principle underpinning these methods is that hormone-analogs coupled to an isotopic or non-isotopic signal-generating molecule that competes with free hormone for a limited number of antibody binding sites in a classic competitive immunoassay format. Although conceptually attractive, and despite early claims of success using this approach to measure free hormone independent of binding protein concentrations, it has been difficult to achieve satisfactory results in practice, (115-117,167, 168). In fact, recent studies have shown these analogs clearly have protein-binding capability and are at best free hormone “estimate” tests that offer minimal advantages over total hormone assays (11,169). Initially these methods were engineered to give normal FT4 values in high TBG states (i.e. pregnancy) but later were found to have poor diagnostic accuracy in the presence of abnormal albumin concentrations secondary to Familial Dysalbuminemic Hyperthyroxinemias (FDH), non-thyroidal illnesses (NTI), high free fatty acid concentrations or thyroid hormone autoantibodies (53,67,83,131,137,148,158,163,165,166,168,170-180).

(iii) Labeled Antibody FT4 and FT3 Methods

Labeled antibody methods represent competitive immunoassays that measure free hormone as a function the fractional occupancy of hormone-antibody binding sites using specific immunoabsorbants to quantify the unoccupied antibody binding sites in the reaction mixture (6,27,89,91,156). The physiochemical theory of analog-based labeled antibody methods would suggest that they would be as susceptible to the same errors as the labeled hormone-analog methods described above. However, the physicochemical differences arising from the binding of labeled antibodies to the solid support confer kinetic differences that result in decreased analog affinity for endogenous binding proteins and thus produce more reliable free hormone measurements (156,181). For this reason, the labeled antibody approach has become favored for a number of current automated immunoassay platforms (25,182,183).

C. Clinical Utility of FT4 and FT3 Measurements

Unfortunately, the diagnostic accuracy of a free hormone determination cannot be predicted from its methodologic classification (27,83,90). However, despite these shortcomings, these tests have come into common use because of their diagnostic usefulness.

(i)   Ambulatory Patients

Free hormone tests (FT4 or FT3) are most commonly used in preference to total hormone measurements (TT4 or TT3) to improve the diagnostic accuracy for detecting hypo- and hyperthyroidism in patient populations that may include individuals with the thyroid hormone binding abnormalities as shown in Table 1. However, it is current practice to employ TSH as the first-line test in most clinical settings [Section 4e] while relegating FT4 or FT3 measurements to second- or third-line tests (FT4 versus FT3, respectively) to investigate situations in which TSH abnormalities are found (13,37). The exception to this general rule occurs in those select conditions where TSH may be diagnostically unreliable in which case FT4 becomes the first-line test of choice. Such conditions include periods of unstable thyroid status (the early phase of treating hypo- or hyperthyroidism), when hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction is suspected to be present, or when patients are taking drugs such as glucocorticoids that are known to affect TSH secretion (13,70,184-188).

Discordances between TSH and FT4 measured on the same specimen can on occasion cause a diagnostic dilemma. However, it should be recognized that the intrinsic log/linear TSH/FT4 relationship dictates that modest reductions in TSH (0.05 – 0.3 mIU/L), or modest elevations (3 – 10 mIU/L), would not be expected to be associated with changes in FT4 values outside the normal reference range (7,13,189,190). When a severe TSH/FT4 discordance is observed, the first step should be to re-measure both TSH and FT4 using a different manufacturers platform to rule out an assay interference problem with either the FT4 and/or TSH measurements. Such FT4 problems commonly result from alterations in a thyroid hormone binding protein (often albumin) or a drug interference [Sections 3E and 7] (27,66,67). On the other hand, the most common cause of a falsely high TSH results is assay interference from a human anti-mouse (HAMA) or an endogenous TSH antibody [Section 7c(i)] (191-193).

(ii) Hospitalized Patients

Current FT4 testing methods have not yet received adequate validation in the hospital setting in which a wide variety of non-thyroidal illnesses and drug therapies are frequently encountered that are known to impair the diagnostic accuracy of both thyroid hormone and TSH testing (13,27,85,103,148,172). In particular there are three major categories of hospitalized patients that deserve special attention. They are: a) patients without known thyroid gland dysfunction who exhibit either an elevated or diminished TT4 concurrently with NTI; b) patients with primary hypothyroidism and concurrent severe NTI and, c) patients with hyperthyroidism and concurrent NTI (157,172,194). Because the diagnostic reliability of FT4 testing is questionable in sick hospitalized patients, it has been recommended that a combination of both a T4 (preferably TT4) and a TSH test be employed for assessing the thyroid status in this setting (13,148,195). In most clinical situations involving discordant FT4 and TSH results, the TSH test is usually yields the most diagnostically reliable results, provided that the patient is not receiving medications such as glucocorticoids and dopamine that directly inhibit TSH secretion, or conditions that involve pituitary failure (70,187). Repetitive TSH testing may be particularly helpful in sorting out the cause of abnormal FT4 results as repeat TSH values will trend back towards normal over time if the TSH abnormality results from the acute effects of NTI alone, while the abnormality will persist if it is due to underlying thyroid dysfunction (151).

D.  FT4 and FT3 reference ranges

The FT4 reference range for male and female infants 1 – 12 month-old is 0.9 – 1.9 ng/dL (11.6 – 24.5 pmol/L). The reference range for children 1 to 18 years old it is 0.9 – 1.6 ng/dL (11.6 – 20.6 pmol/L) which is similar to that observed for adults (6,62,93,108,112,114,182,196). Likewise, the FT3 reference range for males and females 1 month to 18 years was 1.0 – 4.0 pg/mL (2.1 – 6.1 pmol/L) (6,62,59,93,108,112,114). These determinations were made at 25°C, when testing is performed at 37°C both FT4 and FT3 values were reported as 1.5 fold higher (114). It is now recommended that FT4 and FT3 testing be performed at 37°C (89,104,114,197). Recent studies have reported an inverse relationship between pediatric age and FT4 immunoassay values for both males and females (198).

E. Interferences with FT4 and FT3 Tests

Common conditions that decrease the diagnostic accuracy of current free hormone estimate tests in ambulatory patients include:

(a)     TBG abnormalities

States of Thyroxine Binding Globulin (TBG) excess or deficiency are commonly encountered in clinical practice in association with a variety of pathophysiologic conditions or drug therapies as listed in Table 1.

(i)   Congenital TBG excess or deficiency

Neither free hormone immunoassays, or some free T4 index tests, are able to reliably estimate free hormone concentrations when TBG concentrations are grossly altered such as is the case with congenital TBG excess or deficiency states (27,81).

(ii) Pregnancy

As with non-pregnant patients TSH is the most reliable marker for thyroid status during pregnancy. However, pregnant patients with undetectable TSH during early treatment for hyperthyroidism need a reliable estimate of FT4 status and unfortunately non-pregnant FT4 reference ranges do not apply to pregnancy (39,40,42,149). Specifically, low FT4 immunoassay values are observed in a significant proportion of women by the third trimester of pregnancy to a method-dependent degree.Albumin levels tend to fall during pregnancy (199) and the frequency of low FT4 values during pregnancy appears to be method-related, likely reflecting the albumin-dependence of the method (11) (Figure 2).

figure 2

The albumin-dependence of current FT4 immunoassay methods is only one of a myriad of factors that compromise establishing reference ranges for each trimester of pregnancy that could be applied to all populations, even were the same method used. Factors that influence FT4 reference ranges established using different studies include:

  1. The binding protein (TBG and albumin) dependence of the method (11,94,183,200-202).
  2. The week(s) of gestation studied which is critically important for the first trimester when the high levels of hCG stimulate the thyroid by virtue of hCG homology with TSH. Also, whether multiple pregnancies were excluded (203-210).
  3. The size of the study and whether TPOAb-positive women were excluded (211-215).
  4. The demographics of patient cohort (ethnicity, patient age, BMI and iodine status) (205, 210,214,216-219).
  5. The artifactual low FT4 immunoassay values, coupled with an inability to establish trimester-specific reference ranges that can be applied to all patient populations have led to the use of free T4 index (FT4I) methods for evaluating FT4 status of pregnant patients because non-pregnant reference ranges have been shown to apply throughout pregnancy (42,118,203,220,221). Even TT4 measurements can be used if the reference limits are adjusted by a factor of 1.5 to compensate for the increased TBG (39,40,42,76,222).

(b) Familial Dysalbuminemic and Transthyretin-Associated Hyperthyroxinemias

Autosomal dominant mutations in the Albumin or Transthyretin (prealbumin) gene can result in altered protein structures with enhanced affinity for thyroxine and/or triiodothyronine. These abnormal proteins can interfere with FT4 and/or FT3 measurements and result in inappropriately high values being reported (67,223). Familial Dysalbuminemic Hyperthyroxinemia (FDH) is a rare condition with a prevalence of ~1.8 % in the Hispanic population. There are 3 genetic variants with the R218H being the most common. This typically results in a two-fold elevation in TT4 but only minimal changes in TT3. The R218P mutation is associated with extreme TT4 elevations as well as TT3, whereas the L66P mutation affects mainly T3 (224). Affected individuals are euthyroid and have normal TSH and FT4 when measured by direct techniques such as equilibrium dialysis (67,175). Unfortunately, most FT4 estimate tests (immunoassays and indexes) report falsely high values that may prompt inappropriate treatment for presumed hyperthyroid if the condition is not recognized.

(c) T4 and T3 autoantibodies

T4 and T3 autoantibodies can falsely elevate total hormone, free hormone or THBR measurements depending on the method employed (68,69,132,133,225). The prevalence of thyroid hormone autoantibodies ranges from 2 percent in the general population to as much as 30 percent in patients with autoimmune thyroid disease (226). However, despite this high prevalence of detectable thyroid autoantibodies, significant interference caused by these antibodies is considerably less common and depends on the qualitative characteristics of the autoantibody present (i.e. its affinity for the test reagents). Further, different methods exhibit interference to a greater or lesser degree (68,69). Because autoantibody interference is difficult for the laboratory to detect proactively, it is most commonly first suspected by the physician who sees a gross discordance between the clinical presentation of the patient and the laboratory test results (132,225). Importantly, these autoantibodies will cross the placenta and may cause a false-negative screening test for congenital hypothyroidism in the newborn (227).

4. Serum TSH (Thyroid Stimulating Hormone/Thyrotropin) Assays

Over the last four decades serum TSH assay methodology has undergone dramatic improvements that have revolutionized strategies for thyroid testing and firmly established TSH as the first-line thyroid function test to assess thyroid hormone status for most clinical conditions (13,37,228). In fact, serum TSH has become the single most reliable test for diagnosing abnormalities in thyroid status, provided that patients are ambulatory and not receiving drug therapies that alter TSH secretion (187,228). The diagnostic superiority of TSH measurement arises principally from the physiologic inverse log/linear relationship between circulating TSH and free T4 concentrations (7,13,189,190).

(a) TSH Assay Methodology

TSH assay “quality” has historically been defined by its clinical sensitivity – the ability to discriminate between hyperthyroid and euthyroid values (13,229-231). The first generation of TSH assays used between 1965 and 1985 were based on RIA methodology that had limited functional sensitivity (~ 1.0 mIU/L) (232-234). Because these RIA-era TSH methods were too insensitive to detect TSH in all euthyroid subjects, their clinical utility was limited to the diagnosis of primary hypothyroidism (235-237). Between 1970 and 1980, considerable efforts were made to develop TSH methods that could discriminate euthyroid from hyperthyroid TSH values (238-242). The use of modified RIA procedures employing a pre-treatment lectin affinity extraction or a long pre-incubation period before tracer addition, could achieve this discrimination, but these were principally limited to research applications (241-243). In 1970, the hypothalamic tripeptide, Thyrotropin Releasing Hormone (TRH) (Thyroliberin) was synthesized and shown to be capable of stimulating serum TSH into the measurable range in all euthyroid subjects, but not patients with hyperthyroidism or hypopituitarism (244,245). These observations led to the practice of measuring serum TSH 15-30 minutes following a 200-500µg IV TRH dose as a way to overcome the insensitivity of the TSH RIA methodology (246-249). However, the practice of TRH testing fell into decline after the more sensitive immunometric assay (IMA) methodology (also called “sandwich” or “noncompetitive” methodology) became available in the mid-1980s (7,248-250). These IMA techniques are based on the excess antibody approach of Miles and Hales, originally reported in the 1960s but did not become widely adopted until advances in monoclonal antibody technology allowed the large-scale production of specific antibodies in the 1980s (251-253). Mechanistically, these IMA methods employed an excess of TSH monoclonal antibody, bound to a solid support (bead, tube, magnetic microparticle or adsorption gel) that captured TSH from the serum specimen during a 20 to 120 minute incubation period (254-256). A different poly- or monoclonal TSH antibodies, targeted to a different TSH epitope(s) and labeled with an isotopic (I-125) or non-isotopic signal was then added followed by a further incubation and removal of unbound constituents by washing. The signal bound to the solid support was quantified as being directly proportional to the serum TSH concentration in the test sample. Later modifications to this basic concept included the use of chimeric monoclonal antibodies to reduce interference by heterophilic antibodies [Section 7c(i)] and the use of Avidin-Biotin and magnetic particle separation techniques (257-259). In the last two decades, TSH assay sensitivity has been further enhanced by the adoption of non-isotopic (chemiluminescent and fluorescent) signals that are inherently more sensitive than I-125 and offer the additional advantage of being easier to automate (15,260,261). By 1990, IMA non-isotopic methods had replaced most TSH RIA methods and as a result of inherently greater assay sensitivity and specificity resulted in narrowing the TSH reference range by reducing glycoprotein hormone cross-reactivity and improving precision (5,262). Currently, most TSH testing is performed on automated immunoassay platforms employing advanced IMA technology [Section 8] (15,33,263-266).

(b) TSH Nomenclature

The first generation RIA methods had a detection limit approximating 1.0 mIU/L. A ten-fold improvement in sensitivity (~ 0.1 mIU/L) was seen with the early IMA methods that used an isotopic (I-125) signal (250). With this level of sensitivity, the lower euthyroid reference limit was determined as being 0.3-0.4 mIU/L and overt hyperthyroidism could be diagnosed with a high degree of confidence without the need for TRH stimulation (247,250,267-272). However, a sensitivity of 0.10 mIU/L was insufficient for detecting different degrees of hyperthyroidism (i.e subclinical versus overt) and efforts to further sensitize IMA methodology continued (15,247,263,274,273). It became clear that IMA sensitivity was largely determined by the “signal” used. The first IMA methods that used a radioisotopic signal (I-125) were designated “immunoradiometric assays”, or IRMAs (250). Subsequent IMA methods adopted a variety of non-isotopic signals that gave rise to a lexicon of terminology to distinguish between assays using different signals. For example, immunoenzymometric assays (IEMA) used enzyme signals; immunofluorometric assays (IFMA) used fluorophors as signals, immunochemiluminometric assays (ICMA) used chemiluminescent molecules as signals and immunobioluminometric assays (IBMA) used bioluminescent signal molecules (275) (15). This explosion of methodology led to a range of IMAs with competing claims for sensitivity. Initially, the IMA methods were designated as “sensitive”, “highly sensitive”, “ultrasensitive” or “supersensitive” assays – terms used to distinguish the new IMA methodology from the older insensitive RIA methods then still in use (5,276-280). This descriptive nomenclature was confusing and led to a debate concerning the meaning of “sensitivity” (15,281). After it became evident that it was the between-run precision of the method that was the best determinant of assay sensitivity, a new parameter “functional sensitivity” became adopted (13,15). Functional sensitivity has been defined as the TSH value associated with a 20 percent coefficient of variation (CV) established from assays run over a 6 to 8 week period (a typical clinical interval used to assess TSH changes in an out-patient setting) (13). Both manufacturers and clinical laboratories have now adopted this functional sensitivity definition as the lowest reporting limit for TSH assays. Importantly, this concept of functional sensitivity has also been extended to the measurement of other analytes (5,13,13,15,282). The new nomenclature also defines each generation as having a ten-fold difference in functional sensitivity. For example, RIA methods with functional sensitivities between 1 and 2 mIU/L are designated as “first generation”. IMA methods with functional sensitivities between 0.1 and 0.2 mIU/L are designated as “second generation”. Third generation TSH methods with functional sensitivities between 0.01 and 0.02 mIU/L are typically automated and non-isotopic and have become recognized as necessary to meet the current standard of care (15,31,282,283,284).

(c) TSH Population Reference Ranges

Serum TSH is now considered to be the most important thyroid test for assessing the early development of either hypo- or hyperthyroidism, because the log/linear TSH/FT4 relationship dictates that an altered TSH will be the first abnormality to appear – as soon as the pituitary registers that FT4 has changed from its genetically-determined setpoint for that particular individual (7,189,190,228,285). It follows that the setting of the TSH reference range is critical for detecting mild (subclinical) hypo- or hyperthyroidism.

Current guidelines recommend that “TSH reference intervals should be established from the 95 percent confidence limits of the log-transformed values of at least 120 rigorously screened normal euthyroid volunteers who have: (a) No detectable thyroid autoantibodies, TPOAb or TgAb (measured by sensitive immunoassay); (b) No personal or family history of thyroid dysfunction; (c) No visible or palpable goiter and, (c) Who are taking no medications except estrogen” (13).

The sensitivity limitations of the first generation RIA methods precluded detecting the lower euthyroid reference limit (2.5 percentile) whereas upper reference limits (97.5 percentile) were reportedly to be as high as 10 mIU/L. This elevated upper limit primarily resulted from gonadotropin cross-reactivity and the failure to exclude individuals with subclinical autoimmune thyroid disease who have higher TSH values (237,286-288). Using current third generation IMA methodology, the lower TSH reference limit has now been shown to approximate 0.3 to 0.4 mIU/L (289-291). This estimate appears consistent irrespective of the population studied or the method used (289,290,292-297). In contrast, the setting of the TSH upper reference limit (97.5 percentile) has become controversial (291,298-301) with estimates ranging from 2.1 mIU/L (295,297) to 7.5 mIU/L (289,299,302). Multiple factors influence the calculation of the TSH upper reference limit for a population. These include population demographics like sex (289), ethnicity (289,303-305), iodine intake (306), BMI (307-312), smoking status (303,313,314) and age (302,304,315,316) as well as the failure to exclude the presence of subclinical autoimmune thyroid disease using the presence of TPO antibodies (287,289,317,318).

Recent studies have suggested that TSH increases with age and that a mild TSH elevation in elderly individuals may even convey a survival benefit, although other reports dispute this (299,302,319-324). These reports have led to the suggestion that age-specific TSH reference limits should be considered (315,325). However, it appears that these mild TSH elevations may be transient (326), or in part relate to polymorphisms of the TSH receptor and cannot be interpreted to imply that subclinical hypothyroidism per se is necessarily advantageous for elderly individuals (321,327,328). Whereas there appears to be a positive correlation between age and TSH concentrations in iodine sufficient populations (289,299,329) the opposite is the case for iodine deficient populations in which there appears to be no TSH increase with age, or even a decline (286,295,296,330,331). In areas of iodine sufficiency the correlation between increasing TSH and age could represent a failure to exclude subjects with autoimmunity who may, or may not, be detected by a positive TPOAb test (317,332,333). Complicating these questions is the fact that current TSH IMAs differ in specificity for recognizing circulating TSH isoforms and that this can give rise to a full 1.0 mIU/L difference in TSH values reported by different assays – a difference that in some cases is greater than the influence of many of the other variables listed above (31,296,334,335). Because hypothalamic TRH modulates TSH molecular glycosylation and biologic activity, a rise in TSH with age could represent an increase in the secretion of biologically inactive TSH, yet immunologically detected isoforms (336,337). The blunting of the TSH response to TRH and decreased amplitude of the TSH nocturnal peak would be consistent with this premise (338,339). In contrast, in areas of iodine deficiency the inverse relationship between TSH and age could represent a failure to exclude individuals with autonomously functioning nodules (332).

The TSH upper reference limits for non-pregnant subjects remains a contentious issue, such that it is difficult for manufacturers to cite a TSH reference range appropriate for universal adoption across different populations in different geographic areas (Figure 3). This has led to guidelines proposing the adoption of an empiric TSH upper limit of 2.5 -3.0 mIU/L, which is in accord with the TSH interval associated with the lowest prevalence of thyroid antibodies (13,37,228,317). Furthermore, a TSH upper limit between 2.0 and 3.0 mIU/L would also be appropriate for reproductive age women and pregnancy, in whom current guidelines now recommend using 2.5 mIU/L for preconception planning and the first trimester, and 3.0 mIU/L as the upper limit for the second and third trimesters (13,39,40,203,228,288,340).

figure 3

The adult TSH population reference range does not apply to neonates or children. Serum TSH values are generally higher in neonates and then gradually decline until the adult range is reached after puberty (198,296,341-346). This necessitates using age-specific TSH reference ranges for diagnosing thyroid dysfunction in these pediatric age categories.

(d) TSH Biologic Variability

The within-person variability of basal TSH concentrations is relatively narrow compared with between-person variability both for non-pregnant and pregnant subjects (190,347,348). In fact, the serum TSH concentrations of euthyroid volunteers was found to vary only 0.5 mIU/L when tested every month over a span of one year (347). Twin studies further suggest that there are genetic factors that determine hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid setpoints (285,349,350). These studies report that the inheritable contribution to the serum TSH level approximates 65 percent (349,351). This genetic influence appears, in part, to involve single nucleotide polymorphisms in thyroid hormone pathway genes such as the phosphodiesterase gene (PDE8B) (352-354) and the TSH receptor, where polymorphisms may be associated with gain or loss of function (352,355,356), and the type II deiodinase enzyme (357). Undoubtedly, such polymorphisms likely account for some of the euthyroid outliers that skew TSH reference range calculations (329,358).

figure 4

Serum TSH, as with other thyroid tests, has narrow within-person variability and thus a low (< 0.6) index of individuality (IoI) (190,347,348,359-361). This limits the usefulness of using the population-based reference range to detect thyroid dysfunction in an individual patient (190,348,361,362). It further suggests that when evaluating patients with marginally (yet confirmed) either low (0.1–0.4 mIU/L) or high (3–10 mIU/L) TSH abnormalities, it may be more important to consider the degree of TSH abnormality relative to patient-specific risk factors for cardiovascular disease rather than the degree of the abnormality relative to the TSH reference range (Figure 4)  (363,364).

(e) Clinical Utility of TSH Measurement

(i)   Ambulatory Patients

Serum TSH normally exhibits a diurnal variation with a peak between midnight and 0400 and (365-368). However, because TSH testing is most commonly performed in the outpatient setting during normal daytime working hours, it is not usually influenced by the time of day of the blood draw (367). Furthermore, there is no need to withhold the levothyroxine (L-T4) dose on the day of the blood draw, because TSH secretion is slow to respond to changes in thyroxine status (13). The TSH concentration is used as the target for adjusting L-T4 medication within a very narrow therapeutic index (228,369,370). It is well known that L-T4 absorption is highly variable and influenced by the simultaneous ingestion of food. To address this issue a recent study reported that TSH remained within the narrowest target range when the daily L-T4 dose was ingested in a fasting state, preferably before breakfast after an overnight fast (371).

Current guidelines recommend that serum TSH be used as the first-line test for detecting both overt and subclinical hypo- or hyperthyroidism in ambulatory patients with stable thyroid status and intact hypothalamic/pituitary function (13,37,195,228,372). The current standards of care necessitate that laboratories use third generation TSH assays for this purpose (functional sensitivity 0.01-0.02 mIU/L) (31,283,373). This level of sensitivity is necessary for detecting differing degrees of TSH suppression. For example, TSH measurement in the 0.01 – 0.10 mIU/L range represents a significant risk factor for the production of atrial fibrillation in older patient populations and often is an iatrogenic consequence of L-T4 suppression or an unintended result of replacement therapy (374-376). In addition, targeting the degree of TSH suppression plays a critical role in the management of thyroid cancer (34,377,378).

One disadvantage of employing TSH as a diagnostic screening test for thyroid function is that it can often fail to detect the presence of pituitary and/or hypothalamic disease [central hypothyroidism or TSH secreting pituitary tumors (TSHomas)] (185,186,188,379). In these conditions serum TSH can be paradoxically within the normal reference limits because current assays cannot distinguish between normal and biologically altered TSH isoforms that may be present in these states. For example, TSH isoforms with impaired biologic activity are typically secreted in central hypothyroidism whereas TSH isoforms with enhanced biologic activity are often secreted by TSHomas (185,379). These abnormal TSH isoforms can result in paradoxically normal or high TSH being reported in the face of clinical hypo- or hyperthyroidism, respectively (185,186,379,380).

(ii)   Hospitalized Patients

Non-thyroidal illnesses can frequently alter thyroid hormone peripheral metabolism and hypothalamic/pituitary function and result in a variety of thyroid test abnormalities including both decreased and increased serum TSH levels (13,151,381-383). However, it is important to distinguish the generally mild, transient TSH alterations typical of non-thyroidal illnesses from the more profound and persistent TSH changes associated with hyper- or hypothyroidism (13,151,172).

5. Thyroid Specific Autoantibodies (TPOAb, TgAb and TRAb)

Tests for antibodies against thyroid-specific antigens, thyroid peroxidase (TPO), thyroglobulin (Tg) and TSH receptors are used in the diagnosis of autoimmune thyroid disorders (19,384). Over the last four decades, thyroid antibody test methodologies have evolved from semi-quantitative agglutination and complement fixation techniques and whole animal bioassays, to specific ligand assays using recombinant antigens or cell culture systems transfected with the human TSH receptor (19,385-387). Unfortunately, the diagnostic and prognostic value of these tests is hampered by differences in sensitivity and specificity (388). Although thyroid autoantibody measurements have clinical utility for a number of clinical conditions, these tests should be selectively employed primarily as an adjunct to other diagnostic testing procedures.

(a)     TSH Receptor Autoantibodies (TRAb)

The TSH receptor (TSHR) serves as a major autoantigen (389,390). Thyroid gland stimulation occurs when TSH binds to TSHR on thyrocyte plasma membranes and activates the cAMP and phospholipase C signaling pathways (390). The TSH receptor belongs to the G protein-coupled class of transmembrane receptors. It undergoes complex posttranslational processing in which the ectodomain of the receptor is cleaved to release a subunit into the circulation (389). A TSH-like thyroid stimulator found uniquely in the serum of Graves’ disease patients was first described using a guinea pig bioassay system in 1956 (391). Later, using a mouse thyroid bioassay system this serum factor was noted to have a prolonged stimulatory effect as compared to TSH and hence was termed to be a “long-acting thyroid stimulator” or LATS (392,393). Much later, the LATS factor was recognized not to be a TSH-like protein but an antibody that was capable of stimulating the TSH receptor causing Graves’ hyperthyroidism (394). In addition, TSH receptor antibodies have become implicated in the pathogenesis of Graves’ opthalmopathy (394-396). TRAbs are heterogeneous (polyclonal) and fall into two general classes both of which can be associated with autoimmune thyroid disorders – (a) thyroid stimulating autoantibodies (TSAb) that mimic that the actions of TSH and cause Graves’ hyperthyroidism and (b), blocking antibodies (TBAb) that block TSH binding to its receptor and can cause hypothyroidism (19,390,394,397). Although TSH, TSAb and TBAb appear to bind to different sites on the TSH receptor ectoderm, TSAb and TBAb have similar affinities and often overlapping epitope specificities (398). In some cases of Graves’ hyperthyroidism, TBAb has been detected in association with TSAb (399,400, and the dominance of one over the other can change over time in response to treatment 401). Because both TSAb and TBAb can be present in the same patient, the relative concentrations and receptor binding characteristics of these two classes of TRAb may influence the severity of Graves’ hyperthyroidism and the response to antithyroid drug therapy or pregnancy (389,399,401-406). For completeness, it should also be mentioned that a third class of “neutral” TRAb has also been described, of which the functional significance has yet to be determined (404,407).

Two different methodologic approaches have been used to quantify TSH receptor antibodies (20,21,397): (i) TSH receptor tests (TRAb assays) also called TBII or TSH Binding Inhibition Immunoglobulin assays, and (ii) Bioassays that use whole cells transfected with human or chimeric TSH receptors that produce a biologic response (cAMP or bioreporter gene) when TSHR stimulating or blocking antibodies are present in a serum specimen.

(i) Bioassay methods (TSAb/TBAb)
Early assays were either homogeneous and used surgical human thyroid specimens, or heterogeneous, using mouse or guinea pig thyroid cells and later rat FRTL-5 cell lines to detect TSH receptor stimulating antibodies. These methods typically required pre-extraction of immunoglobulins from the serum specimen (391,408-412). Later, TRAb bioassays used cells with endogenously expressed or stably transfected human TSH receptors had the ability to use unextracted serum specimens (413-415). Current TSH receptor antibody bioassays are functional assays that use intact (typically CHO) cells transfected with human or chimeric TSH receptors, which when exposed to serum containing TSH receptor antibodies use cAMP or a reporter gene (luciferase) as a biological marker for stimulating or blocking activity in a patient’s serum (21,22,24,387,411-413,416). Bioassays are more technically demanding than the more commonly used TBII/TRAb assays because they use viable cells but can be modified to detect blocking antibodies (TBAb) which may coexist with stimulating antibodies (TSAb) in the same sera and make interpretation difficult (21,417). The most recent development is for 2nd generation assays to use a chimeric human/rat LH TSHR to effectively eliminate the influence of blocking antibodies. This new approach has shown excellent sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing Graves’ hyperthyroidism and clinical utility for monitoring the effects of anti-thyroid drug therapy (24,418).

(ii) Receptor methods (TRAb/TBII)
TSH receptor antibody tests (TRAb) detect serum TSH receptor immunoglobulins that interact with the TSH receptor without the functional discrimination of stimulating from blocking antibodies. They do however offer the advantage of being rapid and being able to be automated. The methods are based on competitive binding principles, whereby immunoglobulins in serum compete with radiolabeled bovine or porcine TSH or a TSH receptor binding monoclonal antibody (coded M22) for binding to an immobilized TSHR preparation (recombinant human or porcine TSHR) – these methods thus detect TSH binding inhibition immunoglobulins (TBII) (21,22,387,416,419,420). TRAb tests have progressively improved over recent years. The 1st generation of TBII methods used I125-labeled TSH and animal tissues (guinea pig fat cells or porcine thyroid membranes) as sources of the TSH receptor preparation (21). Subsequently, a 2nd generation of non-isotopic TBII assays was developed based on isotopic or chemiluminescent-labeled TSH binding to human TSH receptors expressed in CHO cells or directly to a recombinant TSH receptor protein preparation (21,421,422). These 2nd generation assays were reported to have superior sensitivity for diagnosing Graves’ disease (423). Current non-isotopic 3rd generation assays use the TSHR binding monoclonal antibody (M22), have improved sensitivity and are commercially available using automated systems (19,21,22,24,387,419-421,424,425). 3rd generation assays have also shown a good correlation and comparable overall diagnostic sensitivity with bioassay methods (387,399,416,426-428). However, between-method variability remains high and interassay precision often suboptimal (CVs > 10 %) despite the use of the same international reference preparation for calibration (388,429). This fact makes it difficult to compare values using different methods and indicates that further efforts focused on additional assay improvements are needed (19,388,430).

(iii) Clinical Use of TRAb Tests
Currently, most TRAb testing is performed using automated TBII methodology [Section 5a(ii)]. Although TBII tests do not distinguish between stimulating and blocking antibodies, this methodologic distinction is often unnecessary, because it is evident from the clinical presentation of hyper- or hypothyroid features. However, both TSHR stimulating and blocking antibodies can be detected simultaneously in the same patient and cause diagnostic confusion (418,431). TRAb testing can be used in the differential diagnosis of the etiology of hyperthyroidism, as a useful and independent risk factor for Graves’ opthalmopathy and to monitor responses to therapy for this condition (432,433). TRAb measured prior to radioiodine therapy for Graves’ hyperthyroidism can also help predict the risk for exacerbating opthalmopathy (395,434-438). Although early studies reported that TRAb measurement is not useful for predicting the response to antithyroid drug treatment (400,422,426,439-442), current bioassays report clinical utility in distinguishing between remission and relapse (24). However, it is the evaluation of pregnant patients with a history of autoimmune thyroid disease, or active or previously treated Graves’ hyperthyroidism in whom there is a risk of transplacental passage of TRAb (TSAb or TBAb) to the infant, that is one of the most important applications of TRAb testing (20,21,40,150,387,443-445). For this application, because they detect both stimulating and blocking antibodies, TBII tests may be preferable to bioassay methods, because and the expression of thyroid dysfunction may be different in the mother and infant (446). It is currently recommended that TRAb be measured in the third trimester in all pregnant patients with active Graves’ hyperthyroidism or who have received prior ablative (radioiodine or surgery) therapy for Graves’ disease (13,19,40,150). This is because TRAb can remain high even after patients have been rendered hypothyroid and are maintained on L-T4 replacement therapy (399). A very rare exception to this analysis are patients presenting with very high circulating concentrations of hCG due to choriocarcinoma or hydatiform mole who may have misleading positive results using some TSAb assays (441).

(b) Thyroid Peroxidase Autoantibodies (TPOAb)

TPO is a large, dimeric, membrane-associated, globular glycoprotein that is expressed on the apical surface of thyrocytes. TPO autoantibodies (TPOAb) found in sera typically have high affinities for an immunodominant region of the intact TPO molecule. When present, these autoantibodies vary in titre and IgG subclass and display complement-fixing properties (447). Studies have shown that epitope fingerprints are genetically conserved suggesting a possible functional importance (448). However, it is still unclear whether the epitope profile correlates with the presence of, or potential for, the development of thyroid dysfunction with which TPOAb presence is most commonly associated clinically (447,449-452).

TPOAb antibodies were initially detected as antibodies against thyroid microsomes (antimicrosomal antibody, AMA) using semi-quantitative complement fixation and tanned erythrocyte hemaagglutination techniques (453-455). Recent studies have identified the principal antigen in the AMA tests as the thyroid peroxidase (TPO) enzyme, a 100 kD glycosylated protein present in thyroid microsomes (456,457). Manual agglutination tests have now been replaced by automated, more specific TPOAb immunoassay or immunometric assay methods that use purified or recombinant TPO (13,19,386,458-465). Despite calibration against the same International Reference Preparation (MRC 66/387), there is considerable inter-method variability of current TPOAb assays (correlation coefficients 0.65 and 0.87) that precludes the numeric comparison of serum TPOAb values reported by different tests (19,385,386,461,464,465). It appears that both the methodologic principles of the test and the purity of the TPO reagent used may influence the sensitivity, specificity and reference range of the method (19,386). The variability in sensitivity limits (range <0.3 to >20 kIU/L) and the reference ranges of different methods has led to different interpretations regarding the normalcy of having a detectable TPOAb (19,465). Specifically, assays characterized by a low detection limit (<10 kIU/L) typically report un-measureable TPOAb values for “normal” euthyroid subjects, suggesting that the detection of this autoantibody is a pathologic finding (466). In contrast, assays reporting higher detection limits (>10 kIU/L) typically cite a TPOAb “normal range”, suggesting that low levels of this autoantibody are compatible with normal physiology (467). Whether detectable “normal” values reflect physiology or lack of assay specificity remains to be determined.

(i) Clinical Significance of Detecting TPOAb
Estimates of TPOAb prevalence depend on the sensitivity and specificity of the method employed (465,468). In addition, ethnic and/or geographic factors (such as iodine intake) influence the TPOAb prevalence in population studies (469). For example, TPOAb prevalence is significantly higher (~11 percent) in dietary iodine-sufficient countries like the United States and Japan as compared with iodine deficient areas in Europe (~ 6 percent) (289,290,470). The prevalence of TPOAb is higher in women of all age groups and ethnicities, presumably reflecting the higher propensity for autoimmunity as compared with men (289,470). Approximately 70-80 % of patients with Graves’ disease and virtually all patients with Hashimoto’s or post-partum thyroiditis have TPOAb detected (386,461,464,466,468). TPOAb has, in fact, been implicated as a cytotoxic agent in the destructive thyroiditic process (452,471-474). However, TPOAb prevalence is also significantly higher in various non-thyroidal autoimmune disorders in which no apparent thyroid dysfunction is evident (475-477). Aging is associated with an increasing prevalence of TPOAb that parallels the increasing prevalence of both subclinical (mild) and clinical hypothyroidism (289). In fact, the NHANES III survey reported that TPOAb prevalence increases with age and approaches 15-20 percent in elderly females in the iodine-sufficient United States (289). This same study found that the odds ratio for hypothyroidism was strongly associated with the presence of TPOAb but not TgAb, suggesting that only TPOAb has an autoimmune etiology (289). Although the presence of TgAb alone did not appear to be associated with hypothyroidism or TSH elevations, the combination of TPOAb and TgAb versus TPOAb alone may be more pathologically significant, although further studies would be needed to confirm this (287,289,317,452). It is now apparent that the presence of TPOAb in the serum of apparently euthyroid individuals (TSH within reference range) appears to be a risk factor for future development of overt hypothyroidism that subsequently becomes evident at the rate of approximately 2 percent per year in such populations (447,448,478,479).

In this context, it is reasonable to assume that TPOAb measurement may serve as a useful prognostic indicator for future thyroid dysfunction (479,480). However, it is noteworthy that the detection of TPOAb does not always precede the development of thyroid dysfunction. A recent study suggests that a hypoechoic ultrasound pattern can be seen before a biochemical TPOAb abnormality is detected (333,469). Further, some individuals with unequivocal TSH elevations, presumably resulting from autoimmune destructive disease of the thyroid, do not have TPOAb detected (317). Presumably, this paradoxical absence of TPOAb in some patients with elevated TSH likely reflects the suboptimal sensitivity and/or specificity of current TPOAb tests or a non-autoimmune cause of thyroid failure (i.e. atrophic thyroiditis) (289,317,465,481).

Although changes in autoantibody concentrations often occur with treatment or reflect a change in disease activity, serial TPOAb measurements are not recommended for monitoring treatment for autoimmune thyroid diseases (228,386,482). This is not surprising since treatment of these disorders addresses the consequence (thyroid dysfunction) and not the cause (autoimmunity) of the disease. However, where it may have an important clinical application is to employ the presence of serum TPOAb as a risk factor for developing thyroid dysfunction in patients receiving Amiodarone, Interferon-alpha, Interleukin-2 or Lithium therapies which all appear to act as triggers for initiating autoimmune thyroid dysfunction in susceptible (especially TPOAb-positive) individuals (13,70,483-489).

During pregnancy the presence of TPOAb has been linked to reproductive complications such as miscarriage, infertility, IVF failure, fetal death, pre-eclampisa, pre-term delivery and post-partum thyroiditis and depression (39,40,211,490-501). However, if this association represents cause or effect has yet to be been resolved.

(c) Thyroglobulin Autoantibodies (TgAb)

Thyroglobulin autoantibodies predominantly belong to the immunoglobulin G (IgG) class, are not complement fixing and are generally conformational (502). Serum TgAb were the first thyroid antibody to be detected in patients with autoimmune thyroid disorders using tanned red cell hemagglutination techniques (454). Subsequently, methodologies for detecting TgAb have evolved in parallel with those for TPOAb methodology from semi-quantitative techniques, to more sensitive ELISA and RIA methods and most recently non-isotopic competitive or non-competitive immunoassays (8,19,23,461,465-467,503-505). Unfortunately, the inter-method variability of these TgAb assays is even greater than that of comparable TPOAb tests discussed above (8,19,23,503-505). Additionally, high levels of endogenous thyroglobulin in the serum specimen have the potential to influence TgAb measurements (505-508). The between-method variability reflects variability in both purity and the epitope specificity of the Tg protein reagent, as well as the inherent heterogeneity of the antibodies present in different patients sera (509,510). As with TPOAb methods, TgAb tests report wide variability in both sensitivity limits (<0.3 to >100 kIU/L) and cut-off values used to define “TgAb positivity” despite the use of the same International Reference Preparation (MRC 65/93) (8,23,503-505,511). Although there are reports that low levels of TgAb may be present in normal euthyroid individuals, it is unclear whether this represents assay noise due to matrix effects or “natural” antibodies (467,512). Further complicating this question are studies suggesting that there may be qualitative differences in TgAb epitope specificities expressed by normal individuals versus patients with either differentiated thyroid cancers (DTC) or autoimmune thyroid disorders (467,510,513). These differences in test specificity impact the reliability of a TgAb method for screening sera for prior to serum Tg measurement [Section 6a(v)].

(i) Clinical Utility of TgAb Tests
Autoantibodies against Tg are encountered in autoimmune thyroid conditions, usually in association with TPOAb (289,479,504,514). However, the NHANES III survey found that only three percent of subjects with no risk factors for thyroid disease had serum TgAb present without detectable TPOAb (289,317). Further, in these subjects there was no association observed between the isolated presence of TgAb and TSH abnormalities (289,317). This suggests that it may be unnecessary to measure both TPOAb and TgAb for a routine evaluation of thyroid autoimmunity (19,317,479). In fact, when autoimmune thyroid disease is present, there is some evidence that assessing the combination of TPOAb and TgAb has greater diagnostic utility than the TPOAb measurement alone (287,317479,515).

TgAb measurement is primarily used as an adjunctive test to serum Tg measurement when monitoring patients with differentiated thyroid cancers (DTC) (34). The role of TgAb testing is tow-fold: 1) to authenticate that a Tg measurement is not compromised by TgAb interference [Section 6A(d)(ii)]. 2) as an independent surrogate tumor-marker in the ~20 percent of patients with circulating TgAb [Section 6A(d)(ii)]. Current guidelines recommend that all sera be prescreened for TgAb by a sensitive immunoassay method prior to serum Tg testing, because there appears to be no threshold TgAb concentration that precludes TgAb interference with Tg measurements (8,13,16,23,34,466,504,516). Immunoassay methods detect TgAb in approximately twenty percent of patients presenting with DTC (23,466,517-519). The prevalence of TgAb is typically higher in patients with papillary versus follicular tumors and is frequently associated with the presence of lymph node metastases (504,517,519,520). Perhaps of even greater importance is the observation that serially determined TgAb concentrations may also serve as an independent parameter for detecting changes in tumor mass in patients with an established diagnosis of DTC (Figure 5) (519-524). For example, after TgAb-positive patients are rendered athyreotic by surgery, TgAb concentrations typically progressively decline during the first few post-operative years and typically become undetectable after a median of three years of follow-up (519,520,524). In contrast, a rise in, or de novo appearance of, TgAb is often the first indication of tumor recurrence (466,520,525). However, when using serial TgAb measurements as a surrogate marker for changes in tumor burden it is essential to use the same TgAb method, because of the large between-method differences observed with this assay [Section 6A(a] (8,16,23,466,503505,511).

figure 5

Typically, serial serum changes in Tg RIA versus TgAb are concordant (466,521). However, TgAb is the more responsive parameter and a disparity between these two parameters (rising TgAb/declining Tg RIA) may still indicate recurrence, because as tumor mass increases and more Tg is secreted there is an increase in Tg-TgAb immune complexes which may be more rapidly cleared than free Tg (526). In some cases discordant serial serum Tg RIA versus TgAb responses are seen. For example, declining serum TgAb associated with rising Tg RIA can result following thyroidectomy in patients with autoimmune thyroid disease, whereby circulating TgAb declines in response to the decrease in normally iodinated Tg secreted from thyroid remnant tissue at the time that poorly iodinated (less immunogenic) Tg is being secreted by recurrent tumor.  Transient rises in TgAb may be seen in response to the acute release of Tg following thyroid surgery (527), fine needle aspiration biopsy (528,529) or more chronically during the months following radioiodine treatment that releases Tg by radioautolytic damage (517,525,530-533).

6. Thyroglobulin (Tg)

Thyroglobulin appears to play a central role in a wide variety of pathophysiologic conditions affecting the thyroid gland. For example, Tg has been implicated as a possible autoantigen involved in the production of thyroid autoimmune diseases (384,502,534). Genetic defects in Tg biosynthesis have been clearly shown to result in congenital hypothyroidism due to dyshormongenesis (13,535-538). The tissue-specific origin of Tg has also led to its use for as a test for determining the etiology of congenital hypothyroidism (539,540) and for diagnosing factitious hyperthyroidism where failure to observe elevated serum Tg values characteristic of true hyperthyroidism is absent (541-543). Serum Tg measurement is primarily used as a tumor marker for differentiated thyroid cancers (DTC) (34,38,544-551). The serum Tg concentration has also been employed to assess iodine nutrition status for population studies (552,553).

Over the last ten years laboratories have adopted the more rapid, automated Tg immunometric assays (IMA) to replace the older isotopic radioimmunoassays (RIA) (8,554,555). However, some laboratories still retain a Tg RIA because this methodology appears less prone to interferences from Tg autoantibodies (TgAb) and heterophilic antibodies (HAMA) [Section 7c] (8,12,23,519,547,548,556). It is particularly important to note that assay sensitivity and specificity critically influences the clinical utility of Tg testing. In fact, current Tg IMAs are highly variable depending on the method employed with values varying as much as three-fold and assay functional sensitivities that vary as much as ten-fold (8,12,546,554,557).

(a) Technical Limitations of Tg Assays

Unfortunately, serum Tg measurement is technically challenging. There are five methodologic problems that impair the clinical utility of the test: (a) between-method biases; (b) insensitivity; (c) suboptimal interassay precision; (d) “hook” problems (some IMA methods), and interferences caused by (e) Human Anti-Mouse Antibody (HAMA) (548,556,558-560) and, (f) Tg autoantibody (TgAb) (8,16,23,548,561).

(a) Between-Method Biases

Unfortunately, not all current Tg methods are directly standardized directly against the Certified Reference Preparation CRM-457 (555,562,563). Even methods that use CRM-457 standardization can display two- to three-fold differences in serum Tg values (8,13,548,554,563). This between-method variability is higher than the biologic variability (~14 percent) seen in euthyroid subjects and therefore reflects methodological differences (360,564). Variable assay reference ranges reflect inherent specificity differences of methods compounded by differences in the rigor used to select normal euthyroid subjects without thyroid pathology and the influence of occult TgAb interference. IMA methods typically display greater variability than RIA methods, even in the absence of TgAb (Figure 6a) (8). This variability reflects technical problems relating to standardization and/or assay matrix differences (192,555) as well as interference by TgAb that may not be detected by current assays (12,23). In addition, IMA methodology uses monoclonal antibody (MAb) reagents that typically have narrower epitope specificities for the heterogeneous Tg isoforms present in the circulation, as compared with broad epitope specificity inherent the use of polyclonal antibodies (PAb) for RIA methods (8,16,565-567). For these and other reasons, current guidelines stress the critical importance of maintaining the same Tg method for serial monitoring of patients with DTC, because a change in Tg method is very likely to compromise the clinical value of serial Tg monitoring (8,13,34,516,554,568).

figure 6

(b) Insensitivity/ Functional Sensitivity

As stressed in current guidelines it is critical that assay sensitivity be assessed in terms of functional sensitivity and not analytical sensitivity (13,282,568,569). Functional sensitivity represents the between-run precision of measuring low concentrations. Generally, the functional sensitivity of an immunoassay is defined as the lowest analyte concentration that can be measured with less than 20 percent between-run coefficient of variation (CV). Protocols used to determine assay functional sensitivity are analyte and matrix dependent:

For immunometric assays (IMA) that are used to measure Tg in TgAb-negative sera, the following stipulations apply to the protocol used for determining functional sensitivity: (13,568):
• Precision assessment should be determined in human serum free from TgAb – to eliminate interferences and matrix effects (569).
• The precision assessment should be performed over a 6 to 12 month period – to represent the typical interval used for monitoring patients with DTC.
• At least two different lots of reagents and two instrument calibrators should be used when evaluating between-run precision – because over time there is erosion of precision, especially at the extremes of the reportable range, relative to a myriad of factors relating to variability in reagents, instruments and the technical operation of the test (570).

For radioimmunoassays (RIA) and tandem mass spectrometry assays (LC-MS/MS) that are used to measure Tg in TgAb-positive sera, the above protocol used for determining functional sensitivity should be modified as follows to ensure precision is representative of measuring Tg in the specimens tested in clinical practice: (13):
• Precision assessment should be determined in human TgAb-positive sera – to ensure performance is relevant to the matrix of the clinical specimens.
• If more than one instrument (i.e. LC-MS/MS) is used, the precision assessment should include an equal amount of data from both instruments measured throughout the evaluation period.

Because current Tg assays display as much as a ten-fold difference in functional sensitivity, it is useful to consider a generational approach to Tg assay nomenclature, analogous to that established for TSH methods (5,282). In this context, most current Tg assays still only have 1st generation sensitivity (functional sensitivity = 0.5 to 1.0 µg/L when standardized directly against CRM-457) – comparable to that of early Tg radioimmunoassay (RIA) methods (4,8,554,571). Second generation IMAs with on order of magnitude greater sensitivity (functional sensitivity = 0.05–0.10 µg/L) are increasingly becoming commercially available (546,554,571-574). Because the 1st generation assay functional sensitivity limit of ~ 1.0 µg/L is very close to the lower limit of the euthyroid reference range, 1st generation assays have suboptimal sensitivity for detecting early tumor recurrence in thyroidectomized DTC patients, especially when TSH is suppressed by oral levothyroxine therapy (8,13,575). Current American Thyroid Association and European Thyroid Association guidelines for managing patients with DTC state that an “undetectable” basal and recombinant human TSH (rhTSH) stimulated Tg should be used as a parameter for the absence of disease (34,38,516). However, Tg “detectability” merely relates to assay functional sensitivity and in this context should not be used as a clinical benchmark. Clearly, patients with an undetectable serum Tg by 1st generation assay often have a detectable Tg in the 0.10 – 0.99 µg/L range when measured by a 2nd generation assay (546,547,554,573). Furthermore, a growing number of studies have now reported that the use of the more sensitive 2nd generation assays overcomes the need for expensive rhTSH-stimulated Tg testing [Section 6b(iv)] (8,547,554,557,572,573,576-581). Specifically, a basal (non TSH-stimulated) Tg measurement below 0.10 µg/L predicts a negative rhTSH test (rhTSH-stimulated Tg below 2.0 µg/L) with a high degree of confidence (557,581). However, it is important to recognize that the use of a 2nd generation Tg assay does not eliminate the need for periodic ultrasound examinations, because many lymph nodes containing DTC do not secrete enough Tg into the general circulation to be detected even when using a 2nd generation assay (34,516,573,582-584).

(c) “Hook” Problems

Tumor marker tests employing IMA methods are especially prone to the so-called “high-dose hook effects” (585-588). This phenomenon is characterized by the finding of inappropriately low values in sera when high analyte concentrations are present. The problem is caused by the high concentrations of analyte in the test specimen overwhelming the binding capacity of the solid-phase capture antibody. This phenomenon in turn reduces the ability of endogenous analyte to form a bridge between the two antibodies of the sandwich assay method thereby resulting in an inappropriately low signal (16,561,585,589,590). Manufacturers are generally aware of this problem and have attempted to overcome it by designing assays using a two-step process (586). However, when using any particular IMA method, it is primarily the laboratory’s responsibility to determine whether such a hook effect is likely to generate a falsely normal or low value (false-negative) for any particular serum specimen. Alternative approaches for both detecting and overcoming such hook effects occurring with IMA methods are:
• To routinely run each specimen at two dilutions. For example, the value obtained with a 1/5 or 1/10 dilution of the test serum would, if a hook effect were present, be higher than that obtained with an undiluted sample.
• To carry out appropriate dilution studies to rule out a possible hook effect when an unexpectedly low serum Tg value is encountered for a patient with known metastatic disease. In such cases, consultation with the physician may provide valuable information regarding this issue.
• To perform a Tg recovery test. If there is a hook effect present, the recovery of added antigen (Tg) will produce an inappropriate result.

(d) Interferences

(i) Human Anti-Mouse Antibody Interference (HAMA)
As with other immunometric assays, HAMA interferes with Tg IMA but not Tg measurements made by RIA (525,547). HAMA interference is thought to reflect inappropriate binding of the murine-derived monoclonal antibodies used as reagents in IMA methods, as opposed to the rabbit polyclonal antibodies typically used for RIA. In most cases interference is characterized by a false positive result (548,556,558,560), however, false negative interferences caused by HAMA have also been reported (559).

(ii) Tg Autoantibody (TgAb) Interferences
Tg antibodies are found in the sera of approximately 20 % of DTC patients (466,518,520,521,591-594), twice the prevalence of the general population (289). The presence of TgAb represents a major technical hurdle because these autoantibodies are capable of producing varying degrees of Tg assay interference (8,13,466,518,591,595). This fact necessitates that all sera sent for Tg measurement should be prescreened for the presence of TgAb (13,34,516). Such screening is essential because even very low serum TgAb concentrations can produce significant interference with Tg measurement. Moreover, because a patient’s TgAb status may change over time, such prescreening must be performed on all test samples (8,13,466,518,520,591,595-597). Current guidelines recommend screening for interfering TgAb using a TgAb immunoassay rather than an exogenous Tg recovery test because Tg recoveries have been shown to be unreliable for detecting interfering TgAb (8,13,16,34,516,598).

TgAb in the circulation interferes with serum Tg measurements in a qualitative, quantitative and method-dependent manner (466,599,600). Interference with IMA methodology is always unidirectional (underestimation), whereas RIA methods have the potential to either under- or overestimating Tg depending on the affinity and specificity of the antibody reagents that affect the partitioning of the Tg tracer between Tg antibody reagent and the endogenous TgAb (8,16,466,591,599-604). Some Tg IMA methods have claimed to overcome TgAb interference by using monoclonal antibodies directed against specific epitopes not involved in thyroid autoimmunity (605). Although conceptually attractive, this approach does not appear to have overcome interferences in practice, possibly because less restricted TgAb epitopes are more often associated with thyroid carcinoma than with the autoimmune thyroid conditions (513,606).

Figure 7 shows the comparison of serum Tg measurements determined in TgAb-negative and TgAb-positive sera when measured by both IMA and RIA methods (8,547). Although all the methods were standardized against the same certified reference preparation CRM-457, significant biases were observed reflecting assay specificity differences. As seen in Figure 6b, serum samples containing TgAb typically displayed a detectable Tg RIA value while a lower or even undetectable serum Tg values when measured using IMA methods. In fact, this RIA/IMA discordance appears to serve as the most reliable and sensitive indicator of TgAb interference (563). The mechanism responsible for the inappropriately low IMA values most likely represents the inability of Tg complexed with TgAb from participating in the two-site reaction of IMA methods (600,607). In contrast, RIA methods report fewer inappropriately low or undetectable Tg values for TgAb-positive sera because they likely measure both free Tg and Tg complexed with TgAb (8,466,608). In accord with current guidelines, a serum Tg value should not be reported for a TgAb-positive specimen if measured by an IMA method (13). Unfortunately, many laboratories that are solely using IMA methods still report falsely undetectable serum Tg values for TgAb-positive patients, albeit with a cautionary comment. On the other hand, other laboratories are adopting what appears to be a much better approach to this problem by restricting the use of the IMA methods to TgAb-negative sera while employing RIA methodology for TgAb-positive sera. Clinical studies are needed to determine whether the new Tg LC-MS/MS methods are useful for monitoring serum Tg in TgAb-positive patients (12,17).

(iii) The Use of Serum TgAb as a Surrogate Tumor Marker for DTC Approximately 20 percent of DTC patients present with detectable TgAb as compared with ~11 percent of the general population (289,466,518,521,591). As to whether the presence of serum TgAb can serve as a marker for DTC preoperatively remains a controversial subject (609-612). However, there has been growing recognition that postoperatively, serial TgAb measurements can serve as a surrogate tumor marker (Figure 5) (13,466,502,520-522,524,591,613,614). Supporting this view is the finding that patients who have serum TgAb detected at the time of initial surgery and who are rendered disease-free, show a progressive decline in serum TgAb levels that become undetectable over a median period of three years (466,520,522,524,614). In contrast, patients with persistent/recurrent disease typically maintain detectable and often exhibit rising TgAb concentrations in association with tumor recurrences (466,518,520,522,591). Because serum TgAb tests significantly differ in both sensitivity and specificity, it is essential that serial TgAb measurements be performed employing the same method (8,23,465,466,503,505,511,615).

(b) The Use of Serial Serum Tg for Monitoring Patients with DTC

Over the past decade, the reported incidence of DTC has substantially risen as small thyroid nodules and micropapillary cancers have increasingly been detected, presumably due to the widespread use of ultrasound and other imaging techniques (616,617). Although most DTC patients appear to be rendered disease-free by their initial surgery, approximately 15 percent of patients may experience recurrences and approximately 5 percent die from disease-related complications (618,619). The majority of persistent/recurrent disease is detected within the first five years following surgery, however, recurrences may occur decades after initial surgery thereby necessitating long-term monitoring (618). Because most patients have a low pre-test probability for disease, it is critical that protocols for follow-up have a high negative predictive value (NPV) to eliminate unnecessary testing and a high positive predictive value (PPV) to identify the minority of patients with persistent/recurrent disease. Because diagnostic whole body radioiodine scans have now become recognized to be a relatively insensitive method for the detection of early tumor recurrence, serial serum Tg measurements performed in conjunction with ultrasound examination has evolved as the central strategy for monitoring patients for this purpose (34,38,516,583,620). The current technical issues concerning serum Tg assays, such as assay bias, functional sensitivity and interference require close physician-laboratory cooperation in order to optimize the use of serial serum Tg testing for this purpose [Section 6a].

Four principal factors appear to influence the interpretation of serum Tg concentrations: (1) The mass of differentiated thyroid tissue present (normal tissue + tumor); (2) The intrinsic characteristics of the tumor tissue that influence the ability to secrete Tg; (3) The presence of any inflammation of, or injury to, thyroid tissue, such as observed following fine needle aspiration biopsy, surgery, radioiodine therapy or thyroiditis; and (4) The degree of thyroid tissue stimulation of TSH receptors by TSH, hCG or TSAb (13).

Serum Tg measurement may be useful in the context of the following four phases of managing patients with DTC:

(a) Pre-operative Serum Tg

Current guidelines do not routinely recommend pre-operative serum Tg measurement (34,38,516). However, some investigators believe that such a pre-operative serum Tg (drawn before or more than two weeks after a FNAB) provides useful information as to the tumor’s intrinsic ability to secrete Tg when cancer is present, because some tumors, especially those containing the BRAF mutation display reduced expression of Tg protein (621). This obviously impacts the utility of using serial serum Tg measurements to serve as a tumor marker to detect cancer recurrence post-operatively (622,623). The principle rationale for such a pre-operative serum Tg determination is a follows: The average serum Tg concentration for a normal euthyroid adult approximates ~12 µg/L such that one gram of normal thyroid tissue would likely account for about 1-2 µg/L of serum Tg from a normal thyroid gland size of 10-20 grams. Such a relationship would presumably hold for patients presenting with DTC with serum TSH within the euthyroid reference range and no other intrinsic thyroid pathology that might independently influence Tg secretion (13,575). Approximately 50 percent of DTC patients have an elevated preoperative serum Tg. The highest preoperative serum Tg concentrations are seen in Follicular > Hurthle > Papillary (624). Some studies have shown that an elevated serum Tg, even decades prior to diagnosis, is a risk factor for thyroid malignancy (625-628). This suggests that most DTCs secrete significant amounts of Tg protein to an equal or greater degree than normal thyroid tissue and underscores its importance as a useful tumor marker (624). However, it also indicates that as much as one-third of DTC’s may be so-called “poor Tg secretors” when considering the mass of tumor present. In this latter case, the use of serial postoperative serum Tg as a tumor marker may prove to be a relatively insensitive method for the detection of early tumor recurrence (621,629). It also would underscore the importance of employing total thyroidectomy to reduce the background noise from Tg being secreted by surgical remnant tissue and the use of a more sensitive second generation Tg assay [Section 6a(ii)] combined with ultrasound examination in the management of such cases. Thus, a preoperative Tg may play a useful role in establishing the postoperative management plan for the individual thyroid cancer patient.

(b) Early post-operative period – First year

Because the TSH status of the patient exerts such a strong influence on Tg secretion and circulating Tg concentrations, it is important that the patient be promptly placed on adequate oral L-T4 or L-T3 suppression therapy following surgery for DTC to facilitate establishing a stable serum Tg baseline to serve as a reference for long-term monitoring for tumor recurrence. Serum Tg measurements performed even as early as 6 to 8 weeks after thyroidectomy have been shown to have prognostic value, in that the higher the postoperative Tg the greater the likelihood that persistent disease is present (562,577,630-637). Since the half-life of Tg in the circulation approximates 3 days, the acute injury-related Tg release resulting from the surgical procedure should largely resolve within the first two months. If thyroid hormone therapy (either L-T3 or L-T4) is initiated immediately post-operatively to prevent the rise in TSH, by 8 weeks the serum Tg should be approaching a nadir value reflecting secretion from the post-surgical normal thyroid remnant as well as any residual or metastatic thyroid tumor present. As most surgeons performing near-total thyroidectomy leave an approximately 1-gram normal remnant tissue (638), secretion from this remnant tissue should result in a serum Tg concentration ≤ 2 µg/L if serum TSH is not elevated (13). A recent study using a receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis indicates that a 6-week serum Tg of ~1.0 µg/L, measured during TSH suppression had a 98 percent negative predictive value (NPV) (although the positive predictive value (PPV) was only 43 percent) (562). However both NPV and PPV could be maximized by following trends in serum Tg measured over time in preference to using a single fixed Tg cut-off value as a risk factor for residual/recurrent disease (549,562,639,640). The finding that using a fixed Tg cut-off has a low PPV underscores the advisability of restaging using combined serum Tg and ultrasound evaluations during the initial 6 to 12 months following initial surgery (562).

(c)  Long-term monitoring during L-T4 Therapy

Current evidence indicates that the higher the basal serum Tg seen post-operatively (while on L-T4 suppression therapy) the greater the likelihood that the patient will have persistent or recurrent disease present (562,577,630-636). If serum TSH is maintained with L-T4 therapy at modestly suppressed levels (0.1 – 0.4 mIU/L), changes observed in the serum Tg concentration over time will reflect changes in tumor mass. In this context, when a stable TSH status is maintained (using the same L-T4 dose) a rising serum Tg would be considered suspicious for tumor recurrence, whereas a declining Tg levels suggests the absence or regression of disease (34,516,549,562,639). In fact, it is the trend in serum Tg, measured over time and under constant TSH conditions, that has proven to have a higher diagnostic sensitivity than using a fixed serum Tg cut-off value, especially when measured using a sensitive 2nd generation assay (549,562,572,639,641-645). Assay imprecision can result from variability in reagents supplied by the manufacturer, differences between instrument calibrations and a myriad of less well-defined factors. One approach directed at mitigating between-run imprecision has been to concurrently measure (in the same assay) an archived serum specimen from the patient alongside the current specimen (570). By eliminating run-to-run imprecision, even small increases in serum Tg may be validated.
The archiving of unused sera facilitates concurrent re-measurement of a past with the current specimen – an approach that can be used to eliminate between-run errors and more reliably detect a small but clinically significant serum Tg trend (570).

(d)  Serum Tg responses to TSH Stimulation

The degree of tumor differentiation determines the presence and density of TSH receptors that in large part is responsible the magnitude of the serum Tg rise with TSH stimulation (621,629,646). Although the rise in serum Tg in response to increases in endogenous TSH following thyroid hormone withdrawal is twice that seen following rhTSH administration (34,516,583,647,648), rhTSH has increasingly used to stimulate serum Tg because it lends itself to a standardized procedure while avoiding the side-effects of producing hypothyroidism (649).  When using insensitive Tg methodology, rhTSH-stimulated serum Tg measurement was used when patients had an undetectable basal Tg below the functional sensitivity of 1st generation Tg tests (functional sensitivity ~ 1.0 µg/L) (34,38,516). Studies established a consensus rhTSH-stimulated serum Tg cut-off of 2.0 µg/L, measured 72 hours after the second dose of rhTSH, as a risk factor for disease having a higher NPV (> 95 percent) than a basal (unstimulated) Tg measurement (562,577,582,583,620,635,639,641,643,644,650). However, an rhTSH-stimulated Tg below 2.0 µg/L does not guarantee the absence of tumor (583,647,650). Furthermore, the reliability of any fixed rhTSH-Tg cut-off is negatively impacted by the variability in numeric values reported by different methods (8,554), differences in the dose of rhTSH delivered related to the absorption from the injection site, surface are and age of the patient (651-654) and most importantly, the TSH sensitivity of the tumor tissue (621,646,655). In fact, more recent studies using more sensitive 2nd generation assays (functional sensitivity ≤ 0.10 µg/L) have reported that a basal Tg value below 0.10 µg/L has a comparable NPV to a rhTSH-stimulated Tg of < 2.0 µg/L (547, 554, 557, 572, 573, 578, 579, 581). As seen in Figure 7a, a strong relationship exists between basal Tg and rhTSH-stimulated Tg values (547,557) . This dictates that the likelihood of the serum Tg rising above the customary cut-off of 2.0 ng/mL (µg/L) in response to rhTSH stimulation is directly proportional to basal Tg (Figure 7b). This has prompted a controversy regarding whether an rhTSH-stimulated serum Tg value provides any additional information over and above that of basal Tg measured by a 2nd generation assay (547, 554, 557, 573, 578, 579, 581). Another important caveat to rhTSH-stimulated Tg testing is the typically blunting or absence of a rhTSH-stimulated Tg response characteristic of TgAb-positive patients (547). One explanation offered for this phenomenon is that the failure of the typical ten-fold rhTSH response results as a consequence enhanced metabolic clearance of the Tg-TgAb complexes (526,604,656).

figure 7

(e) Serum Tg Reference Ranges

Because most serum Tg testing is made for thyroidectomized DTC patients in whom the target TSH is determined based on patient-specific risk for recurrence, the euthyroid reference range of the assay is only relevant for assessing whether the preoperative serum Tg is elevated [Section 6b(i)]. As discussed in Section 6a(i), Tg methods can report 2 to 3 fold differences in numeric values due to differences in standardization and specificity, and this leads to different reference ranges for different methods (8,547,554). When evaluating a thyroidectomized DTC patient, the reference range of the assay should be adjusted relative to thyroid mass and TSH status of the patient (13).

Serum Tg should be detectable in all normal euthyroid subjects in whom there is no circulating TgAb that might interfere with its detection. Although normal Tg secretion by the thyroid gland appears, in part, to be dependent on the stimulatory action of TSH, the quantity of Tg normally secreted appears to vary widely as reflected by the wide normal serum Tg reference range varying approximately from 3 – 40 ng/mL (µg/L), when assays are standardized directly against the International Reference Preparation CRM-457. Despite this variability, individual serum Tg values of euthyroid normal subjects characteristically remain remarkably constant over time with within-person CV approximating 15 percent (360,564). However, the suppression of TSH by oral thyroid hormone therapy will predictably produce an approximately 50 percent reduction (575). Patients who have received a lobectomy and subsequently have been maintained on TSH suppression should be evaluated using a range of 0.75 – 10 ng/mL (µg/L), while the typical 1-2 gram thyroid remnant remaining after near-total thyroidectomy would be expected to produce a serum Tg below 2 ng/ml with a suppressed TSH. By this same line of reasoning, truly athyreotic patients would be expected to have no Tg detected irrespective of their TSH status (13).

(f)  Tg Measurements made in FNA Needle Saline Washouts

Because Tg protein is tissue-specific, the detection of Tg in non-thyroidal tissues or fluids (such as pleural fluid) indicates the presence of metastatic thyroid cancer (542). Struma ovarii is the only (rare) condition in which the source of Tg in the circulation does not originate from the thyroid (657). Cystic thyroid nodules are commonly encountered in clinical practice, the large majority arising from follicular epithelium and the minority from parathyroid epithelium. A high concentration of Tg or parathyroid hormone (PTH) measured in the cyst fluid provides a reliable indicator of the tissue origin of the cyst that can often aid the decision for possible surgical management (542). Lymph node metastases are found in up to 50 percent of patients with papillary cancers and 20 percent of follicular cancers (658-660). High-resolution ultrasound has now become an important component of the protocols used for postoperative surveillance for recurrence (34,516). Although ultrasound characteristics are helpful for distinguishing benign reactive lymph nodes from those suspicious for malignancy, the finding of Tg in the needle washout of a lymph node biopsy has higher diagnostic accuracy than the ultrasound appearance (661-669). The current protocol for obtaining such samples recommends rinsing the FNA needle in 1.0 mL of saline and sending this specimen to the laboratory for Tg analysis. This procedure is now widely accepted as a useful adjunctive test for improving the diagnostic sensitivity of the cytological evaluation of a suspicious lymph node or thyroid mass (661-667). The FNA needle washout procedure has recently been extended to measure Calcitonin in neck masses of patients with primary and metastatic medullary thyroid cancer (670-672). In addition, when using ultrasound to evaluate the thyroidectomized patient, the measurement of PTH in an FNA needle washout can be useful in distinguishing lymph nodes from parathyroid tissue.

(c) Thyroid Specific mRNA used as a Tumor Marker

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) has been used to detect thyroid specific mRNAs (Tg, TSHR, TPO and NIS) in the peripheral blood of patients with DTC (673-675). Initial studies suggested that circulating Tg mRNA might be employed as a useful tumor marker for thyroid cancer, especially in TgAb-positive patients in whom Tg measurements were subject to assay interference (676). More recently, this approach has been applied to the detection of NIS, TPO and TSH receptor (TSHR) mRNA (677-679). Although some studies have suggested that these thyroid specific mRNA measurements could be useful for cancer diagnosis and detecting recurrent disease, most studies have concluded that they offer no advantages over sensitive serum Tg measurements (680,681). Further, the recent report of false positive Tg mRNA results in patients with congenital athyreosis (682) suggests that Tg mRNA can arise as an assay artifact originating from non-thyroid tissues, or illegitimate transcription (683,684). Conversely, false negative Tg mRNA results have also been observed in patients with documented metastatic disease (685-687). Although Tg, TSHR, NIS and TPO are generally considered “thyroid specific” proteins, mRNAs for these antigens have been detected in a number of non-thyroidal tissues such as lymphocytes, leukocytes, kidney, hepatocytes, brown fat and skin (390,688-693). Additional sources of variability in mRNA analyses relate to the use of primers that detect splice variants, sample-handling techniques that introduce variability, and difficulties in quantifying the mRNA detected (680,685). There is now a general consensus is that mRNA measurements presently lack the optimal specificity and practicality to be useful tumor markers (680). Finally, the growing number of reports of functional TSH receptors and Tg mRNA present in non-thyroidal tissues further suggests that these mRNA measurements will have limited clinical utility in the management of DTC in the future (390,691-693).

7. Interferences with Thyroid Test Methodologies

It is difficult for the laboratory to proactively detect interference from a single measurement such as an isolated TSH test. It is more common for the physician to suspect assay interference when a reported value is inconsistent with the clinical status of the patient (694). In this context it is important to note that classic laboratory checks of analyte identity, such as dilution, may not always detect an interference problem (695). The most practical way to investigate a possible interference is to test the specimen by a different manufacturer’s method and check for discordance between the test results. This approach is effective because methods vary in their susceptibility to interfering substances (696). Occasionally, a biological check can be made using TRH-stimulation or thyroid hormone suppression to check a suspect TSH, or rhTSH stimulation to validate a suspect Tg (247,557). Interferences producing a falsely elevated TSH or Tg values will usually be associated with a blunted (<2-fold increase) to stimulation responses, or in the case of TSH less than the expected 90 percent suppression 48 hours following the oral administration of 1mg of L-T4 or 200µg L-T3 (247).

There are four classes of assay interference: (a) crossreactivity problems, (b) endogenous autoantibodies targeting the analyte, (c) heterophilic (animal) antibody, most commonly human anti-mouse antibody (HAMA) interference with assay reagents and (d) in vivo or in vitro drug interactions (697,698).

(a) Cross-reactivity Problems

The specificity of an immunoassay depends on the ability of the antibody reagent to discriminate flawlessly between the analyte and structurally related ligands (699). TSH assays are more likely to be affected by such cross-reactivity problems than thyroid hormone tests where chemically pure iodothyronine preparations are available for selecting antibody specificity. However the use of monoclonal antibodies for developing TSH IMA methods has virtually eliminated the cross-reactivity problems with other glycoprotein hormones (LH or hCG) that plagued the early TSH RIA methods (237). However, because each monoclonal antibody reagent differ in its specificity for recognizing various circulating TSH isoforms, these antibody differences can result in the reporting of TSH values that may be altered by as much as 1.0 mIU/L for the same serum specimen (334,335).

(b) Endogenous Antibodies

In 1956 Robbins and colleagues first reported an unusual thyroxine binding protein globulin in serum that proved to be the result of an autoantibody (18). Subsequently, both T4 and T3 as well as TSH autoantibodies have been identified in sera from patients with autoimmune thyroid and nonthyroid disorders [Section 3Dc] (700-705). Although there are numerous reports of anomalous total and free thyroid hormone as well as TSH test values resulting from T3, T4 or TSH autoantibodies, these autoantibodies now only rarely cause interference with current methods (191,406,704,707). When it does occur, such endogenous antibody interferences are characterized by either falsely low or falsely high values, depending on the type and composition of the assay method employed (703,708,709). In contrast, the common occurrence of autoantibodies directed against thyroglobulin (TgAb) still cause major problems with serum Tg measurement, as discussed in Section 7(e).

(a) Heterophile Antibodies (HAb)/ Human Anti-Mouse Antibodies (HAMA)

HAb represents a group of relatively weak multispecific, polyreactive antibodies with specificity for poorly defined antigens that react with immunoglobulins derived from two or more species (170,191,706,710-712). Most frequently such HAb interferences result from IgM Rheumatoid Factor or Human Anti-Mouse Antibodies (HAMA) (711). Immunometric assay (IMA) methods that use monoclonal antibodies of murine origin are more prone to HAMA interference than competitive immunoassays because HAMA in the specimen is able to form a bridge between the capture and signal antibody reagents and creates a false signal that is reported as a falsely high value (556,713). Even the use of chimeric antibodies does not appear to overcome this form of antibody interference inappropriate value may not necessarily be abnormal but may be inappropriately normal relative to clinical status (714-716). Although in most cases interference is detected as a false positive result, false negative interferences have been reported for Troponin 1 and Thyroglobulin (556,558,717). Failure to recognize such interferences can result in unnecessary additional diagnostic testing or even unnecessary surgeries (718). Since antibodies cross the placenta, these HAb’s have the potential to interfere with the diagnostic accuracy of neonatal screening tests (719). Although the prevalence of interfering antibodies can be as high as 30-50 percent, manufacturers typically develop their assays to include reagents that block or neutralize most interferences (561,720-722). The prevalence of such interference is difficult to estimate employing present methodologies but it is currently estimated to range between 0.03 and 3.0 percent (556,721). Despite the measures used by manufacturers to neutralize interferences due to HAMA, this type of interference continues to be infrequently encountered in clinical practice, especially when patients have been exposed to animal proteins through vocational, diagnostic or therapeutic routes. Because the potential for interference is unique to a particular patient’s specimen, such interference will not be identified by the laboratory’s routine quality assurance checks. Thus, both the clinician and the laboratory must be aware of this possibility when an apparently inappropriate test result is encountered. Although assays for HAMA detection have been developed, inter-method differences are so large that these tests are not considered to be reliable enough for interference screening (723,724).

(d) Drug Interferences:

Drug interferences may cause in-vitro or in-vivo effects on thyroid tests and/or thyroid function (66,70,187,725-727). In-vitro effects result when the specimen contains a sufficient concentration of certain therapeutic and diagnostic agents to produce methodologic interference (14,66,725). Drugs can also have in vivo effects on thyroid function by altering TSH, thyroid hormone secretion and/or thyroid hormone metabolism (70,726).

(a) Drugs that Affect Thyroid Tests in Euthyroid Patients
(i) Drugs affecting TSH measurements
Suppression of serum TSH concentrations can directly result from Glucocorticoid therapies (prednisone ≥ 20mg qd; hydrocortisone 100 mg qd or dexamethasone ≥ 0.5 mg qd), whereas high dose Salicylate (2000 µM) or Furosemide (3-30 µM/≥ 80 mg iv) therapies can cause TSH suppression by displacing of T4 from TBG (136,725,726,728-730). Octreotide (≥100 µg qd) and Dopamine cause suppression in TSH secretion as a consequence of binding to their respective receptors on thyrotropes. In fact, in hospitalized patients TSH elevations resulting from hypothyroidism may be completely masked by Dopamine infusions for treatment of hypotension (731). Conversely, increased TSH can be associated with Dopamine antagonists, Amphetamine, IL-2 or Theophylline treatments (187,732).

(ii) Drugs affecting TT4 and FT4 immunoassays
A number of drugs cause hypothyroxinemia in euthyroid patients by decreasing TBG concentrations (Androgens, Niacin); decreasing T4 binding to TBG (high dose Salicylates and Phenytoin); and/or increase T4 metabolism (Carbamazepine, Phenobarbitol and Phenytoin) (70). Other drugs may cause hyperthyroxinemia in euthyroid patients by increasing TBG (Clofibrate, Estrogen, 5FU, Heroin/Methadone) (27,725,726). Other drugs raise circulating T4 levels by inhibiting T4 to T3 conversion (Amiodarone, Iopanoic acid and Propranolol). In patients receiving heparin treatment there can be a transient increase in T4 as a result liberation of lipoprotein lipase from vascular endothelium resulting in increased concentrations of non-esterified fatty acids thereby displacing thyroid hormones from TBG. This process can also occur in vitro during sample storage at ambient temperature and is accentuated at low albumin concentrations (27,138,726,733). Therefore, total T4 and T3 measurements are more reliable tests than FT4 and FT3 for assessing thyroid hormone status in patients receiving heparin therapy (726). In certain pathologic conditions such as uremia, abnormal serum constituents such as indole acetic acid may accumulate and interfere with thyroid hormone binding (734). Thyroid test methods employing fluorescent signals may be sensitive to the presence of fluorophor-related therapeutic or diagnostic agents in the specimen (735) (736,737).

(iii) Drugs affecting thyroid function
Many commonly prescribed medications interfere with thyroid function or thyroid test results (70). Drugs that can cause hypothyroidism include (Aminoglutethamide, Amiodarone, Cytokines (Interferon, IL-2, TNF, TgF), Lithium, Iodine-containing agents and Retinoids/Vitamin A) (70,738,739). Under other circumstances Amiodarone, Iodine-containing agents and Cytokines induce thyroiditis and hyperthyroidism in some patients (70,489,740,741). Patients with any pre-treatment history of a thyroid condition or positive thyroid antibodies are also more prone to develop thyroid dysfunction some time after initiating such drug therapies (742).

8. Automation of Thyroid Tests

Radioimmunoassay methods are difficult to automate since they require a physical separation of antibody-bound from free tracer. However, once homogeneous methods based on monoclonal antibodies were developed, significant progress was made in automating thyroid test immunoassays. The current trend in automation is geared towards high-throughput, modular, robotic systems that incorporate both immunoassay and clinical chemistry analyzers into one instrument (266,743,744). Most recently, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods have been developed to measure total and free thyroid hormones as well as Thyroglobulin. These techniques however are technically complex and cannot be automated because they involve specimen pretreatments (11,12,17,33,745).  Tests for TT4, TT3, THBR, TSH, Tg, TPOAb and TgAb using non-isotopic (primarily chemiluminescent) signals are currently available on a variety of immunoassay analyzer platforms that employ bar-coding, multiple-analyte random-access, primary tube sampling, autodilution, STAT testing and computerized data output (25,744,746,747). Laboratories primarily select an analyzer to perform thyroid testing on the basis of instrument menu and operating costs, and only secondarily recognize that there are differences in the functional performance of different methods. Although the move to automation is seen as cost-effective, the consolidation of a diversity of immunoassay tests onto one platform has led to a transfer of thyroid testing from small, specialized laboratories to the general chemistry laboratory setting. This centralization has resulted in a loss of laboratory expertise for the clinically interpretation of thyroid tests. This has negatively impacted the ability of laboratory staff to discuss reasons for discordant test results with physicians. Current trends towards point-of-care testing using miniaturized and biosensor technology would appear to bring laboratory personnel closer to the patient (748,749). However, near-patient testing is only more cost-effective when immediate diagnosis and therapy reduces hospitalization costs (748). Since most thyroid disease is treated on an outpatient basis, point-of-care thyroid tests are unlikely to replace centralized automated thyroid testing.


1.         Chaney AL 1958 Protein-bound iodine. Adv Clin Chem 1:82-89

2.         Benotti J, Benotti N 1963 Protein-bound iodine, total iodine and butanol extractable iodine by partial automation. Clin Chem 9:408-416

3.         Chopra IJ, Ho RS, Lam R 1972 An improved radioimmunoassay of triiodothyronine in serum: Its application to clinical and physiological studies. J Lab Clin Med 80:729-?

4.         Van Herle AJ, Uller RP, Matthews NL, Brown J 1973 Radioimmunoassay for measurement of thyroglobulin in human serum. J Clin Invest 52:1320-1327

5.         Nicoloff J SC 1990 Use and misuse of the sensitive thyrotropin assays. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 71:553-558

6.         Ekins RP 1998 Ligand assays: from electrophoresis to miniaturized microarrays. Clin Chem 44:2015-2030

7.         Spencer CA, LoPresti JS, Patel A, Guttler RB, Eigen A, Shen D, Nicoloff JT 1990 Applications of a new chemiluninometric thyrotropin assay to subnormal measurement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70:453-460

8.         Spencer CA, Bergoglio LM, Kazarosyan M, Fatemi S, Lopresti JS 2005 Clinical Impact of Thyroglobulin (Tg) and Tg autoantibody Method Differences on the Management of patients with Differentiated Thyroid Carcinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90

9.         Kahric-Janicic N, Soldin SJ, Soldin OP, West T, Gu J, Jonklaas J 2007 Tandem mass spectrometry improves the accuracy of free thyroxine measurements during pregnancy. Thyroid 17:303-311

10.       Thienpont LM, Beastall G, Christofides ND, Faix JD, Ieiri T, Jarrige V, Miller WG, Miller R, Nelson JC, Ronin C, Ross HA, Rottmann M, Thijssen JH, Toussaint B 2007 Proposal of a candidate international conventional reference measurement procedure for free thyroxine in serum. Clin Chem Lab Med 45:934-936

11.       van Deventer HE, Mendu DR, Remaley AT, Soldin SJ 2011 Inverse log-linear relationship between thyroid-stimulating hormone and free thyroxine measured by direct analog immunoassay and tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Chem 57:122-127

12.       Clarke NJ, Zhang Y, Reitz RE 2012 A novel mass spectrometry-based assay for the accurate measurement of thyroglobulin from patient samples containing antithyroglobulin autoantibodies. J Investig Med 60:1157-1163

13.       Baloch Z, Carayon P, Conte-Devolx B, Demers LM, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Henry JF, LiVosli VA, Niccoli-Sire P, John R, Ruf J, Smyth PP, Spencer CA, Stockigt JR 2003 Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines:Laboratory Support for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Thyroid Disease. Thyroid 13:1-126

14.       Dufour DR 2007 Laboratory tests of thyroid function: uses and limitations. Endocr Metab Clin North Am 36:155-169

15.       Spencer CA, Takeuchi M, Kazarosyan M 1996 Current status and performance goals for serum thyrotropin (TSH) assays. Clinical Chemistry 42:141-145

16.       Spencer CA, Takeuchi M, Kazarosyan M 1996 Current Status and Performance Goals for Serum Thyroglobulin Assays. Clin Chem 42:164-173

17.       Hoofnagle AN, Becker JO, Wener MH, Heinecke JW 2008 Quantification of thyroglobulin, a low-abundance serum protein, by immunoaffinity peptide enrichment and tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Chem 54:1796-1804

18.       Robbins J 1996 Thyroid hormone transport proteins and the physiology of hormone binding .

19.       Feldt-Rasmussen U 1996 Analytical and clinical performance goals for testing autoantibodies to thyroperoxidase, thyroglobulin and thyrotropin receptor. Clin Chem 42:160-163

20.       Kamijo K 2007 TSH-receptor antibodies determined by the first, second and third generation assays and thyroid-stimulating antibody in pregnant patients with Graves’ disease. Endocr J 54:619-624

21.       Ajjan RA, Weetman AP 2008 Techniques to quantify TSH receptor antibodies. Nat  Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 4:461-468

22.       Kamijo K, Murayama H, Uzu T, Togashi K, Olivo PD, Kahaly GJ 2011 Similar clinical performance of a novel chimeric thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor bioassay and an automated thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor binding assay in Graves’ disease. Thyroid 21:1295-1299

23.       Spencer C, Petrovic I, Fatemi S 2011 Current thyroglobulin autoantibody (TgAb) assays often fail to detect interfering TgAb that can result in the reporting of falsely low/undetectable serum Tg IMA values for patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. . J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:1283-1291

24.       Giuliani C, Cerrone D, Harii N, Thornton M, Kohn LD, Dagia NM, Bucci I, Carpentieri M, Di Nenno B, Di Blasio A, Vitti P, Monaco F, Napolitano G 2012 A TSHR-LH/CGR chimera that measures functional thyroid-stimulating autoantibodies (TSAb) can predict remission or recurrence in Graves’ patients undergoing antithyroid drug (ATD) treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:1080-1087

25.       Demers LM 1999 Thyroid function testing and automation. J Clin Ligand Assay 22:38-41

26.       Nelson JC, Wilcox RB 1996 Analytical performance of free and total thyroxine assays. Clin Chem 42:146-154

27.       Stockigt JR 2001 Free thyroid hormone measurement. A critical appraisal. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 30:265-289

28.       Thienpont LM, Van Uytfanghe K, Marriott J, Stokes P, Siekmann L, Kessler A, Bunk D, Tai S 2005 Feasibility study of the use of frozen human sera in split-sample comparison of immunoassays with candidate reference measurement procedures for total thyroxine and total triiodothyronine measurements. Clin Chem 51:2303-2311

29.       Soldin OP, Soldin SJ 2011 Thyroid hormone testing by tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Biochem 44:89-94

30.       Steele BW, Wang E, Klee GG, Thienpont LM, Soldin SJ, Sokoll LJ, Winter WE, Fuhrman SA, Elin RJ 2005 Analytic bias of thyroid function tests: analysis of a College of American Pathologists fresh frozen serum pool by 3900 clinical laboratories. Arch Pathol Lab Med 129:310-317

31.       Beckett G, MacKenzie F 2007 Thyroid guidelines – are thyroid-stimulating hormone assays fit for purpose? Ann Clin Biochem 44:203-208

32.       Fritz KS, Wilcox RB, Nelson JC 2007 Quantifying spurious free T4 results attributable to thyroxine-binding proteins in serum dialysates and ultrafiltrates. Clin Chem 53:985-988

33.       Thienpont LM, Van Uytfanghe K, Beastall G, Faix JD, Ieiri T, Miller WG, Nelson JC, Ronin C, Ross HA, Thijssen JH, Toussaint B 2010 Report of the IFCC Working Group for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests; part 1: thyroid-stimulating hormone. Clin Chem 56:902-911

34.       Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, Kloos RT, Lee SL, Mandel SJ, Mazzaferri EL, McIver B, Pacini F, Schlumberger M, Sherman SI, Steward DL, Tuttle RM 2009 Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 19:1167-1124

35.       Van Houcke SK, Van Uytfanghe K, Shimizu E, Tani W, Umemoto M, Thienpont LM 2012 IFCC international conventional reference procedure for the measurement of free thyroxine in serum: International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) Working Group for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests (WG-STFT)(1). Clin Chem Lab Med 49:1275-1281

36.       Van Houcke SK, Thienpont LM 2012 “Good samples make good assays” – the problem of sourcing clinical samples for a standardization project. Clin Chem Lab Med 49:in press

37.       Baskin HJ, Cobin RH, Duick DS, Gharib H, Guttler RB, Kaplan MM, Segal RL 2002 American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the evaluation and treatment of hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism. Endocr Pract 8:457-469

38.       Pacini F, Schlumberger M, Dralle H, Elisei R, Smit JW, Wiersinga W 2006 European consensus for the management of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma of the follicular epithelium. Eur J Endocrinol 154:787-803

39.       Stagnaro-Green A, Abalovich M, Alexander E, Azizi F, Mestman J, Negro R, Nixon A, Pearce EN, Soldin OP, Sullivan S, Wiersinga W 2011 Guidelines of the American Thyroid Association for the diagnosis and management of thyroid disease during pregnancy and postpartum. Thyroid 21:1081-1125

40.       De Groot L, Abalovich M, Alexander EK, Amino N, Barbour L, Cobin RH, Eastman CJ, Lazarus JH, Luton D, Mandel SJ, Mestman J, Rovet J, Sullivan S 2012 Management of Thyroid Dysfunction during Pregnancy and Postpartum: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:2543-2565

41.       Bartalena L, Bogazzi F, Brogioni S, Burelli A, Scarcello G, Martino E 1996 Measurement of serum free thyroid hormone concentrations: an essential tool for the diagnosis of thyroid dysfunction. Horm Res 45:142-147

42.       Lee RH, Spencer CA, Mestman JH, Miller EA, Petrovic I, Braverman LE, Goodwin TM 2009 Free T4 immunoassays are flawed during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200:e1-6

43.       Ekins RP 1960 Estimation of T4 in human plasma by an electrophoretic technique. Clin Chim Acta 5:453-459

44.       Murphy BP 1965 The determination of thyroxine by competitive protein-binding analysis employing an anion-exchange resin and radiothyroxine. J Lab Clin Med 66:161-167

45.      Murphy BEP, Pattee CJ 1966 Clinical evaluation of a new method for the determination of serum thyroxine. J Clin Endocrinol 26:247-256

46.       Challand GS, Ratcliffe WA, Ratcliffe JA 1975 Semiautomated radioimmunoassay for total serum thyroxine and triiodothyronine. Clin Chim Acta 60:25-32

47.       Chopra IJ, Taing P, Mikus L 1996 Direct determination of free triiodothyronine (T3) in undiluted serum by equilibrium dialysis/radioimmunoassay. Thyroid 6:255-259

48.       Soukhova N, Soldin OP, Soldin SJ 2004 Isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometric method for T4/T3. Clin Chim Acta 343:185-190

49.       Van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Mohan S, Baxter RC, Veldhuis JD, Bowers CY, Bouillon R 1999 Reactivation of pituitary hormone release and metabolic improvement by infusion of growth hormone-releasing peptide and thyrotropin-releasing hormone in patients with protracted critical illness. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:1311-1323

50.       Hufner M, Hesch RD 1973 A comparison of different compounds for TBG-blocking used in radioimmunoassay for triiodothyronine. Clin Chim Acta 44:101-107

51.       Evans SE, Burr WA, Hogan TC 1977 A reassessment of 8-anilino-1-napthalene sulphonic acid as a thyroxine binding inhibitor in the radioimmunoassay of thyroxine. Ann Clin Biochem 14:330-334

52.       Matsuda M, Sakata S, Komaki T, Nakamura s, Kojima N, Takuno H, Miura K 1989 Effect of 8-anilino-1-napthalene sulfonic acid (ANS) on the interaction between thyroid hormone and anti-thyroid hormone antibodies. Clin Chim Acta 185:139-146

53.       Witherspoon LR, El Shami AS, Shuler SE, Neely H, Sonnemaker R, Gilbert SS, Alyea K 1988 Chemically blocked analog assays for fre thyronines . 1. The effect of chemical blockers on T4 analog and T4 binding by albumin and by Thyroxin Binding Globulin. Clin Chem 34:9-16

54.       Gharib H, Ryan RJ, Mayberry WE, Hockert T 1971 Radioimmunoassay for triiodothyronine (T3): 1. Affinity and specificity of the antibody for T3. J Clin Endocrinol 33:509-516

55.       Surks MI, Schadlow Ar, Oppenheimer JH 1972 A new radioimmunoassay for plasma L-triiodothyronine: measurements in thyroid disease and in patients maintained on hormonal replacement. J Clin Invest 51:3104-3113

56.       Patel YC, Burger HG, Morley D, Havlik H 1973 A simplified radioimmunoassay for triiodothyronine. J Clin Endocrinol 36:187-190

57.       Fang VS, Refetoff S 1974 Radioimmunoassay for serum triiodothyronine: evaluation of simple techniques to control interference form binding proteins. Clin Chem 20:1150-1154

58.       Zuchelli GC, Pilo A, Chiesa MR, Piro MA 1984 Progress report on a national quality-control survey of triiodothyronine and thyroxin assay. Clin Chem 30:395-398

59.       Klee GG 1996 Clinical usage recommendations and analytic performance goals for total and free triiodothyronine measurements. Clin Chem 42:155-159

60.       Karapitta CD, Sotiroudis TG, Papadimitriou A, Xenakis A 2001 Homogeneous enzyme immunoassay for triiodothyronine in serum. Clin Chem 47:569-574

61.       Thienpont LM, Fierens C, De Leenheer AP, Przywara L 1999 Isotope dilution-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography/electro-spray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry for the determination of triiodo-L-thyronine in serum. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 13:1924-1931

62.       Steele BW, Wang E, Palmer-Toy DE, Killeen AA, Elin RJ, Klee GG 2005 Total long-term within-laboratory precision of cortisol, ferritin, thyroxine, free thyroxine, and thyroid-stimulating hormone assays based on a College of American Pathologists fresh frozen serum study: do available methods meet medical needs for precision? Arch Pathol Lab Med 129:318-322

63.       Zhou Q, Li S, Li X, Wang W, Wang Z 2006 Comparability of five analytical systems for the determination of triiodothyronine, thyroxine and thyroid-stimulating hormone. Clin Chem Lab Med 44:1363-1366

64.       Bartalena L, Robbins J 1993 Thyroid hormone transport proteins. Clin Lab Med 3:583-598

65.       Abduljabbar M, Al Shahri A, Afifi A 2009 Is umbilical cord blood total thyroxin measurement effective in newborn screening for hypothyroidism? J Med Screen 16:119-123

66.       Surks MI, Sievert R 1995 Drugs and thyroid function. NEJM 333:1688-1694

67.       Cartwright D, O’Shea P, Rajanayagam O, Agostini M, Barker P, Moran C, Macchia E, Pinchera A, John R, Agha A, Ross HA, Chatterjee VK, Halsall DJ 2009 Familial dysalbuminemic hyperthyroxinemia: a persistent diagnostic challenge. Clin Chem 55:1044-1046

68.       Zouwail SA, O’Toole AM, Clark PM, Begley JP 2008 Influence of thyroid hormone autoantibodies on 7 thyroid hormone assays. Clin Chem 54:927-928

69.       Massart C, Elbadii S, Gibassier J, Coignard V, Rasandratana A 2009 Anti-thyroxine and anti-triiodothyronine antibody interferences in one-step free triiodothyronine and free thyroxine immunoassays. Clin Chim Acta 401:175-176

70.       Kundra P, Burman KD 2012 The effect of medications on thyroid function tests. Med Clin North Amer 96:283-295

71.       Burr WA, Evans SE, Lee J, al e 1979 The ratio of thyroxine to thyroxine-binding globulin measurement in the evaluation of thyroid function. Clin Endocrinol 11:333-342

72.       Glinoer D, Fernandez-Deville M, Ermans AM 1978 Use of direct thyroxine-binding globulin measurement in the evaluation of thyroid function. J Endocrinol Invest 1:329-335

73.       Whitworth AS, Midgley JE, Wilkins TA 1982 A comparison of free T4 and the ratio of total T4 to T4-binding globulin in serum through pregnancy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 17:307-313

74.       Tolino A, de Conciliis B, Montemagno U 1985 Thyroid hormones in the human pregnancy. acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 64:557-559

75.       Lao TT, Chin RK, Swaminathan R 1988 Thyroid function in pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 95:880-883

76.       Mandel SJ, Spencer CA, Hollowell JG 2005 Are detection and treatment of thyroid insufficiency in pregnancy feasible? Thyroid 15:44-53

77.       Soldin OP, Tractenberg RE, Soldin SJ 2004 Differences between measurements of T4 and T3 in pregnant and nonpregnant women using isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry and immunoassays: are there clinical implications? Clin Chim Acta 347:61-69

78.       Stagnaro-Green A 2012 Optimal care of the pregnant woman with thyroid disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:2619-2622

79.       Soldin OP, Tractenberg RE, Hollowell JG, Jonklaas J, Janicic N, Soldin SJ 2004 Trimester-specific changes in maternal thyroid hormone, thyrotropin, and thyroglobulin concentrations during gestation: trends and associations across trimesters in iodine sufficiency. Thyroid 14:1084-1090

80.       Ekins R 1990 Measurement of free hormones in blood. Endocrine Rev 11:5-46

81.       Nelson JC, Tomei RT 1989 Dependence of the thyroxin/thyroxin-binding globulin (TBG) ratio and the free thyroxin index on TBG concentrations. Clin Chem 35:541-544

82.       Nelson JC, Wilcox BR, Pandian MR 1992 Dependence of free thyroxine estimates obtained with equilibrium tracer dialysis on the concentration of thyroxine-binding globulin. Clin Chem 38:1294-1300

83.       Nelson JC, Weiss RM, Wilcox RB 1994 Underestimates of serum free thyroxine (T4) concentrations by free T4 immunoassays. J Clin Endocrinol 79:76-79

84.       Midgley JE 2001 Direct and indirect free thyroxine assay methods: theory and practice. Clin Chem 47:1353-1363

85.       Toldy E, Locsei Z, Szabolcs I, Bezzegh A, Kovács GL 2005 Protein interference in thyroid assays: an in vitro study with in vivo consequences. Clin Chim Acta 353:93-104

86.       Uchimura H, Nagataki S, Tabuchi T, Mizuno M, Ingbar SH 1976 Measurements of free Thyroxine: Comparison of per cent of free Thyroxine in diluted and undiluted serum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 42:561-566

87.       Holm SS, Andreasen L, Hansen SH, Faber J, Staun-Olsen P 2002 Influence of adsorption and deproteination on potential free thyroxine reference methods. Clin Chem 48:108-114

88.       Nelson JC, Weiss RM 1985 The effects of serum dilution on free thyroxine (T4) concentration in the low T4 syndrome of nonthyroidal illness. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 61:239-246

89.       Christofides ND, Midgley JE 2009 Inaccuracies in free thyroid hormone measurement by ultrafiltration and tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Chem 55:2228-2229

90.       Ekins R 1993 Analytical measurements of free thyroxine. Clinics Lab Med 13:599-630

91.       Zucchelli GC, Pilo A, Chiesa MR, Masini S 1994 Systematic differences between commercial immunoassays for free thyroxine and free triiodothyronine in an external quality assessment program. Clin Chem 40:1956-1961

92.       Fillée C, Cumps J, Ketelslegers JM 2012 Comparison of three free T4 (FT4) and free T3 (FT3) immunoassays in healthy subjects and patients with thyroid diseases and severe non-thyroidal illnesses. Clin Lab 58:725-736

93.       Jonklaas J, Kahric-Janicic N, Soldin OP, Soldin SJ 2009 Correlations of free thyroid hormones measured by tandem mass spectrometry and immunoassay with thyroid-stimulating hormone across 4 patient populations. Clin Chem 55:1380-1388

94.       Tractenberg RE, Jonklaas J, Soldin SJ 2010 Agreement of immunoassay and tandem mass spectrometry in the analysis of cortisol and free t4: interpretation and implications for clinicians. Int J Anal Chem Article ID 234808:1-7

95.       Sterling K, Brenner MA 1966 Free thyroxine in human serum : simplified measurement with the aid of magnesium precipitation. J Clin Invest 45:153-163

96.       Nelson JC, Tomei RT 1988 A direct equilibrium dialysis/radioimmunoassay method for the measurement of free thyroxin in undiluted serum. Clin Chem 34:1737-1744

97.       Ellis SM, Ekins R 1973 Direct measurement by radioimmunoassay of the free thyroid hormone concentrations in serum. Acta Endocrinol (Suppl) 177:106-

98.       Wang YS, Hershman JM, Pekary EA 1985 Improved ultrafiltration method for simultaneous measurement of free Thyroxin and free Triiodothyronine in serum. Clin Chem 31:517-522

99.       Weeke J, Boye N, Orskov H 1986 Ultrafiltration method for direct radioimmunoassay measurement of free thyroxine and free tri-iodothyronine in serum. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 46:381-389

100.     Tikanoja SH, Liewendahl BK 1990 New ultrafiltration method for free Thyroxin compared with equilibrium dialysis in patients with thyroid dysfunction and nonthyroidal illness. Clin Chem 36:800-804

101.     Fritz KS, Weiss RM, Nelson JC, Wilcox RB 2007 Unequal concentrations of free T3 and free T4 after ultrafiltration. Clin Chem 53:1384-1385

102.     Romelli PB, Pennisi F, Vancheri L 1979 Measurement of free thyroid hormones in serum by column adsorption chromatography and radioimmunoassay. J Endocrinol Invest 2:25-40

103.     Holm SS, Hansen SH, Faber J, Staun-Olsen P 2004 Reference methods for the measurement of free thyroid hormones in blood: evaluation of potential reference methods for free thyroxine. Clin Biochem 37:85-93

104.     Ross HA, Benraad TJ 1992 Is free thyroxine accurately measurable at room temperature? Clin Chem 38:880-886

105.     Wilcox RB, Nelson JC, Tomei RT 1994 Heterogeneity in affinities of serum proteins for thyroxine among patients with non-thyroidal illness as indicated by the serum free thyroxine response to serum dilution. Eur J Endocrinol 131:9-13

106.     Wang R, Nelson JC, Weiss RM, Wilcox RB 2000 Accuracy of free thyroxine measurements across natural ranges of thyroxine binding to serum proteins. Thyroid 10:31-39

107.     Soldin SJ, Soukhova N, Janicic N, Jonklaas J, Soldin OP 2005 The measurement of free thyroxine by isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Chim Acta 358:113-118

108.     Van Uytfanghe K, Stöckl D, Ross HA, Thienpont LM 2006 Use of frozen sera for FT4 standardization: investigation by equilibrium dialysis combined with isotope dilution-mass spectrometry and immunoassay. Clin Chem 52:1817-1821

109.     Ross HA 1978 A dialysis rate method for the measurement of free triiodothyronine and steroid hormones in blood. Experimentia 34:538-539

110.     Weeke J, Orskov H 1975 Ultrasensitive radioimmunoassay for direct determination of free triiodothyronine concentration in serum. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 35:237-244

111.     Levinson SS, Rieder S 1974 Parameters affecting a rapid method in which Sephadex is used to determine the percentage of free thyroxine in serum. Clin Chem 20:1568-1572

112.     Nelson JC, Tomei RT 1988 Direct determination of free thyroxin in undiluted serum by equilibrium dialysis/radioimmunoassay. Clin Chem 34:1737-1744

113.     Gu J, Soldin OP, Soldin SJ 2007 Simultaneous quantification of free triiodothyronine and free thyroxine by isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Biochem 40:1386-1391

114.     Soldin OP, Jang M, Guo T, Soldin SJ 2009 Pediatric reference intervals for free thyroxine and free triiodothyronine. Thyroid 19:699-702

115.     Midgley JE, Christofides ND 2009 Point: legitimate and illegitimate tests of free-analyte assay function. Clin Chem 55:439-441

116.     Wilcox RB, Nelson JC 2009 Counterpoint: legitimate and illegitimate tests of free-analyte assay function: we need to identify the factors that influence free-analyte assay results. Clin Chem 55:442-444

117.     Fritz KS, Wilcox RB, Nelson JC 2007 A direct free thyroxine (T4) immunoassay with the characteristics of a total T4 immunoassay. Clin Chem 53:911-915

118.     Wilke TJ 1983 Free thyroid hormone index, thyroid hormone/thyroxin-binding globulin ratio, triiodothyronine uptake, and thyroxin-binding globulin compared for diagnostic value regarding thyroid function. Clin Chem 29:74-79

119.     Roberts RF, La’ulu SL, Roberts WL 2007 Performance characteristics of seven automated thyroxine and T-uptake methods. Clin Chim Acta 377:248-255

120.     Larsen PR, Alexander NM, Chopra IJ, Hay ID, Hershman JM, Kaplan MM, Mariash CN, Nicoloff JT, Oppenheimer JH, Solomon DH, Surks MI 1987 Revised nomenclature for tests of thyroid hormones and thyroid-related proteins in serum. (Committee on Nomenclature of the American Thyroid Association). Clin Chem 33:2114-2119

121.     Schussler GC, Plager JE 1967 Effect of preliminary purification of 131-Thyroxine on the determination of free thyroxine in serum. J Clin Endocrinol 27:242-250

122.     Litherland PGH, Bromage NR, Hall RA 1982 Thyroxine binding globulin (TBG) and thyroxine binding prealbumin (TBPA) measurement, compared with the conventional T3 uptake in the diagnosis of thyroid disease. Clin Chim Acta 122:345-352

123.     Attwood EC, Atkin GE 1982 The T4: TBG ratio: a re-evaluation with particular reference to low and high serum TBG levels. Ann Clin Biochem 19:101-103

124.     Szpunar WE, Stoffer SS, DiGiulio W 1987 Clinical evaluation of a thyroxine binding globulin assay in calculationg a free thyroxine index in normal, thyroid disease and sick euthyroid patients. J Nucl Med 28:1341-1343

125.     Hamolsky MW, Golodetz A, Freedberg AS 1959 The plasma protein-thyroid hormone complex in man. III Further studies on the use of the in vitro red blood cell uptake of I131-triiodothyronine as a diagnostic test of thyroid function. J Clin Endocrinol 19:103-?

126.     Sterling K, Tabachnick M 1961 Resin uptake of I131-triiodothyronine as a test of thyroid function. J Clin Endocrinol 61:456-464

127.     Clark F, Horn DB 1965 Assessment of thyroid function by the combined use of the serum protein-bound iodine and resin uptake of 131I-triiodothyronine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 25:39-45

128.     Harpen MD, Lee WNP, Siegel JA, Greenfield MA 1982 Serum binding of triiodothyronine: theoretical and practical implications for in vitro triiodothyronine uptake. Endocrinol 110:1732-1739

129.     Faix JD, Rosen HN, Velazquez FR 1995 Indirect estimation of thyroid hormone-binding proteins to calculate free thyroxine index: comparison of nonisotopic methods that use labeled thyroxine (“T-uptake”). Clin Chem 41:41-47

130.     Stockigt JR, Stevens V, White EL, Barlow JW 1983 Unbound analog radioimmunoassays for free thyroxin measure the albumin-bound hormone fraction. Clin Chem 29:1408-

131.     Surks MI, Hupart KH, Pan C, Shapiro LE 1988 Normal free thyroxine in critical nonthyroidal illnesses measured by ultrafiltration of undiluted serum and equilibrium dialysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 67:1031-1038

132.     van der Watt G, Haarburger D, Berman P 2008 Euthyroid patient with elevated serum free thyroxine. Clin Chem 54:1239-1241

133.     Pietras SM, Safer JD 2008 Diagnostic confusion attributable to spurious elevation of both total thyroid hormone and thyroid hormone uptake measurements in the setting of autoantibodies: case report and review of related literature. Endocr Pract 14:738-742

134.     Pannain S, Feldman M, Eiholzer U, Weiss RE, Scherberg NH, Refetoff S 2000 Familial dysalbuminemic hyperthyroxinemia in a Swiss family caused by a mutant albumin (R218P) shows an apparent discrepancy between serum concentration and affinity for thyroxine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:2786-2792

135.     Hoshikawa S, Mori K, Kaise N, Nakagawa Y, Ito S, Yoshida K 2004 Artifactually elevated serum-free thyroxine levels measured by equilibrium dialysis in a pregnant woman with familial dysalbuminemic hyperthyroxinemia. Thyroid 14:155-160

136.     Hawkins RC 1998 Furosemide interference in newer free thyroxine assays. Clin Chem 44:2550-2551

137.     Bayer MF, McDougall IR 1980 Radioimmunoassay of free thyroxine in serum: comparison with clinical findings and results of conventional thyroid function tests. Clin Chem 26:1186-1192

138.     Mendel CM, Frost PH, Kunitake ST, Cavalieri RR 1987 Mechanism of the heparin-induced increase in the concentration of free thyroxine in plasma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 65:1259-

139.     Tokmakjian S, Haines M, Edmonds M 1993 Free thyroxine measured by the Ciba Corning ACS-180 on samples from patients with familial dysalbuminemic hyperthyroxinemia. Clin Chem 39:1748-1749

140.     Sophianopoulos J, Jerkunica I, Lee CN, Sgoutas D 1980 An improved ultrafiltration method for free thyroxine and triiodothyronine in serum. Clin Chem 26:159-162

141.     Sterling K, Hededus A 1962 Free thyroxine in human serum. J Clin Invest 41:1031-1040

142.     Oppenheimer JH, Squef R, Surks MI, Hauer H 1963 Binding of thyroxine by serum proteins evaluated by equilibrium dialysis and electrophoresis techniques. J Clin Invest 42:1769-?

143.     Snyder SM, Cavalieri RR, Ingbar SH 1976 Simultaneous measurement of percentage free thyroxine and triiodothyronine : comparison of equilibrium dialysis and sephadex chromatography. J Nucl Med 17:660-664

144.     Ross HA, Visser JW, der Kinderen PJ, Tertoolen JF, Thijssen JH 1982 A comparative study of free thyroxine estimations. Ann Clin Biochem 19:108-113

145.     Swinkels LM, Ross HA, Benraad TJ 1987 A symmetric dialysis method for the determination of free testosterone in human plasma. Clin Chim Acta 165:341-349

146.     Csako G, Zwieg MH, Glickman J, Ruddel M, J. K 1989 Direct and indirect techniques for free thyroxin compared in patients with nonthyroidal illness. II. Effect of prealbumin, albumin and thyroxin-binding globulin. Clin Chem 35:1655-1662

147.     Olsen T 1979 Free T4, free T3 and free reverse T3 in dialysates of serum. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 39:53-59

148.     Sapin R, Schlienger JL, Gasser F, Noel E, Lioure B, Grunenberger F, Goichot B, Grucker D 2000 Intermethod discordant free thyroxine measurements in bone marrow-transplanted patients. Clin Chem 46:418-422

149.     Sapin R, D’Herbomez M, Schlienger JL 2004 Free thyroxine measured with equilibrium dialysis and nine immunoassays decreases in late pregnancy. Clin Lab 50:581-584

150.     Chan GW, Mandel SJ 2007 Therapy insight: management of Graves’ disease during pregnancy. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 3:470-478

151.     Spencer CA, Eigen A, Shen D, Duda M, Qualls S, Weiss S, Nicoloff JT 1987 Specificity of sensitive assays of thyrotropin (TSH) used to screen for thyroid disease in hospitalized patients. Clin Chem 33:1391-1396

152.     Ekins R 1987 Validity of analog free thyroxin immunoassays. Clin Chem 33:2137-2152

153.     Clarke W, Schiel JE, Moser A, Hage DS 2005 Analysis of free hormone fractions by an ultrafast immunoextraction/displacement immunoassay: studies using free thyroxine as a model system. Anal Chem 15:1859-1866

154.     Oppenheimer JH, Schwartz HL, Mariash CN, Kaiser FE 1982 Evidence for a factor in the sera of patients with nonthyroidal disease which inhibits iodothyronine binding by solid matrices, serum proteins, and rat hepatocytes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 54:757-766

155.     Midgley JE 2007 Spurious conclusions on analog free thyroxine assay performance. Clin Chem:1714

156.     Piketty ML, d’Herbomez M, Le Guillouzic D, Lebtahi R, Cosson E, Dumont A, Dilouya A, Helal BO 1996 Clinical comparison of three labeled-antibody immunoassays of free triiodothyronine. Clin Chem 42:933-941

157.     Kaptein EM, Macintyre SS, Weiner JM, Spencer CA 1981 Free thyroxine estimates in nonthyroidal illness: comparison of eight methods. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 52:1073-1077

158.     Bayer MF 1983 Free thyroxine results are affected by albumin concentration and nonthyroidal illness. Clin Chim Acta 130:391-396

159.     Liewendahl K, Tikanoja S, Helenius T, Valimaki M 1984 Discrepancies between serum free triiodothyronine and free thyroxin as measured by equilibrium dialysis and analog radioimmunoassay in nonthyroidal illnesses. Clin Chem 30:760-762

160.     Midgley JEM, Sheehan CP, Christofides ND, Fry JE, Browning D, Mandel R 1990 Concentrations of free thyroxin and albumin in serum in nonthyroidal illness : assay artefacts and physiological influences. Clin Chem 36:765-771

161.     Kurtz A, Dwyer K, Ekins R 1979 Serum free thyroxine in pregnancy. Br Med J ii:550-551

162.     Ekins R, Filetti S, Kurtz AB, Dwyer K 1980 A simple general method for the assay of free hormones(and drugs): its application to the measurement of serum free thyroxine levels and the bearing of assay results on the “free thyroxine” concept. J Endocrinol 85:29-30

163.     Witherspoon LR, Shuler SE, Garcia MM, Zollinger LA 1980 An assessment of methods for the estimation of free thyroxine. J Nucl Med 21:529-539

164.     Rajan MGR, Samuel AM 1987 A two-step radioimmunoassay for free triiodothyronine in serum. Clin Chem 33:372-376

165.     Slag MF, Morley JE, Elson MK, Labrosse KR, Crowson  TW, Nuttall FQ, et al 1981 Free thyroxine levels in critically ill patients. A comparison of currently available assays. JAMA 246:2702-2706

166.     Melmed S, Geola FL, Reed AW, Pekary AE, Park J, Hershman JM 1982 A Comparison of methods for assessing thyroid function in nonthyroidal illness. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 54:300-306

167.     Wilkins TA, Midgely JEM 1981 New methods of free thyroid hormone assay. In: Bizollon CA ed Physiological peptides and new trends in radioimmunology: Amsterdam: Elsevier Biomedical Press:215-234

168.     Midgley JEM, Moon CR, Wilkins TA 1987 Validity of analog free thyroxin immunoassays. Part II. Clin Chem 33:2145-2152

169.     Fritz KS, Wilcox RB, Nelson JC 2007 A direct free thyroxine (T4) immunoassay with the characteristics of a total T4 immunoassay. Clin Chem 53:911-915

170.     De Nayer P, Malvaux P, Beckers C 1984 Familial dysalbuminemic hyperthyroxinemia (FDH): inadequacy of the “analog” methods for assaying free T4 levels. Eur J Nucl Med 10:284-285

171.     Chopra IJ, Van Herle AJ, Chua Teco GN, Nguyen AH 1980 Serum free thyroxine in thyroidal and non-thyroidal illnesses: a comparison of measurements made by radioimmunoassay , equilibrium dialysis and free thyroxine index. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 51:135-143

172.     Stockigt JR 1996 Guidelines for diagnosis and monitoring of thyroid disease: nonthyroidal illness. Clin Chem 42:188-192

173.     Spencer CA 1986 Clinical evaluation of free T4 techniques. J Endocrinol Invest 9:57-66

174.     Arevalo G 1986 A reminder that hyperlipidemia interferes with determination of Thyrotropin. Clin Chem 32:907-908

175.     Jensen IW, Faber J 1988 Familial dysalbuminemic hyperthyroxinemia: a review. J Royal Soc Med 81:34-37

176.     Meinhold H, Wenzel KW 1985 Comparative methodological studies with six commercial FT4 kits. NucCompact 16:317-320

177.     Csako G, Zweig MH, Benson C, Ruddel M 1987 On the albumin-dependence of measurements of free thyroxin. II. Patients with non-thyroidal illness. Clin Chem 33:87-92

178.     Midgley JEM, Wilkins TA 1983 Effect of albumin concentration on equilibrium radioimmunoassay of serum free thyroxin with labeled thyroxin analog (“Amerlex Free T4”). Clin Chem 29:1861-1863

179.     Ekins R, Edwards P, Jackson T, Geiscler D 1984 Interpretation of labeled-analog free hormone assay. Clin Chem 30:491-493

180.     Alexander NM 1986 Free thyroxin in serum: labeled thyroxin-analog methods fall short of their mark (Editorial). Clin Chem 32:417

181.     Sheehan CP, Christofides ND 1992 One-step, labeled-antibody assay for measuring free thyroxin. !!. Performance in a multicenter trial. Clin Chem 38:19-25

182.     d’Herbomez M, Forzy G, Gasser F, Massart C, Beaudonnet A, Sapin R 2003 Clinical evaluation of nine free thyroxine assays: persistent problems in particular populations. Clin Chem Lab Med 41:942-947

183.     Sapin R, d’Herbomez M 2003 Free thyroxine measured by equilibrium dialysis and nine immunoassays in sera with various serum thyroxine-binding capacities. Clin Chem Lab Med 49:1531-1535

184.     Persani L, C A, P B-P 1994 Dissociation between immunological and buiological activities of circulating TSH. Exp Clin Endocrinol 102:38-48

185.     Persani L, Ferretti E, Borgato S, Faglia G, Beck-Peccoz P 2000 Circulating thyrotropin bioactivity in sporadic central hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:3631-3635

186.     Lania A, Persani L, Beck-Peccoz P 2008 Central hypothyroidism. Pituitary 11:181-186

187.     Haugen BR 2009 Drugs that suppress TSH or cause central hypothyroidism. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 23:793-800

188.     Roelfsema F, Kok S, Kok P, Pereira AM, Biermasz NR, Smit JW, Frolich M, Keenan DM, Veldhuis JD, Romijn JA 2009 Pituitary-hormone secretion by thyrotropinomas. Pituitary 12:200-210

189.     Meier CA, Maisey MN, Lowry A, Müller J, Smith MA 1993 Interindividual differences in the pituitary-thyroid axis influence the interpretation of thyroid function tests. CLIN Endocrinol (Oxf) 39:101-107

190.     Benhadi N, Fliers E, Visser TJ, Reitsma JB, Wiersinga WM 2010 Pilot study on the assessment of the setpoint of the hypothalamus-pituitary-thyroid axis in healthy volunteers. Eur J Endocrinol 162:323-329

191.     Tan MJ, Tan F, Hawkins R, Cheah WK, Mukherjee JJ 2006 A hyperthyroid patient with measurable thyroid-stimulating hormone concentration – a trap for the unwary. Ann Acad Med Singapore 35:500-503

192.     Ross HA MP, Thomas CM, Mudde AH, Kouwenberg M, Wolffenbuttel BH, 2008 Interference from heterophilic antibodies in seven current TSH assays. Ann Clin Biochem 45:616

193.     Verhoye E, Van den Bruel A, Delanghe JR, Debruyne E, Langlois MR 2009 Spuriously high thyrotropin values due to anti-thyrotropin antibodies in adult patients. Clin Chem Lab Med 47:604-606

194.     Drinka PJ, Nolten WE, Voeks S, Langer E, Carlson IH 1991 Misleading elevation of the free thyroxine index in nursing home residents. Arch Pathol Lab Med 115:1208-1211

195.    Becker DV, Bigos ST, Gaitan E, Morris JC, Rallison ML, Spencer CA, Sugawara M, Middlesworth LV, Wartofsky L 1993 Optimal use of blood tests for assessment of thyroid function. JAMA 269:2736

196.     Fisher DA, Nelson JC, Carlton EI, Wilcox RB 2000 Maturation of human hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid function and control. Thyroid 10:229-234

197.     van der Sluijs Veer G, Vermes I, Bonte HA, Hoorn RK 1992 Temperature effects on free-thyroxine measurements: analytical and clinical consequences. Clin Chem 38:1327-1331

198.     Soldin SJ, Cheng LL, Lam LY, Werner A, Le AD, Soldin OP 2010 Comparison of FT4 with log TSH on the Abbott Architect ci8200: Pediatric reference intervals for free thyroxine and thyroid-stimulating hormone. Clin Chim Acta 411:250-252

199.     Guven S, Alver A, Mentese A, Ilhan FC, Calapoglu M, Unsal MA 2009 The novel ischemia marker ‘ischemia-modified albumin’ is increased in normal pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88:479-482

200.     Berta E, Samson L, Lenkey A, Erdei A, Cseke B, Jenei K, Major T, Jakab A, Jenei Z, Paragh G, Nagy EV, Bodor M 2010 Evaluation of the thyroid function of healthy pregnant women by five different hormone assays. Pharmazie 65:436-439

201.     Anckaert E, Poppe K, Van Uytfanghe K, Schiettecatte J, Foulon W, Thienpont LM 2010 FT4 immunoassays may display a pattern during pregnancy similar to the equilibrium dialysis ID-LC/tandem MS candidate reference measurement procedure in spite of susceptibility towards binding protein alterations. Clin Chim Acta 411:1348-1353

202.     Bourcigaux N, Lepoutre-Lussey C, Guéchot J, Donadille B, Faugeron I, Ouzounian S, Christin-Maître S, Bouchard P, Duron F 2010 Thyroid function at the third trimester of pregnancy in a Northern French population. Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 71:519-524

203.     Glinoer D, de Nayer P, Bourdoux P, Lemone M, Robyn C, van Steirteghem A, Kinthaert J, Lejeune B 1990 Regulation of maternal thyroid during pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 71:276-287

204.     Panesar NS, Li CY, Rogers MS 2001 Reference intervals for thyroid hormones in pregnant Chinese women. Ann Clin Biochem 38:329-332

205.     Price A, Obel O, Cresswell J, Catch I, Rutter S, Barik S, Heller SR, Weetman AP 2001 Comparison of thyroid function in pregnant and non-pregnant Asian and western Caucasian women. Clin Chim Acta 308:91-98

206.     Dashe JS, Casey BM, Wells CE, McIntire DD, Byrd EW, Leveno KJ, Cunningham FG 2005 Thyroid-stimulating hormone in singleton and twin pregnancy: importance of gestational age-specific reference ranges. Obstet Gynecol 106:753-757

207.     McElduff A, Morris J 2008 Thyroid function tests and thyroid autoantibodies in an unselected population of women undergoing first trimester screening for aneuploidy. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol 48:478-480

208.     Gilbert RM, Hadlow NC, Walsh JP, Fletcher SJ, Brown SJ, Stuckey BG, Lim EM 2008 Assessment of thyroid function during pregnancy: first-trimester (weeks 9-13) reference intervals derived from Western Australian women. Med J Aust 189:250-253

209.     Cotzias C, Wong SJ, Taylor E, Seed P, Girling J 2008 A study to establish gestation-specific reference intervals for thyroid function tests in normal singleton pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 137:61-66

210.    Männistö T, Surcel HM, Ruokonen A, Vääräsmäki M, Pouta A, Bloigu A, Järvelin MR, Hartikainen AL, Suvanto E 2011 Early pregnancy reference intervals of thyroid hormone concentrations in a thyroid antibody-negative pregnant population. Thyroid 21:291-298

211.     Glinoer D, Riahi M, Grun JP, Kinthaert J 1994 Risk of subclinical hypothyroidism in pregnant women with asymptomatic autoimmune thyroid disorders. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:1970

212.     Pearce EN, Oken E, Gillman MW, Lee SL, Magnani B, Platek D, Braverman LE 2008 Association of first-trimester thyroid function test values with thyroperoxidase antibody status, smoking, and multivitamin use. Endocr Pract 14:33-39

213.     Lambert-Messerlian G, McClain M, Haddow JE, Palomaki GE, Canick JA, Cleary-Goldman J, Malone FD, Porter TF, Nyberg DA, Bernstein P, D’Alton ME 2008 First- and second-trimester thyroid hormone reference data in pregnant women: a FaSTER (First- and Second-Trimester Evaluation of Risk for aneuploidy) Research Consortium study. Am J Obstet Gyneol 199:62: e61-66

214.     Ashoor G, Kametas NA, Akolekar R, Guisado J, Nicolaides KH 2010 Maternal thyroid function at 11-13 weeks of gestation. Fetal Diagn Ther 27:156-163

215.     Soldin SJ, Kahric-Janicic N, Jonklaas J, Soldin OP 2011 Comments on the manuscript by Anckaert et al., Clin Chim Acta 2010;411:1348-53. Clin Chim Acta 412:483

216.     Antonangeli L, Maccherini D, Cavaliere R, Di Giulio C, Reinhardt B, Pinchera A, Aghini-Lombardi F 2002 Comparison of two different doses of iodide in the prevention of gestational goiter in marginal iodine deficiency: a longitudinal study. Eur J Endocrinol 147:29-34

217.     Dhatt GS, Jayasundaram R, Wareth LA, Nagelkerke N, Jayasundaram K, Darwish EA, Lewis A 2006 Thyrotrophin and free thyroxine trimester-specific reference intervals in a mixed ethnic pregnant population in the United Arab Emirates. Clin Chim Acta 370:147-151

218.     La’ulu SL, Roberts WL 2011 Ethnic differences in first-trimester thyroid reference intervals. Clin Chem 57:913-915

219.     Moleti M, Di Bella B, Giorgianni G, Mancuso A, De Vivo A, Alibrandi A, Trimarchi F, Vermiglio F 2011 Maternal thyroid function in different conditions of iodine nutrition in pregnant women exposed to mild-moderate iodine deficiency: an observational study. Clin Endocrinol 74:762-768

220.     Ball R, Freedman DB, Holmes JC, Midgley JE, Sheehan CP 1989 Low-normal concentrations of free thyroxin in serum in late pregnancy: physiological fact, not technical artefact. Clin Chem 35:1891-1896

221.     Kung AW, Lao TT, Chau MT, Tam SC, Low LC 2000 Goitrogenesis during pregnancy and neonatal hypothyroxinaemia in a borderline iodine sufficient area. Clin Endocrinol 53:725-731

222.     Pedersen KM, Laurberg P, Iversen E, Knudsen PR, Gregersen HE, Rasmussen OS, Larsen KR, Eriksen GM, Johannesen PL 1993 Amelioration of some pregnancy-associated variations in thyroid function by iodine supplementation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77:1078-1083

223.     Cameron SJ, Hagedorn JC, Sokoll LJ, Caturegli P, Ladenson PW 2005 Dysprealbuminemic hyperthyroxinemia in a patient with hyperthyroid graves disease. Clin Chem 51:1065-1069

224.     Refetoff S 2007 Defects of thyroid hormone transport in serum. Thyroid Managerorg:

225.     Giovanella L, Dorizzi RM, Keller F 2008 A hypothyroid patient with increased free thyroid hormones. Clin Chem Lab Med 46:1650-1651

226.     Sakata S, Matsuda M, Ogawa T, Takuno H, Matsui I, Sarui H, Yasuda K 1994 Prevalence of thyroid hormone autoantibodies in healthy subjects. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 41:365-370

227.     Benvenga S, Ordookhani A, Pearce EN, Tonacchera M, Azizi F, Braverman LE 2008 Detection of circulating autoantibodies against thyroid hormones in an infant with permanent congenital hypothyroidism and her twin with transient congenital hypothyroidism: possible contribution of thyroid hormone autoantibodies to neonatal and infant hypothyroidism. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 21:1011-1020

228.     Garber JR, Cobin RH, Gharib H, Hennessey JV, Klein I, Mechanick JI, Pessah-Pollack R, Singer PA, Woeber KA 2012 Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hypothyroidism in Adults: Co-sponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American Thyroid Association. Endocr Pract 18:1-207

229.     Cobb WE, Lamberton RP, Jackson IMD 1984 Use of a rapid, sensitive immunoradiometric assay for Thyrotropin to distinguish normal from hyperthyroid subjects. Clin Chem 30:1558-1560

230.     Piketty ML, Talbot JN, Askienazy S, Milhaud G 1987 Clinical significance of a low concentration of Thyrotropin” five immunometric “kit” assays compared. Clin Chem 33:1237-1241

231.    Evans MC 1988 Ten commercial kits compared for assay of Thyrotropin in the normal and thyrotoxic range. Clin Chem 34:123-127

232.     Yalow RS, Berson SA 1960 Immunoassay of endogenous plasma insulin in man. J Clin Invest 39:1157-1175

233.     Utiger RD 1965 Radioimmunoassay of human plasma thyrotropin. J Clin Invest 44:1277-1286

234.     Odell WD, Wilber JF, Paul WE 1965 Radioimmunoassay of thyrotropin in human serum. J Clin Endocrinol 25:1179-1188

235.    Patel YC, Burger HG, Hudson B 1971 Radioimmunoassay of serum thyrotropin: Sensitivity and Specificity. J Clin Endocrinol 33:768-774

236.     Hall R, Amos J, Ormston BJ 1971 Radioimmunoassay of human serum thyrotropin. Br Med J 1:582-?

237.     Hershman JM 1971 Utility of the radioimmunoassay of serum thyrotropin in man. Ann Intern Med 74:481-490

238.     Gordin A, Saarinen P 1972 Methodological study of the radioimmunoassay of human thyrotropin. Acta Endocrinol 71:24-36

239.     Moser RJ, Hollingsworth DR 1975 Examination of some factors affecting sensitivity and reproducibility in radioimmunoassay of Thyrotropin. Clin Chem 21:347-352

240.     Smith SR, Burton DW, Izenstark JL 1979 Levels of serum Thyroid-stimulating Hormone in hyperthyroidism. Arch Intern Med 139:757-760

241.     Spencer CA, Nicoloff JT 1980 Improved radioimmunoassay for human TSH. Clin Chim Acta 108:415-424

242.     Mori T, Imura H, Bito S, Ikekubo K, Inoue S, Hashida S, Ishikawa E, Ogawa H 1987 Clinical usefulness of a highly sensitive enzyme-immunoassay  of TSH. Clin Endocrinol 27:1-10

243.     Wehmann RE, Rubenstein BA, Nisula BC 1979 A sensitive, convenient radioimmunoassay procedure which demonstrates that serum hTSH is suppressed below the normal range in thyrotoxic patients. Endocrine Res Commun 6:249-255

244.     Haigler ED, Pittman JA, Hershman JM, Baugh CM 1971 Direct evaluation of pituitary Thyrotropin reserve utilizing synthetic Thyrotropin Releasing Hormone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 33:573-581

245.     Hall R, Ormston BJ, Besser GM, Cryer RJ, McKendrick M 1972 The thyrotropin-releasing hormone test in diseases of the pituitary and hypothalamus. Lancet i:759-763

246.     Evans M, Croxson MS, Wilson TM, Ibbertson HK 1985 The screening of patients with suspected thyrotoxicosis using a sensitive TSH radioimmunoassay. Clin Endocrinol 22:445-451

247.     Spencer CA, Schwarzbein D, Guttler RB, LoPresti JS, Nicoloff JT 1993 TRH stimulation test responses employing third and fourth generation TSH assays. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 76:494-498

248.     Atmaca H, Tanriverdi F, Gokce C, Unluhizarci K, Kelestimur F 2007 Do we still need the TRH stimulation test? Thyroid 17:529-533

249.     Duntas LH, Emerson CH 2009 On the Fortieth Anniversary of Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone: The Hormone that Launched a New Era. Thyroid 19:1299-1301

250.     Seth J, Kellett HA, Caldwell G, Sweeting VM, Beckett GJ, Gow SM, Toft AD 1984 A sensitive immunoradiometric assay for serum thyroid stimulating hormone: a replacement for the thyrotropin releasing test. Br Med J 289:1334-1336

251.     Miles LEM, Hales CN 1968 Labeled antibodies and immunological assay systems. Nature 219:186-189

252.     Kohler G, Milstein C 1975 Continuous culture of fused cells secreting specific antibody of predefined specificity. Nature 256:495-497

253.     Winter G, Milstein C 1991 Man-made antibodies. Nature 349:293-299

254.     Kemp HA, John R, Woodhead SJ 1982 Labeled antibody Immunoassays. Ligand Quarterly 5:27-34

255.     Rattle SJ, Purnell DR, Williams PI, Siddle K, Forrest GC 1984 New separation method for monoclonal immunoradiometric assays and its application to assays for thyrotropin and human choriogonadotropin. Clin Chem 30:1457-1461

256.     McConway MG, Biggart EM, Chapman RS 1987 Performance of the two-site immunoradiometric assay for serum thyroid-stimulating hormone. Effects of changes in solid-phase matrix and antibody coupling chemistry. J Immunolog Methods 104:87-92

257.     Odell WD, Griffin J, Zahradnik R 1986 Two monoclonal -antibody sandwich-type assay for thyrotropin, with use of an avidin-biotin separation technique. Clin Chem 32:1873-1878

258.     Wilkins TA, Brouwers G, Mareschal JC, Cambiasco CL 1988 High sensitivity, homogeneous particle-based immunoassay for thyrotropin (Multipact TM). Clin Chem 34:1749-1752

259.     Athey D, Ball M, McNeil CJ 1993 Avidin-biotin based electrochemical immunoassay for Thyrotropin. Ann Clin Biochem 30:570-577

260.     McCapra F, Watmore D, Sumun F, Patel A, Beheshti I, Ramakrishnan K, Branson J 1989 Luminescent labels for immunoassay-from concept to practice. J Biolum Chimilum 4:51-58

261.     Fiore M, Mitchell J, Doan T, al e 1988 The Abbott IMx automated benchtop immunochemistry analyzer system. Clin Chem 34:1726-1732

262.     McBride JH, Rodgerson Do, Allin RE 1987 Choriogonadotrophin interference in a sensitive assay for Thyrotropin. Clin Chem 33:1303-1304

263.     Taimela E, Tahtela R, Koskinen P, Nuutila P, Forsstrom J, Taimela S, Karonen SL, Valimaki M, Irjala K 1994 Ability of two new thyrotropin (TSH) assays to separate hyperthyroid patients from euthyroid patients with low TSH. Clin Chem 40:101-105

264.     Spencer CA, Takeuchi M, Kazarosyn M, MacKenzie F, Beckett GJ, Wilkinson E 1995 Interlaboratory/intermethod differences in functional sensitivity  of immunometric assays for thyrotropin (TSH): impact on reliability of measurement of subnormal concentration. Clin Chem 41:367-374

265.     Vogeser M, Weigand M, Fraunberger P, Fischer H, Cremer P 2000 Evaluation of the ADVIA Centaur TSH-3 assay. Clin Chem Lab Med 38:331-334

266.     Hendriks HA, Kortlandt W, Verweij WM 2000 Standardized comparison of processing capacity and efficiency of five new-generation immunoassay analyzers. Clin Chem 46:105-111

267.     Bernutz C, Horn K, Konig A, Pickardt CR 1985 Advantages of sensitive assays for Thyrotropin in the diagnosis of thyroid disorders. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 23:851-856

268.     Wiersinga WM, Endert E, Trip MD, Verhaest-de Jong N 1986 Immunoradiometric assay of Thyrotropin in plasma: its value in predicting response to thyroliberin stimulation and assessing thyroid function in amiodarone-treated patients. Clin Chem 32:433-436

269.     Bassett F, Eastman CJ, Ma G, Maberly GF, Smith HC 1986 Diagnostic value of Thyrotropin concentrations in serum as measured by a sensitive immunoradiometric assay. Clin Chem 32:461-464

270.     Martino E, Bambini G, Bartalena L, Mammoli C, Aghini-Lombardi F, Baschieri L, Pinchera A 1986 Human serum thyrotropin measurement by ultrasensitive immunoradiometric assay as a first-line test in the evaluation of thyroid function. Clin Endocrinol 24:141-148

271.     Thornes HM, McLeod DT, Carr D 1987 Economy and efficiency in routine thyroid-function testing: use of a sensitive immunoradiometric assay for thyrotropin in a General Hospital Laboratory. Clin Chem 33:1636-1638

272.     Klee GG, Hay ID 1987 Assessment of sensitive Thyrotropin assays for an expanded role in thyroid function testing: proposed criteria for analytic performance and clinical utility. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 64:461-471

273.     Kasagi K, Kousaka T, Misaki T, Iwata M, Alam MS, Konishi J 1999 Comparison of serum thyrotrophin concentrations determined by a third generation assay in patients with various types of overt and subclinical thyrotoxicosis. Clin Endocrinol 50:185-189

274.     Ross DS, Daniels GH, Gouveia D 1990 The use and limitations of a chemiluminescent thyrotropin assay as a single thyroid function test in an out-patient endocrine clinic. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 71:764-769

275.     Hay ID, Bayer MF, Kaplan MM, Klee GG, Larsen PR, Spencer CA 1991 American Thyroid Association Assessment of Current Free Thyroid Hormone and Thyrotropin Measurements and Guidelines for Future Clinical Assays. Clin Chem 37:2002 – 2008

276.     Fraser CG, Browning MCK 1986 A plea for abandonment of the term “Highly Sensitive” for Thyrotropin assays. Clin Chem 32:569-570

277.     Caldwell G, Gow SM, Sweeting VM, Beckett GJ, Seth J, Toft AD 1987 Value and limitations of a highly sensitive immunoradioimetric assay for Thyrotropin in the study of thyrotroph function. Clin Chem 33:303-305

278.     Hildebrandt L, White GH 1988 Is a “Super-Sensitive” thyrotropin assay (“Magic Lite”) of more diagnostic value? Clin Chem 34:2584-2585

279.     Surmont DWA, Alexandre JA 1988 Adaptations to keep a Thyrotropin immunoradiometric assay “supersensitive” with automated pipetting. Clin Chem 34:370-371

280.     Gaines-Das RE, Brettschneider H, Bristow AF 1991 International Federation of Clinical Chemistry. The effects of common matrices for assay standards on the performance of “ultra sensitive” immunometric assays for TSH. Clin Chim Acta 203:S5-16

281.     Sadler WA, Murray LM, Turner JG 1996 What does “functional sensitivity” mean? Clin Chem 42:2051

282.     Reix N, Massart C, Gasser F, Heurtault B, Agin A 2012 Should functional sensitivity of a new thyroid stimulating hormone immunoassay be monitored routinely? The ADVIA Centaur TSH3-UL assay experience. Clin Biochem 45:1260-1262

283.     Rawlins ML, Roberts WL 2004 Performance characteristics of six third-generation assays for thyroid-stimulating hormone. Clin Chem 50:2338-2344

284.     Owen WE, Gantzer ML, Lyons JM, Rockwood AL, Roberts WL 2011 Functional sensitivity of seven automated thyroid stimulating hormone immunoassays. Clin Chim Acta 412:2336-2339

285.     Meikle AW, Stringham JD, Woodward MG, Nelson JC 1988 Hereditary and environmental influences on the variation of thyroid hormones in normal male twins. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 66:588-592

286.     Bjoro T, Holmen J, Kruger O, Midthjell K, Hunstad K, Schreiner T, Sandnes L, Brochmann H 2000 Prevalence of thyroid disease, thyroid dysfunction and thyroid peroxidase antibodies in a large, unselected population. The Health Study of Nord-Trondelag (HUNT). Eur J Endocrinol 143:639-647

287.     Jensen E, Hyltoft Petersen P, Blaabjerg O, Hansen PS, Brix TH, Kyvik KO, Hegedus L 2004 Establishment of a serum thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) reference interval in healthy adults. The importance of environmental factors, including thyroid antibodies. Clin Chem Lab Med 42:824-832

288.     Stricker R, Echenard M, Eberhart R, Chevailler MC, Perez V, Quinn FA, Stricker R 2007 Evaluation of maternal thyroid function during pregnancy: the importance of using gestational age-specific reference intervals. Eur J Endocrinol 157:509-514

289.     Hollowell JG, Staehling NW, Hannon WH, Flanders WD, Gunter EW, Spencer CA, Braverman LE 2002 Serum thyrotropin, thyroxine, and thyroid antibodies in the United States population (1988 to 1994): NHANES III. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:489-499

290.     d’Herbomez M, Jarrige V, Darte C 2005 Reference intervals for serum thyrotropin (TSH) and free thyroxine (FT4) in adults using the Access Immunoassay System. Clin Chem Lab Med 43:102-105

291.     Zarković M, Cirić J, Beleslin B, Cirić S, Bulat P, Topalov D, Trbojević B 2011 Further studies on delineating thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) reference range. Horm Metab Res 43:970-976

292.     Goichot B, Sapin R, Schlienger JL 2009 Subclinical hyperthyroidism: considerations in defining the lower limit of the thyrotropin reference interval. Clin Chem 55:420-424

293.     Hamilton TE, Davis S, Onstad L, Kopecky KJ 2008 Thyrotropin levels in a population with no clinical, autoantibody, or ultrasonographic evidence of thyroid disease: implications for the diagnosis of subclinical hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:1224-1230

294.     O’Leary PC, Feddema PH, Michelangeli VP, Leedman PJ, Chew GT, Knuiman M, Kaye J, Walsh JP 2006 Investigations of thyroid hormones and antibodies based on a community health survey: the Busselton thyroid study. Clin Endocrinol 64:97-104

295.     Volzke H, Alte D, Kohlmann T, Ludemann J, Nauck M, John U, Meng W 2005 Reference intervals of serum thyroid function tests in a previously iodine-deficient area. Thyroid 15:279-285

296.     Kratzsch J, Fiedler GM, Leichtle A, Brugel M, Buchbinder S, Otto L, Sabri O, Matthes G, Thiery J 2005 New reference intervals for thyrotropin and thyroid hormones based on national academy of clinical biochemistry criteria and regular ultrasonography of the thyroid. Clin Chem 51:1480-1486

297.     Völzke H, Schmidt CO, John U, Wallaschofski H, Dörr M, Nauck M 2010 Reference levels for serum thyroid function tests of diagnostic and prognostic significance. Horm Metab Res 42:809-814

298.     Wartofsky L, Dickey RA 2005 The evidence for a narrower thyrotropin reference range is compelling. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:5483-5488

299.     Surks MI, Hollowell JG 2007 Age-specific distribution of serum thyrotropin and antithyroid antibodies in the US population: implications for the prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:4575-4582

300.     Surks MI 2008 Should the upper limit of the normal reference range for TSH be lowered? Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 4:370-371

301.     Laurberg P, Andersen S, Carlé A, Karmisholt J, Knudsen N, Pedersen IB 2011 The TSH upper reference limit: where are we at? Nat Rev Endocrinol 7:232-239

302.     Atzmon G, Barzilai N, Hollowell JG, Surks MI, Gabriely I 2009 Extreme longevity is associated with increased serum thyrotropin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:1251-1254

303.     Sichieri R, Baima J, Marante T, de Vasconcellos MT, Moura AS, Vaisman M 2007 Low prevalence of hypothyroidism among black and Mulatto people in a population-based study of Brazilian women. Clin Endocrinol 66:803-807

304.     Boucai L SM 2009 Reference limits of serum TSH and free T4 are significantly influenced by race and age in an urban outpatient medical practice. Clin Endocrinol 70:788-793

305.     Vejbjerg P, Knudsen N, Perrild H, Carlé A, Laurberg P, Pedersen IB, Rasmussen LB, Ovesen L, Jørgensen T 2008 The impact of smoking on thyroid volume and function in relation to a shift towards iodine sufficiency. Eur J Epidemiol 23:423-429

306.     Buchinger W, Lorenz-Wawschinek O, Semlitsch G, Langsteger W, Binter G, Bonelli RM, Eber O 1997 Thyrotropin and thyroglobulin as an index of optimal iodine intake: correlation with iodine excretion of 39,913 euthyroid patients. Thyroid 7:593-597

307.     Nyrnes A, Jorde R, Sundsfjord J 2006 Serum TSH is positively associated with BM. Int J Obes 30:100-105

308.     Knudsen N, Laurberg P, Rasmussen LB, Bulow I, Perrild H, Ovesen L, Jorgensen T 2005 Small differences in thyroid function may be important for body mass index and the occurrence of obesity in the population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:4019-4024

309.     Kok P, Roelfsema F, Langendonk JG, Frolich M, Burggraaf J, Meinders AE, Pijl H 2005 High circulating thyrotropin levels in obese women are reduced after body weight loss induced by caloric restriction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:4659-4663

310.     Chikunguwo S, Brethauer S, Nirujogi V, Pitt T, Udomsawaengsup S, Chand B, Schauer P 2007 Influence of obesity and surgical weight loss on thyroid hormone levels. Surg Obes Relat Dis 3:631-635

311.     Fox CS, Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB, Murabito JM, Seely EW, Pearce EN, Vasan RS 2008 Relations of thyroid function to body weight: cross-sectional and longitudinal observations in a community-based sample. Arch Intern Med 168:587-592

312.     Friedrich N, Rosskopf D, Brabant G, Völzke H, Nauck M, Wallaschofski H 2010 Associations of anthropometric parameters with serum TSH, prolactin, IGF-I, and testosterone levels: results of the study of health in Pomerania (SHIP). Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 118:266-273

313.     Asvold BO, Vatten LJ, Nilsen TI, Bjoro T 2007 The association between TSH within the reference range and serum lipid concentrations in a population-based study. The HUNT Study. Eur J Endocrinol 156:181-186

314.     Soldin OP, Goughenour BE, Gilbert SZ, Landy HJ, Soldin SJ 2010 Thyroid Hormone Levels Associated with Active and Passive Cigarette Smoking. Thyroid 20:0-0

315.     Surks MI, Boucai L 2010 Age- and race-based serum Thyrotropin Reference Limits. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95:496 -502

316.     Bremner AP, Feddema P, Leedman PJ, Brown SJ, Beilby JP, Lim EM, Wilson SG, O’Leary PC, Walsh JP 2012 Age-related changes in thyroid function: a longitudinal study of a community-based cohort. J Cln Endocrinol Metab 97:1554-1562

317.     Spencer CA, Hollowell JG, Kazarosyan M, Braverman LE 2007 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH)-thyroperoxidase antibody relationships demonstrate that TSH upper reference limits may be skewed by occult thyroid dysfunction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:4236-4240

318.     Zelaya AS, Stotts A, Nader S, Moreno CA 2010 Antithyroid peroxidase antibodies in patients with high normal range thyroid stimulating hormone. Fam Med 42:111-115

319.     Mariotti S 2005 Thyroid function and aging: do serum 3,5,3′-triiodothyronine and thyroid-stimulating hormone concentrations give the Janus response. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:6735-6737

320.     Gussekloo J, van Exel E, de Craen AJ, Meinders AE, Frölich M, Westendorp RG 2004 Thyroid status, disability and cognitive function, and survival in old age. JAMA 292:2591-2599

321.     Atzmon G, Barzilai N, Surks MI, Gabriely I 2009 Genetic predisposition to elevated serum thyrotropin is associated with exceptional longevity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:4768-4775

322.     Simonsick EM, Newman AB, Ferrucci L, Satterfield S, Harris TB, Rodondi N, Bauer DC 2009 Subclinical hypothyroidism and functional mobility in older adults. Arch Intern Med 169:2011-2017

323.     Sgarbi J, Matsumura L, Kasamatsu T, Ferreira S, Maciel R 2010 Subclinical thyroid dysfunctions are independent risk factors for mortality in a 7.5 year follow-up: the Japanese-Brazilian thyroid study. Eur J Endocrinol Dec 4. [Epub ahead of print

324.     Rozing MP, Houwing-Duistermaat JJ, Slagboom PE, Beekman M, Frölich M, de Craen AJ, Westendorp RG, van Heemst D 2010 Familial longevity is associated with decreased thyroid function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95:4979-4984

325.     Kahapola-Arachchige KM, Hadlow N, Wardrop R, Lim EM, Walsh JP 2012 Age-specific TSH reference ranges have minimal impact on the diagnosis of thyroid dysfunction. CLIN Endocrinol (Oxf) 77:773-779

326.     Somwaru LL, Rariy CM, Arnold AM, Cappola AR 2012 The natural history of subclinical hypothyroidism in the elderly: the cardiovascular health study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:1962-1969

327.     Taylor PN, Panicker V, Sayers A, Shields B, Iqbal A, Bremner AP, Beilby JP, Leedman PJ, Hattersley AT, Vaidya B, Frayling T, Evans J, Tobias JH, Timpson NJ, Walsh JP, Dayan CM 2011 A meta-analysis of the associations between common variation in the PDE8B gene and thyroid hormone parameters, including assessment of longitudinal stability of associations over time and effect of thyroid hormone replacement. Eur J Endocrinol 164:773-780

328.     Louwerens M, Appelhof BC, Verloop H, Medici M, Peeters RP, Visser TJ, Boelen A, Fliers E, Smit JW, Dekkers OM 2012 Fatigue and fatigue-related symptoms in patients treated for different causes of hypothyroidism. Eur J Endocrinol 167:809-815

329.     Takeda K, Mishiba M, Sugiura H, Nakajima A, Kohama M, Hiramatsu S 2009 Evaluated reference intervals for serum free thyroxine and thyrotropin using the conventional outliner rejection test without regard to presence of thyroid antibodies and prevalence of thyroid dysfunction in Japanese subjects. Endoc J 56:1059-1066

330.     Mariotti S, Barbesino G, Caturegli P, Bartalena L, Sansoni P, Fagnoni F, Monti D, Fagiolo U, Franceschi C, Pinchera A 1993 Complex alteration of thyroid function in healthy centenarians. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77:1130-1134

331.     Hoogendoorn EH, Hermus AR, de Vegt F, Ross HA, Verbeek AL, Kiemeney LA, Swinkels DW, Sweep FC, den Heijer M 2006 Thyroid function and prevalence of anti-thyroperoxidase antibodies in a population with borderline sufficient iodine intake: influences of age and sex. Clin Chem 52:104-111

332.     Berghout A, Wiersinga WM, Smits NJ, touber JL 1990 Interrelationships between age, thyroid volume, thyroid nodularity, and thyroid function in patients with sporadic nontoxic goiter. Amer J Med 89:602-608

333.     Pedersen OM, Aardal NP, Larssen TB, Varhaug JE, Myking O, Vik-Mo H 2000 The value of ultrasonography in predicting autoimmune thyroid disease. Thyroid 10:251-259

334.     Silvio R, Swapp KJ, La’ulu SL, Hansen-Suchy K, Roberts WL 2009 Method specific second-trimester reference intervals for thyroid-stimulating hormone and free thyroxine. Clin Biochem 42:750-753

335.     Emerson CH 2009 Circulating thyroid stimulating hormones: why, when, and what to measure. Thyroid 19:1-3

336.     Sergi I, Papandreou MJ, Medri G, Canonne C, Verrier B, Ronin C 1991 Immunoreactive and bioactive isoforms of human thyrotropin. Endocrinology 128:3259-3268

337.     Szkudlinski MW, Fremont V, Ronin C, Weintraub BD 2002 Thyroid-stimulating hormone and thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor structure-function relationships. Physiol Rev 82:473-502

338.     van Coevorden A, Laurent E, Decoster C, Kerkhofs M, Neve P, van Cauter E, Mockel J 1989 Decreased basal and stimulated thyrotropin secretion in healthy elderly men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 69:177-185

339.     Barreca T, Franceschini R, Messina V, Bottaro L, Rolandi E 1985 24-hour thyroid-stimulating hormone secretory pattern in elderly men. Gerentology 31:119-123

340.     Glinoer D, Spencer CA 2010 Serum TSH determinations in pregnancy: how, when and why? Nat Rev Endocrinol 6:526-529

341.     Chan MK, Seiden-Long I, Aytekin M, Quinn F, Ravalico T, Ambruster D, Adeli K 2009 Canadian Laboratory Initiative on Pediatric Reference Interval Database (CALIPER): pediatric reference intervals for an integrated clinical chemistry and immunoassay analyzer, Abbott ARCHITECT ci8200. Clin Biochem 42:885-891

342.     Zurakowski D, Di Canzio J, Majzoub JA 1999 Pediatric reference intervals for serum thyroxine, triiodothyronine, thyrotropin and free thyroxine. Clin Chem 45:1087-1091

343.     Kapelari K, Kirchlechner C, Högler W, Schweitzer K, Virgolini I, Moncayo R 2008 Pediatric reference intervals for thyroid hormone levels from birth to adulthood: a retrospective study. BMC Endocr Disord 8:15

344.     Lazar L, Frumkin RB, Battat E, Lebenthal Y, Phillip M, Meyerovitch J 2009 Natural history of thyroid function tests over 5 years in a large pediatric cohort. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:1678-1682

345.     Verburg FA, Kirchgässner C, Hebestreit H, Steigerwald U, Lentjes EG, Ergezinger K, Grelle I, Reiners C, Luster M 2011 Reference ranges for analytes of thyroid function in children. Horm Metab Res 43:422-426

346.     Strich D, Edri S, Gillis D 2012 Current normal values for TSH and FT3 in children are too low: evidence from over 11,000 samples. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 25:245-248

347.     Andersen S, Pedersen KM, Bruun NH, Laurberg P 2002 Narrow individual variations in serum T(4) and T(3) in normal subjects: a clue to the understanding of subclinical thyroid disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:1068-1072

348.    Boas M, Forman JL, Juul A, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Skakkebaek NE, Hilsted L, Chellakooty M, Larsen T, Larsen JF, Petersen JH, Main KM 2009 Narrow intra-individual variation of maternal thyroid function in pregnancy based on a longitudinal study on 132 women. Eur J Endocrinol 161:903-910

349.     Panicker V, Wilson SG, Spector TD, Brown SJ, Falchi M, Richards JB, Surdulescu GL, Lim EM, Fletcher SJ, Walsh JP 2008 Heritability of serum TSH, free T4 and free T3 concentrations: a study of a large UK twin cohort. Clin Endocrinol 68:652-659

350.     Nilsson SE, Read S, Berg S, Johansson B 2009 Heritabilities for fifteen routine biochemical values: findings in 215 Swedish twin pairs 82 years of age or older. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 69:562-569

351.     Hansen PS, Brix TH, Sørensen TI, Kyvik KO, Hegedüs L 2004 Major genetic influence on the regulation of the pituitary-thyroid axis: a study of healthy Danish twins. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:1181-1187

352.     Peeters RP, van der Deure WM, Visser TJ 2006 Genetic variation in thyroid hormone pathway genes; polymorphisms in the TSH receptor and the iodothyronine deiodinases. Eur J Endocrinol 155:655-662

353.     Arnaud-Lopez L, Usala G, Ceresini G, Mitchell BD, Pilia MG, Piras MG, Sestu N, Maschio A, Busonero F, Albai G, Dei M, Lai S, Mulas A, Crisponi L, Tanaka T, Bandinelli S, Guralnik JM, Loi A, Balaci L, Sole G, Prinzis A, Mariotti S, Shuldiner AR, Cao A, Schlessinger D, Uda M, Abecasis GR, Nagaraja R, Sanna S, Naitza S 2008 Phosphodiesterase 8B gene variants are associated with serum TSH levels and thyroid function. Am J Hum Genet 82:1270-1280

354.     Shields BM, Freathy RM, Knight BA, Hill A, Weedon MN, Frayling TM, Hattersley AT, Vaidya B 2009 Phosphodiesterase 8B gene polymorphism is associated with subclinical hypothyroidism in pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:4608-4612

355.     Rapa A, Monzani A, Moia S, Vivenza D, Bellone S, Petri A, Teofoli F, Cassio A, Cesaretti G, Corrias A, de Sanctis V, Di Maio S, Volta C, Wasniewska M, Tatò L, Bona G 2009 Subclinical hypothyroidism in children and adolescents: a wide range of clinical, biochemical, and genetic factors involved. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:2414-2420

356.     De Marco G, Agretti P, Camilot M, Teofoli F, Tatò L, Vitti P, Pinchera A, Tonacchera M 2009 Functional studies of new TSH receptor (TSHr) mutations identified in patients affected by hypothyroidism or isolated hyperthyrotrophinaemia. Clin Endocrinol 70:335-338

357.     Brouwer JP, Appelhof BC, Peeters RP, Hoogendijk WJ, Huyser J, Schene AH, Tijssen JG, Van Dyck R, Visser TJ, Wiersinga WM, Fliers E 2006 Thyrotropin, but not a polymorphism in type II deiodinase, predicts response to paroxetine in major depression. Eur J Endocrinol 154:819-825

358.     Alberti L, Proverbio MC, Costagliola S, Romoli R, Boldrighini B, Vigone MC, Weber G, Chiumello G, Beck-Peccoz P, Persani L 2002 Germline mutations of TSH receptor gene as cause of nonautoimmune subclinical hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:2549-2555

359.     Andersen S, Bruun NH, Pedersen KM, Laurberg P 2003 Biologic variation is important for interpretation of thyroid function tests. Thyroid 13:1069-1078

360.     Jensen E, Petersen PH, Blaabjerg O, Hegedüs L 2007 Biological variation of thyroid autoantibodies and thyroglobulin. Clin Chem Lab Med 45:1058-1064

361.     Ankrah-Tetteh T, Wijeratne S, Swaminathan R 2008 Intraindividual variation in serum thyroid hormones, parathyroid hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1. Ann Clin Biochem 45:167-169

362.    van de Ven AC, Netea-Maier RT, Medici M, Sweep FC, Ross HA, Hofman A, de Graaf J, Kiemeney LA, Hermus AR, Peeters RP, Visser TJ, den Heijer M 2011 Underestimation of effect of thyroid function parameters on morbidity and mortality due to intra-individual variation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:E2014-2017

363.     Biondi B, Cooper DS 2008 The clinical significance of subclinical thyroid dysfunction. Endocr Rev 29:76-131

364.     Cooper DS, Biondi B 2012 Subclinical thyroid disease. Lancet 379:1142-1154

365.     Weeke J, Gundersen HJ 1978 Circadian and 30 minute variations in serum TSH and thyroid hormones in normal subjects. Acta Endocrinol 89:659-672

366.     Evans PJ, Weeks I, Jones MK, Woodhead JS, Scanlon MF 1986 The circadian variation of thyrotrophin in patients with primary thyroidal disease. CLIN Endocrinol (Oxf) 24:343-348

367.     Brabant G, Prank K, Hoang-Vu C, von zur Muhlen A 1991 Hypothalamic regulation of pulsatile thyrotropin secretion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 72:145-150

368.     Roelfsema F, Pereira AM, Veldhuis JD, Adriaanse R, Endert E, Fliers E, Romijn JA 2009 Thyrotropin secretion profiles are not different in men and women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:3964-3967

369.     Carr D, McLeod DT, Parry G, Thornes HM 1988 Fine adjustment of thyroxine replacement dosage: comparison of the thyrotrophin releasing hormone test using a sensitive thyrotrophin assay with measurement of free thyroid hormones and clinical assessment. Clin Endocrinol 28:325-333

370.     Walsh JP, Ward LC, Burke V, Bhagat CI, Shiels L, Henley D, Gillett MJ, Gilbert R, Tanner M, Stuckey BG 2006 Small changes in thyroxine dosage do not produce measurable changes in hypothyroid symptoms, well-being, or quality of life: results of a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:2624-2630

371.     Bach-Huynh TG, Nayak B, Loh J, Soldin S, Jonklaas J 2009 Timing of levothyroxine administration affects serum thyrotropin concentration. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:3905-3912

372.     Singer PA, Cooper DS, Levy EG, Ladenson PW, Braverman LE, Daniels G, Greenspan FS, McDougall IR, Nikolai TF 1995 Treatment guidelines for patients with hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism. Standards of Care Committee, American Thyroid Association. JAMA 273:808-812

373.     Ladenson PW, Singer PA, Ain KB, Bagchi N, Bigos ST, Levy EG, Smith SA, Daniels GH, Cohen HD 2000 American Thyroid Association guidelines for detection of thyroid dysfunction. Arch Intern Med 160:1573-1575

374.    Canaris GJ, Manowitz NR, Mayor G, Ridgway EC 2000 The Colorado Thyroid Disease Prevalence Study. Arch Intern Med 160:19-27

375.     Sawin CT 2002 Subclinical hyperthyroidism and atrial fibrillation. Thyroid 12:501-503

376.     Choi AR, Manning P 2009 Overshooting the mark: subclinical hyperthyroidism secondary to excess thyroid hormone treatment may be more prevalent than we realise. NZ Med J 122:93-94

377.     Jonklaas J, Sarlis NJ, Litofsky D, Ain KB, Bigos ST, Brierley JD, Cooper DS, Haugen BR, Ladenson PW, Magner J, Robbins J, Ross DS, Skarulis M, Maxon HR, Sherman SI 2006 Outcomes of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma following initial therapy. Thyroid

378.     Pujol P, Daures JP, Nsakala N, Baldet L, Bringer J, Jaffiol C 1996 Degree of thyrotropin suppression as a prognostic determinant in differentiated thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:4318-4323

379.     Persani L, Asteria C, Tonacchera M, Vitti P, Krishna V, Chatterjee K, Beck-Peccoz P 1994 Evidence for the secretion of thyrotropin with enhanced bioactivity in syndromes of thyroid hormone resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 78:1034-1039

380.     Beck-Peccoz P, Lania A, Beckers A, Chatterjee K, Wemeau J-L 2013 2013 European Thyroid Association Guidelines for the Diagnosis and treatment of TSH-secreting pituitary tumors. in press

381.     Lamb EJ, Martin J 2000 Thyroid function tests: often justified in the acutely ill. Ann Clin Biochem 37:158-164

382.     Mebis L, van den Berghe G 2009 The hypothalamus-pituitary-thyroid axis in critical illness. Neth J Med 67:332-340

383.     Mebis L, Paletta D, Debaveye Y, Ellger B, Langouche L, D’Hoore A, Darras VM, Visser TJ, Van den Berghe G 2009 Expression of thyroid hormone transporters during critical illness. Eur J Endocrinol 161:243-250

384.     Saravanan P, Dayan CM 2001 Thyroid autoantibodies. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am 30:315-337

385.     Schardt CW, McLaughlan SM, Matheson J, Smith BR 1982 An enzyme-linked immunoassay for thyroid microsomal antibodies. J Immunol Methods 55:155-168

386.     Mariotti S, Caturegli P, Piccolo P, Barbesino G, Pinchera A 1990 Antithyroid peroxidase autoantibodies in thyroid diseases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 71:661-669

387.     Tozzoli R, Bagnasco M, Giavarina D, Bizzaro N 2012 TSH receptor autoantibody immunoassay in patients with Graves’ disease: Improvement of diagnostic accuracy over different generations of methods. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Autoimmun Rev 12:107-113

388.     Massart C, Sapin R, Gibassier J, Agin A, d’Herbomez M 2009 Intermethod variability in TSH-receptor antibody measurement: implication for the diagnosis of Graves disease and for the follow-up of Graves ophthalmopathy. Clin Chem 55:183-186

389.     Rapoport B, Chazenbalk GD, Jaume JC, McLachlan SM 1998 The thyrotropin (TSH) receptor: interaction with TSH and autoantibodies. Endoc Rev 19:673-616

390.     Davies T, Marians R, Latif R 2002 The TSH receptor reveals itself. J Clin Invest 110:161-164

391.     Smith BR, McLachlan SM, Furmaniak J 1988 Autoantibodies to the thyrotropin receptor. Endocrinol Rev 9:106-121

392.     Adams DD 1988 Long-acting thyroid stimulator: how receptor autoimmunity was discovered. Autoimmunity 1:3-9

393.     McKenzie MJ, Zakarija M 1991 Antibodies in autoimmune thyroid disease. 6th. Edition ed. Philadelphia: J B Lippincott

394.     Ando T, Latif R, Davies TF 2005 Thyrotropin receptor antibodies: new insights into their actions and clinical relevance. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 19:33-52

395.     Noh JY, Hamada N, Inoue Y, Abe Y, Ito K, Ito K 2000 Thyroid-Stimulating Antibody is Related to Graves’ Ophthalmopathy, But Thyrotropin-Binding Inhibitor Immunoglobulin is Related to Hyperthyroidism in Patients with Graves’ Disease. Thyroid 10:809-813

396.     Mizutori Y, Chen CR, Latrofa F, McLachlan SM, Rapoport B 2009 Evidence that shed thyrotropin receptor A subunits drive affinity maturation of autoantibodies causing Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:927-935

397.     Gupta MK 32000 Thyrotropin-receptor antibodies in thyroid diseases: advances in detection techniques and clinical applications. Clin Chim Acta 293:1-29

398.     Morgenthaler NG, Ho SC, Minich WB 2007 Stimulating and blocking thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor autoantibodies from patients with Graves’ disease and autoimmune hypothyroidism have very similar concentration, TSH receptor affinity, and binding sites. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:1058-1065

399.     Yoshida K, Aizawa Y, Kaise N, Fukazawa H, Kiso Y, Sayama N, Mori K, Hori H, Abe K 1996 Relationship between thyroid-stimulating antibodies and thyrotropin-binding inhibitory immunoglobulins years after administration of radioiodine for Graves’ disease: retrospective clinical survey. J Endocrinol Invest 19:682-686

400.     Quadbeck B, Hoermann R, Hahn S, Roggenbuck U, Mann K, Janssen OE 2005 Binding, stimulating and blocking TSH receptor antibodies to the thyrotropin receptor as predictors of relapse of Graves’ disease after withdrawal of antithyroid treatment. Horm Metab Res 37:745-750

401.     McLachlan SM, Rapoport B 2013 Thyrotropin-blocking autoantibodies and thyroid-stimulating autoantibodies: potential mechanisms involved in the pendulum swinging from hypothyroidism to hyperthyroidism or vice versa. Thyroid 23:14-24

402.     Seetharamaiah GS, Kurosky A, Desai RK, Dallas JS, Prabhakar VS 1994 A recombinant extracellular domain of the thyrotropin (TSH) receptor bindsTSH in the absence of membranes. Endocrinol 134:549-554

403.     Sugawa H, Ueda Y, M. U, al e 1998 Immunization with the “immunogenic peptide” of TSH receptor induces oligoclonal antibodies with various biological activities. Peptides 19:1301-1307

404.     Davies TF, Ando T, Lin RY, Tomer Y, Latif R 2005 Thyrotropin receptor-associated diseases: from adenomata to Graves disease. J Clin Invest 115:1972-1983

405.     Takasu N, oshiro C, Akamine H, Komiya I, Nagata A, Sato Y, Yoshimura H, Ito K 1997 Thyroid-stimulating antibody and TSH-binding inhibitor immunoglobulin in 277 Graves’ patients and in 686 normal subjects. J Endocrinol Invest 20:452-461

406.     Kung AW, Jones BM 1998 A change from stimulatory to blocking antibody activity in Graves’ disease during pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:514-518

407.     Michalek K, Morshed SA, Latif R, Davies TF 2009 TSH receptor autoantibodies. Autoimmun Rev 9:113-116

408.     Kasagi K, Konishi J, Iida Y, Ikekubo K, Mori T, Kuma K, Torizuka K 1982 A new in vitro assay for human thyroid stimulator using cultured thyroid cells: effect of sodium chloride on adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate increase. 54:108-114

409.     Tokuda Y, Kasagi K, LidaY, Hatabu H, Hidaka A, Misaki T, Konishi J 1988 Sensitive, practical bioassay of thyrotropin, with use of FRTL-5 thyroid cells and magnetizable solid-phase-bound antibodies. Clin Chem 34:2360-2364

410.     McKenzie JM, Zakarija M 1976 LATS in Graves’ disease. Recent Prog Horm Res 33:29-57

411.     Kasagi K, Konishi J, Iida Y, Arai K, Endo K, Torizuka K 1987 A sensitive and practical assay for thyroid stimulating antibodies using FRTL-5 thyroid cells. Acta Endocrinol 115:30-36

412.     Morris JC, Hay ID, Nelson RE, Jiang N-S 1988 Clinical utility of thyrotropin-receptor antibody assays: comparison of radioreceptor and bioassay methods. Mayo Clin Proc 63:707-717

413.     Michelangeli VP, Munro DS, Poon CW, Frauman AG, Colman PG 1994 Measurement of thyroid stimulating immunoglobulins in a new cell line transfected with a functional human TSH receptor (JPO9 cells), compared with an assay using FRTL-5 cells. Clin Endocrinol 40:645-652

414.     Minich WB, Behr M, Loos U 1997 Expression of a functional tagged human thyrotropin receptor in HeLa cells using recombinant vaccinia virus. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diab 105:282-290

415.     Morgenthaler NG, Pampel I, Aust G, SeisslerJ, Scherbaum WA 1998 Application of a bioassay with CHO cells for the routine detection of stimulating and blocking autoantibodies to the TSH-receptor. Horm Metab Res 30:162-168

416.     Shewring G, Rees-Smith B 1982 An improved radioreceptor assay for TSH receptor antibodies. Clin Endocrinol 17:409-417

417.     Atger M, Misrahi M, Young J, Jolivet A, Orgiazzi J, Schaison G, Milgrom E 1999 Autoantibodies interacting with purified native thyrotropin receptor. Eur J Biochem 265:1022-1031

418.     Giuliani C, Cerrone D, Harii N, Thornton M, Kohn LD, Dagia NM, Fiore E, Bucci I, Chamblin T, Vitti P, Monaco F, Napolitano G 2012 A TSHr-LH/CGr chimera that measures functional TSAb in Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 897:E1106-1115

419.     Massart C, Gibassier J, d’Herbomez M 2009 Clinical value of M22-based assays for TSH-receptor antibody (TRAb) in the follow-up of antithyroid drug treated Graves’ disease: comparison with the second generation human TRAb assay. Clin Chim Acta 407:62-66

420.     Zöphel K, Roggenbuck D, Wunderlich G, Schott M 2010 Continuously increasing sensitivity over three generations of TSH receptor autoantibody assays. Horm Metab Res 42:900-902

421.     Schott M, Feldkamp J, Bathan C, Fritzen R, Scherbaum WA, Seissler J 2000 Detecting TSH-Receptor antibodies with the recombinant TBII assay: technical and clinical evaluation. Horm Metab Research 32:429-435

422.     Giovanella L, Ceriani L, Garancini S 2001 Clinical applications of the 2nd. generation assay for anti-TSH receptor antibodies in Graves’ disease. Evaluation in patients with negative 1st. generation test. Clin Chem Lab med 39:25-28

423.     Costagliola S, Morganthaler NG, Hoermann R, Badenhoop K, Struck J, Freitag D, Poertl s, Weglohner W, Hollidt JM, Quadbeck B, Dumont JE, Schumm-Draeger PM, Bergmann A, Mann K, Vassart G, Usadel KH 1999 Second generation assay for thyrotropin receptor antibodies has superior diagnostic sensitivity for Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:90-97

424.     Costagliola S, Swillens S, Niccoli P, Dumont JE, Vassart G, Ludgate M 1992 Binding assay for thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies  using the recombinant receptor protein. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 75:1540-1544

425.     Morgenthaler NG, Hodak K, Seissler J, Steinbrenner H, Pampel I, Gupta M, McGregor AM, Scherbaum WA, Banga JP 1999 Direct binding of thyrotropin receptor autoantibody to in vitro translated thyrotropin receptor: a comparison to radioreceptor assay and thyroid stimulating bioassay. Thyroid 9:466-475

426.     Feldt-Rasmussen 1994 Meta-analysis evaluation of the impact of thyrotropin receptor antiboides on long-term remission  after medical therapy of Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 78:98-102

427.     Cho BY, Shong MH, Yi KH, Lee HK, Koh CS, Min HK 1992 Evaluation of serum basal thyrotropin levels and thyrotropin receptor antibody levels and thyrotropin receptor antibody activities as prognostic markers for discontinuation of antithyroid drug treatment in patients with Graves’ disease. Clin Endocrinol 36:585-590

428.     Shibayama K, Ohyama Y, Yokota Y, Ohtsu S, Takubo N, Matsuura N 2005 Assays for thyroid-stimulating antibodies and thyrotropin-binding inhibitory immunoglobulins in children with Graves’ disease. Endoc J 52:505-510

429.     Pedersen IB, Knudsen N, Perrild H, Ovesen L, Laurberg P 2001 TSH-receptor antibody measurement for differentiation of hyperthyroidism into Graves’ disease and multinodular toxic goitre: a comparison of two competitive binding assays. Clin Endocrinol 55:381-390

430.     Tan K, Loh TP, Sethi S 2012 Lack of standardized description of TRAb assays. Endocrine

431.     Evans M, Sanders J, Tagami T, Sanders P, Young S, Roberts E, Wilmot J, Hu X, Kabelis K, Clark J, Holl S, Richards T, Collyer A, Furmaniak J, Smith BR 2010 Monoclonal autoantibodies to the TSH receptor, one with stimulating activity and one with blocking activity, obtained from the same blood sample. CLIN Endocrinol (Oxf) 73:404-412

432.     Bartalena L, Marcocci C, Bogazzi F, al e 1998 Relation between therapy for hyperthyroidism and the coourse of Graves’ disease. N Engl J Med 338:73-78

433.     Eckstein AK, Plicht M, Lax H, Neuhäuser M, Mann K, Lederbogen S, Heckmann C, Esser J, Morgenthaler NG 2006 Thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies are independent risk factors for Graves’ ophthalmopathy and help to predict severity and outcome of the disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:3464-3470

434.     Bech K 1983 Immunological aspects of Graves’ disease and importance of thyroid stimulating immunoglobulins. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) Suppl 103:5-38

435.     Feldt-Rasmussen U 1983 Serum thyroglobulin and thyroglobulin autoantibodies in thyroid disease. Allergy 38:369-387

436.     Nygaard B, Metcalfe RA, Phipps J, Weetman AP, Hegedus L 1999 Graves’ disease and thyroid-associated opthalopathy triggered by 131I treatment of non-toxic goitre. J Endocrinol Invest 22:481-485

437.     Gerding MN, van der Meer Jolanda WC, Broenink M, Bakker O, WM W, Prummel MF 2000 Association of thyrotropin receptor antibodies with the clinical features of Graves’ opthalmopathy. Clin Endocrinol 52:267-271

438.     Takamura Y, Nakano K, Uruno T, Ito Y, Miya A, Kobayashi K, Yokozawa T, Matsuzuka F, Kuma K, Miyauchi A 2003 Changes in serum TSH receptor antibody (TRAb) values in patients with Graves’ disease after total or subtotal thyroidectomy. Endoc J 50:595-601

439.     Zimmermann-Belsing T, Nygaard B, Rasmussen AK, Feldt-Rasmussen U 2002 Use of the 2nd generation TRAK human assay did not improve prediction of relapse after antithyroid medical therapy of Graves’ disease. Eur J Endocrinol 146:173-177

440.     Schott M, Morgenthaler NG, Fritzen R, Feldkamp J, Willenberg HS, Scherbaum WA, Seissler J 2004 Levels of autoantibodies against human TSH receptor predict relapse of hyperthyroidism in Graves’ disease. Horm Metab Res 36:92-96

441.     Morris JC 1998 Clinical use of immunological assays of TSH Receptor autoantibodies. Thyroid Today 21:1-7

442.     Michelangeli V, Poon C, taft J, Newnham H, Topliss D, Colman P 1998 The prognostic value of thyrotropin receptor antibody measurement in the early stages of treatment of Graves’ disease with antithyroid drugs. Thyroid 8:119-124

443.     McKenzie JM, Zakarija M 1992 Fetal and neonatal hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism due to maternal TSH receptor antibodies [Review}. Thyroid 2:155-159

444.     Nor Azlin MI, Bakin YD, Mustafa N, Wahab NA, Johari MJ, Kamarudin NA, Jamil MA 2010 Thyroid autoantibodies and associated complications during pregnancy. j Obstet Gynaecol 30:675-678

445.     Hamada N, Momotani N, Ishikawa N, Yoshimura Noh J, Okamoto Y, Konishi T, Ito K, Ito K 2011 Persistent high TRAb values during pregnancy predict increased risk of neonatal hyperthyroidism following radioiodine therapy for refractory hyperthyroidism. Endoc J 58:55-58

446.     Heithorn R, Hauffa BP, Reinwein D 1999 Thyroid antibodies in children of mothers with autoimmune thyroid disorders. Eur J Pediatr 158:24-28

447.     McLachlan SM, Rapoport B 2008 Thyroid peroxidase autoantibody epitopes revisited. Clin Endocrinol 69:526-527

448.     Jaume JC, Costante G, Nishikawa T, Phillips DI, Rapoport B, McLachlan SM 1995 Thyroid peroxidase autoantibody fingerprints in hypothyroid and euthyroid individuals. I. Cross-sectional study in elderly women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:994-999

449.     Jaume JC, Burek CL, Hoffman WH, Rose NR, McLachlan SM, Rapoport B 1996 Thyroid peroxidase autoantibody epitopic ‘fingerprints’ in juvenile Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: evidence for conservation over time and in families. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 104:115-123

450.     Czarnocka B, Szabolcs I, Pastuszko D, Feldkamp J, Dohán O, Podoba J, Wenzel B 1998 In old age the majority of thyroid peroxidase autoantibodies are directed to a single TPO domain irrespective of thyroid function and iodine intake. Clin Endocrinol 48:803-808

451.     Nielsen CH, Brix TH, Gardas A, Banga JP, Hegedüs L 2008 Epitope recognition patterns of thyroid peroxidase autoantibodies in healthy individuals and patients with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. Clin Endocrinol 69:664-668

452.     Ehlers M, Thiel A, Bernecker C, Porwol D, Papewalis C, Willenberg HS, Schinner S, Hautzel H, Scherbaum WA, Schott M 2012 Evidence of a combined cytotoxic thyroglobulin and thyroperoxidase epitope-specific cellular immunity in Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:1347-1354

453.     Trotter WR, Belyavin G, Waddams A 1957 Precipitating  and complement fixing antibodies in Hashimoto’s disease. Proc R Soc Med 50:961-?

454.     Cayzer I, Chalmers SR, Doniach d, Swana G 1978 An evaluation of two new haemagglutination tests for the rapid diagnosis of autoimmune thyroid disease. J Clin Pathol 31:1147-1151

455.     Mariotti S, Russova A, Pisani S, Pinchera A 1983 A new solid phase immunoradiometric assay for antithyroid microsomal antibody. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 56:467-473

456.     Czarnocka B, ruf J, Ferrand M, Carayon P, Lissitzky S 1985 Purification of the human thyroid peroxidase and its identification as the microsomal antigen involved in autoimmune thyroid diseases. FEBS Lett 190:147-152

457.     Mariotti S, Anelli S, Ruf J, Bechi R, Czarnocka B, Lombardi A, Carayon P, Pinchera A 1987 Comparison of serum thyroid microsomal and thyroid peroxidase autoantibodies in thyroid diseases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 65:987-993

458.     Hoier-Madsen M, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Hegedus L, Perrild H, Hansen HS 1984 Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for determination of thyroglobulin autoantibodies. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 92:377-382

459.     Ruf J, Czarnocka B, Ferrand M, Doullais F, Carayon P 1988 Novel routine assay of thyroperoxidase autoantibodies. Clin Chem 34:2231-2234

460.     Yokoyama N, Taurog A, Klee GG 1989 Thyroid peroxidase and thyroid microsomal autoantibodies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 68:766-773

461.     Beever K, Bradbury J, Phillips D, McLachlan SM, Pegg C, Goral A, Overbeck W, Feifel G, BR< S 1989 Highly sensitive assays of autoantibodies to thyroglobulin and to thyroid peroxidase. Clin Chem 35:1949-1954

462.     Groves CJ, Howells RD, Williams S, Darke C, Parkes AB 1990 Primary standardization for the ELISA of serum thyroperoxidase and thyroglobulin antibodies and their prevalence in a normal Welsh population. J Clin Lab Immunol 32:147-151

463.     Laurberg P, Pedersen KM, Vittinghus E, Ekelund S 1992 Sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for measurement of autoantibodies to human thyroid peroxidase. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 52:663-669

464.     Finke R, Bogner u, Kotulla P, Schleusener H 1994 Anti-TPO antibody determinations using different methods. Exp Clin Endocrinol 102:145-150

465.     La’ulu SL, Slev PR, Roberts WL 2007 Performance characteristics of 5 automated thyroglobulin autoantibody and thyroid peroxidase autoantibody assays. Clin Chim Acta 376:88-95

466.     Spencer CA, Takeuchi M, Kazarosyan M, Wang CC, Guttler RB, Singer PA, Fatemi S, LoPresti JS, Nicoloff JT 1998 Serum Thyroglobulin Autoantibodies: Prevalence, influence on serum thyroglobulin measurement and prognostic significance in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:1121-1127

467.     Ericsson UB, Christensen SB, Thorell JI 1985 A high prevalence of thyroglobulin autoantibodies in adults with and without thyroid disease as measured with a sensitive solid-phase immunosorbent radioassay. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 37:154-162

468.     Feldt-Rasmussen U, Hoin-Madsen M, Beck K, al e 1991 Anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies in thyroid disorders and non thyroid autoimmune diseases. Autoimmunity 9:245-251

469.     Meisinger C, Ittermann T, Wallaschofski H, Heier M, Below H, Kramer A, Döring A, Nauck M, Völzke H 2012 Geographic variations in the frequency of thyroid disorders and thyroid peroxidase antibodies in persons without former thyroid disease within Germany. Eur J Endocrinol 167:363-371

470.     Kasagi K, Takahashi N, Inoue G, Honda T, Kawachi Y, Izumi Y 2009 Thyroid function in Japanese adults as assessed by a general health checkup system in relation with thyroid-related antibodies and other clinical parameters. Thyroid 19:937-944

471.     Guo J, Jaume JC, Rapoport B, McLachlan SM 1997 Recombinant thyroid peroxidase-specific Fab converted to immunoglobulin G (IgG)molecules: evidence for thyroid cell damage by IgG1, but not IgG4, autoantibodies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:925-931

472.     Rebuffat SA, Nguyen B, Robert B, Castex F, Peraldi-Roux S 2008 Antithyroperoxidase antibody-dependent cytotoxicity in autoimmune thyroid disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:929-934

473.     Chiovato L, Bassi P, Santini F, Mammoli C, Lapi P, Carayon P, Pinchera A 1993 Antibodies producing complement-mediated thyroid cytotoxicity  in patients with atrophic or goitrous autoimmune thyroiditis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77:1700-1705

474.     Karanikas G, Schuetz M, Wahl K, Paul M, Kontur S, Pietschmann P, Kletter K, Dudczak R, Willheim M 2005 Relation of anti-TPO autoantibody titre and T-lymphocyte cytokine production patterns in Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. Clin Endocrinol 63:191-196

475.     Carmel R, Spencer CA 1982 Clinical and subclinical thyroid disorders associated with pernicious anemia. Observations on abnormal thyroid-stimulating hormone levels and on a possible association of blood group O with hyperthyroidism. Arch Intern Med 142:1465-1469

476.     Vestgaard M, Nielsen LR, Rasmussen AK, Damm P, Mathiesen ER 2008 Thyroid peroxidase antibodies in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes: impact on thyroid function, metabolic control and pregnancy outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87:1336-1342

477.     Nakamura H, Usa T, Motomura M, Ichikawa T, Nakao K, Kawasaki E, Tanaka M, Ishikawa K, Eguchi K 2008 Prevalence of interrelated autoantibodies in thyroid diseases and autoimmune disorders. J Endocrinol Invest 31:861-865

478.    Vanderpump MPJ, Tunbridge WMG, French JM, Appleton D, Bates D, Rodgers H, Evans JG, Clark F, Tunbridge F, Young ET 1995 The incidence of thyroid disorders in the community; a twenty year follow up of the Whickham survey. Clin Endocrinol 43:55-68

479.     Hutfless S, Matos P, Talor MV, Caturegli P, Rose NR 2011 Significance of prediagnostic thyroid antibodies in women with autoimmune thyroid disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:E1466-1471

480.     Huber G, Staub JJ, Meier C, Mitrache C, Guglielmetti M, Huber P, Braverman LE 2002 Prospective Study of the Spontaneous Course of Subclinical Hypothyroidism: Prognostic Value of Thyrotropin, Thyroid Reserve, and Thyroid Antibodies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:3221-3226

481.     Mariotti S, Barbesino G, Caturegli P, Atzeni F, Manetti L, Marinò M, Grasso L, Velluzzi F, Loviselli A, Pinchera A 1994 False negative results observed in anti-thyroid peroxidase autoantibody determination by competitive radioimmunoassays using monoclonal antibodies. Eur J Endocrinol 130:552-558

482.     Schmidt M, Voell M, Rahlff I, Dietlein M, Kobe C, Faust M, Schicha H 2008 Long-term follow-up of antithyroid peroxidase antibodies in patients with chronic autoimmune thyroiditis (Hashimoto’s thyroiditis) treated with levothyroxine. Thyroid 18:755-760

483.     Johnston AM, Eagles JM 1999 Lithium-associated clinical hypothyroidism. Prevalence and risk factors. Br J Psychiatry 175:336-339

484.     Bell TM, Bansal AS, Shorthouse C, et al 1999 Low titre autoantibodies predict autoimmune disease during inteferon alpha treatment of chronic hepatitis C. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 14:419-422

485.     Daniels GH 2001 Amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:3-8

486.     Martino E, Bartalena L, Bogazzi F, Braverman LE 2001 The effects of Amiodarone on the Thyroid. Endoc Rev 22:240-254

487.     Eskes SA, Wiersinga WM 2009 Amiodarone and thyroid. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 23:735-751

488.     Bocchetta A, Mossa P, Velluzzi F, Mariotti S, Zompo MD, Loviselli A 2001 Ten-year follow-up of thyroid function in lithium patients. J Clin Psychopharmacol 21:594-598

489.     Tsang W, Houlden RL 2009 Amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis: a review. Can J Cardiol 25:421-424

490.     Mecacci F, Parretti E, Cioni R, Lucchetti R, Magrini A, La Torre P, Mignosa M, Acanfora L, Mello G 2000 Thyroid autoimmunity and its association with non-organ-specific antibodies and subclinical alterations of thyroid function in women with a history of pregnancy loss or preeclampsia. J Reprod Immunol 46:39-50

491.     Stagnaro-Green A, Roman SH, Cobin RH, el-Harazy E, Alvarez-Marfany M, Davies TF 1990 Detection of at-risk pregnancy by means of highly sensitive assays for thyroid autoantibodies. JAMA 264:1422-1425

492.     Premawardhana LD, Parkes AB, AMMARI F, John R, Darke C, Adams H, Lazarus JH 2000 Postpartum thyroiditis and long-term thyroid status: prognostic influence of Thyroid Peroxidase Antibodies and ultrasound echogenicity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:71-75

493.     Bussen S, Steck T, Dietl J 2000 Increased prevalence of thyroid antibodies in euthyroid women with a history of recurrent in-vitro fertilization failure. Hum Reprod 15:545-548

494.     Muller AF, Drexhage HA, Berghout A 2001 Postpartum thyroiditis and autoimmune thyroiditis in women of childbearing age: recent insights and consequences for antenatal and postnatal care. Endocrinol Rev 22:605-630

495.     Vaquero E, Lazzarin N, De Carolis C, Valensise H, Moretti C, Romanini C 2000 Mild thyroid abnormalities and recurrent spontaneous abortion: diagnostic and therapeutical approach. Am J Reprod Immunol 43:204-208

496.     Kim CH, Chae HD, Kang BM, Chang YS 1998 Influence of antithyroid antibodies in euthyroid women on in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome. Am J Reprod Immunol 40:2-8

497.     Poppe K, Glinoer D, tournaye H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem a, Kaufman L, Velkeniers B 2003 Assisted reproduction and thyroid autoimmunity: an unfortunate combination? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:4149-4152

498.     Negro R, Formoso G, Mangieri T, Pezzarossa A, Dazzi D, Hassan H 2006 Levothyroxine treatment in euthyroid pregnant women with autoimmune thyroid disease: effects on obstetrical complications. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:2587-2591

499.     Negro R, Formoso G, Coppola L, Presicce G, Mangieri T, Pezzarossa A, Dazzi D 2007 Euthyroid women with autoimmune disease undergoing assisted reproduction technologies: the role of autoimmunity and thyroid function. J Endocrinol Invest 30:3-8

500.     Karakosta P, Alegakis D, Georgiou V, Roumeliotaki T, Fthenou E, Vassilaki M, Boumpas D, Castanas E, Kogevinas M, Chatzi L 2012 Thyroid Dysfunction and Autoantibodies in Early Pregnancy Are Associated with Increased Risk of Gestational Diabetes and Adverse Birth Outcomes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:4464-4472

501.     He X, Wang P, Wang Z, He X, Xu D, Wang B 2012 Thyroid antibodies and risk of preterm delivery: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Eur J Endocrinol 167:455-464

502.     McLachlan SM, Rapoport B 2004 Why measure thyroglobulin autoantibodies rather than thyroid peroxidase autoantibodies. Thyroid 14:510-520

503.     Krahn J, Dembinski T 2009 Thyroglobulin and anti-thyroglobulin assays in thyroid cancer monitoring. Clin Biochem 42:416-419

504.     Latrofa F, Ricci D, Montanelli L, Rocchi R, Piaggi P, Sisti E, Grasso L, Basolo F, Ugolini C, Pinchera A, Vitti P 2012 Thyroglobulin autoantibodies in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: comparison of different assays and evaluation of causes of discrepancies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:3974-3982

505.     Pickett AJ, Jones M, Evans C 2012 Causes of discordance between thyroglobulin antibody assays. Ann Clin Biochem 49:463-467

506.     Pinchera A, Mariotti S, Vitti P, tosi M, Grasso L, Facini F, Buti R, Baschieri L 1977 Interference of serum thyroglobulin in the radioassay for serum antithyroglobulin antibodies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 45:1077-1088

507.     Mariotti S, Pinchera A, Vitti P, Chiovato L, Marcocci C, Urbano C, Tosi M, Baschieri L 1978 Comparison of radioassay and haemagglutination methods for anti-thyroid microsomal antibodies. Clin Exp Immunol 34:118-125

508.     Gao Y, Yuan Z, Yu Y, Lu H 2007 Mutual interference between serum thyroglobulin and antithyroglobulin antibody in an automated chemiluminescent immunoassay. Clin Biochem 40:735-738

509.     Ruf J, Henry M, DeMicco C, Carayon P 1987 Characterization of monoclonal and autoimmune antibodies to thyroglobulin : application to clinical investigation. In: Hufner M, Reiners C, eds Thyroglobulin and thyrolobulin antibodies in the follow-up of thyroid cancer and endemic goiter Stuttgart: G Thieme Verlag:21-30

510.     Okosieme OE, Evans C, Moss L, Parkes AB, Premawardhana LD, Lazarus JH 2005 Thyroglobulin antibodies in serum of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer: relationship between epitope specificities and thyroglobulin recovery. Clin Chem 51:729-734

511.     Taylor KP, Parkington D, Bradbury S, Simpson HL, Jefferies SJ, Halsall DJ 2011 Concordance between thyroglobulin antibody assays. Ann Clin Biochem 48:367-369

512.     Jensen EA, Petersen PH, Blaabjerg O, Hansen PS, Brix TH, Hegedüs L 2006 Establishment of reference distributions and decision values for thyroid antibodies against thyroid peroxidase (TPOAb), thyroglobulin (TgAb) and the thyrotropin receptor (TRAb). Clin Chem Lab Med 44:991-998

513.     Ruf J, Carayon P, Lissitzky S 1985 Various expressions of a unique anti-human thyroglobulin antibody repertoire in normal state and autoimmune disease. Eur J Immunol 15:268-272

514.     Doullay F, Ruf J, Codaccioni JL, et al 1991 Prevalence of autoantibodies to thyroperoxidase in patients with various thyroid and autoimmune diseases. Autoimmunity 9:237-244

515.     Aras G, Gültekin SS, Küçük NO 2008 The additive clinical value of combined thyroglobulin and antithyroglobulin antibody measurements to define persistent and recurrent disease in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Nucl Med Commun 29:880-884

516.     Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, Kloos RT, Lee SL, Mandel SJ, Mazzaferri EL, McIver B, Sherman SI, Tuttle RM 2006 Management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Taskforce. Thyroid 16:109-142

517.     Kumar A, Shah Dh, Shrihari U, Dandekar SR, Vijayan U, Sharma SM 1994 Significance of antithyroglobulin autoantibodies in differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 4:199-202

518.     Gorges R, Maniecki M, Jentzen W, Sheu SN, Mann K, Bockisch A, Janssen OE 2005 Development and clinical impact of thyroglobulin antibodies in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma during the first 3 years after thyroidectomy. Eur J Endocrinol 153:49-55

519.     Spencer CA 2011 Clinical Review: Clinical utility of Thyroglobulin Antibody (TgAb) Measurements for Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancers (DTC). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:3615-3627

520.     Kim WG, Yoon JH, Kim WB, Kim TY, Kim EY, Kim JM, Ryu JS, Gong G, Hong SJ, Shong YK 2008 Change of serum antithyroglobulin antibody levels is useful for prediction of clinical recurrence in thyroglobulin-negative patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:4683-4689

521.     Pacini F, Mariotti S, Formica N, Elisei R 1988 Thyroid autoantibodies in thyroid cancer: Incidence and relationship with tumor outcome. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 119:373-380

522.     Rubello D, Casara D, Girelli ME, Piccolo M, Busnardo B 1992 Clinical meaning of circulating antithyroglobulin antibodies in differentiated thyroid cancer: a prospective study. J Nucl Med 33:1478-1480

523.     Spencer CA 2003 New Insights for Using Serum Thyroglobulin (Tg) Measurement for Managing Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Carcinomas. Thyroid International 4:1-14

524.     Chiovato L, Latrofa F, Braverman LE, Pacini F, Capezzone M, Masserini L, Grasso L, Pinchera A 2003 Disappearance of humoral thyroid autoimmunity after complete removal of thyroid antigens. Ann Intern Med 139:346-351

525.     Spencer C 2011 Clinical review: Clinical utility of thyroglobulin antibody (TgAb) measurements for patients with differentiated thyroid cancers (DTC). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:3615-3627

526.     Weigle WO, High GJ 1967 The behaviour of autologous thyroglobulin in the circulation of rabbits immunized with either heterologous or altered homologous thyroglobulin. J Immunol 98:1105-1114

527.     Feldt-Rasmussen U, Blichert-Toft M, Christiansen C, Date J 1982 Serum thyroglobulin and its autoantibody following subtotal thyroid resection of Graves’ disease. Eur J Clin Invest 12:203-208

528.     Benvenga S, Bartolone L, Squadrito S, Trimarchi F 1997 Thyroid hormone autoantibodies elicited by diagnostic fine needle biopsy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:4217-4223

529.     Polyzos SA, Anastasilakis AD 2010 Alterations in serum thyroid-related constituents after thyroid fine-needle biopsy: a systematic review. Thyroid 20:265-271

530.     Izumi M, Larsen PR 1978 Correlation of sequential changes in serum thyroglobulin, triiodothyronine, and thyroxine in patients with Graves’ disease and subacute thyroiditis. Metabolism 27:449-460

531.     Feldt-Rasmussen U, Bech K, Date J, Hyltoft Pedersen P, Johansen K, Nistrup Madsen S 1982 Thyroid stimulating antibodies, thyroglobulin antibodies and serum proteins during treatment of Graves’ disease with radioiodine or propylthiouracil. Allergy 37:161-167

532.     Feldt-Rasmussen U, Bech K, Date J, Petersen PH, Johansen K 1982 A prospective study of the differential changes in serum thyroglobulin and its autoantibodies during propylthiouracil or radioiodine therapy of patients with Graves’ disease. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 99:379-385

533.     Rubio IG, Silva MN, Knobel M, Romão R, Possato R, Gebrin EM, Buchpiguel C, Medeiros-Neto G 2007 Peripheral blood levels of thyroglobulin mRNA and serum thyroglobulin concentrations after radioiodine ablation of multinodular goiter with or without pre-treatment with recombinant human thyrotropin. J Endocrinol Invest 30:535-540

534.     Tomer Y, Greenberg D 2004 The thyroglobulin gene as the first thyroid-specific susceptibility gene for autoimmune thyroid disease. Trends Mol Med 10:306-308

535.     Vali M, Rose NR, Caturegli P 2000 Thyroglobulin as autoantigen: structure-function relationships. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 1:69-77

536.     Knobel M, Medeiros-Neto G 2003 An outline of inherited disorders of the thyroid hormone generating system. Thyroid 13:771-801

537.     Niu DM, Hsu JH, Chong KW, Huang CH, Lu YH, Kao CH, Yu HC, Lo MY, Jap TS 2009 Six new mutations of the thyroglobulin gene discovered in taiwanese children presenting with thyroid dyshormonogenesis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:5045-5052

538.     Citterio CE, Machiavelli GA, Miras MB, Gruñeiro-Papendieck L, Lachlan K, Sobrero G, Chiesa A, Walker J, Muñoz L, Testa G, Belforte FS, González-Sarmiento R, Rivolta CM, Targovnik HM 2013 New insights into thyroglobulin gene: Molecular analysis of seven novel mutations associated with goiter and hypothyroidism. Mol Cell Endocrinol 365:277-291

539.     Fugazzola L, Persani L, Mannavola D, Reschini E, Vannucchi G, Weber G, Beck-Peccoz P 2003 Recombinant human TSH testing is a valuable tool for differential diagnosis of congenital hypothyroidism during L-thyroxine replacement. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 59:230-236

540.     Simsek E, Karabay M, Kocabay K 2005 Neonatal screening for congenital hypothyroidism in West Black Sea area, Turkey. Int J Clin Pract 59:336-341

541.     Mariotti S, Martino E, Cupini C, Lari R, Giani C, Baschieri L, Pinchera A 1982 Low serum thyroglobulin as a clue to the diagnosis of thyrotoxicosis factitia. N Engl J Med 307:410-412

542.     Pacini F, Pinchera A 1999 Serum and tissue thyroglobulin measurement: clinical applications in thyroid disease. Biochimie 81:463-467

543.     Chow E, Siddique F, Gama R 2008 Thyrotoxicosis factitia: role of thyroglobulin. Ann Clin Biochem 45:447-448

544.     Torrens JI, Burch HB 2001 Serum thyroglobulin measurement. Utility in clinical practice. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Amer 30:429-467

545.     Fugazzola L, Mihalich A, Persani L, Cerutti N, Reina M, Bonomi M, Ponti E, Mannavola D, Giammona E, Vannucchi G, di Blasio AM, Beck-Peccoz P 2002 Highly sensitive serum thyroglobulin and circulating thyroglobulin mRNA evaluations in the management of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer in apparent remission. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:3201-3208

546.     Iervasi A, Iervasi G, Carpi A, Zucchelli GC 2006 Serum thyroglobulin measurement: clinical background and main methodological aspects with clinical impact. Biomed Pharmacother 60:414-424

547.     Spencer CA, Lopresti JS 2008 Measuring thyroglobulin and thyroglobulin autoantibody in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 4:223-233

548.     Spencer CA, Petrovic I 2010 Thyroglobuin measurement. In: Thyroid Function Testing Editor Gregory Brent MD Springer Science, MA, USA

549.     Tuttle RM, Leboeuf R 2008 Follow up Approaches in Thyroid Cancer: A Risk Adapted Paradigm. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 37:419-435

550.     Lin JD 2008 Thyroglobulin and human thyroid cancer. Clin Chim Acta 388:15-21

551.     Brassard M, Borget I, Edet-Sanson A, Giraudet AL, Mundler O, Toubeau M, Bonichon F, Borson-Chazot F, Leenhardt L, Schvartz C, Dejax C, Brenot-Rossi I, Toubert ME, Torlontano M, Benhamou E, Schlumberger M 2011 Long-term follow-up of patients with papillary and follicular thyroid cancer: a prospective study on 715 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:1352-1359

552.     Van den Briel T, West CE, Hautvast JG, Vulsma T, de Vijlder JJ, Ategbo EA 2001 Serum thyroglobulin and urinary iodine concentration are the most appropriate indicators of iodine status and thyroid function under conditions of increasing iodine supply in schoolchildren in Benin. J Nutr 131:2701-2706

553.     Vejbjerg P, Knudsen N, Perrild H, Laurberg P, Carlé A, Pedersen IB, Rasmussen LB, Ovesen L, Jørgensen T 2009 Thyroglobulin as a marker of iodine nutrition status in the general population. Eur J Endocrinol 161:475-481

554.     Schlumberger M, Hitzel A, Toubert ME, Corone C, Troalen F, Schlageter MH, Claustrat F, Koscielny S, Taieb D, Toubeau M, Bonichon F, Borson-Chazot F, Leenhardt L, Schvartz C, Dejax C, Brenot-Rossi I, Torlontano M, Tenenbaum F, Bardet S, Bussiere F, Girard JJ, Morel O, Schneegans O, Schlienger JL, Prost A, So D, Archambaud F, Ricard M, Benhamou E 2007 Comparison of seven serum thyroglobulin assays in the follow-up of papillary and follicular thyroid cancer patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:2487-2495

555.     Clark P, Franklyn J 2012 Can we interpret serum thyroglobulin results? Ann Clin Biochem 49:313-322

556.     Preissner CM, O’Kane DJ, Singh RJ, Morris JC, Grebe SKG 2003 Phantoms in the assay tube: heterophile antibody interferences in serum thyroglobulin assays. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:3069-3074

557.     Spencer CA, Fatemi S, Singer p, Nicoloff JT, LoPresti JS 2010 Serum Basal Thyroglobulin Measured by A 2nd Generation Assay Correlates with the Recombinant Human TSH-Stimulated Thyroglobulin Response in Patients Treated for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. . Thyroid 20:587-595

558.     Giovanella L, Ghelfo A 2007 Undetectable serum thyroglobulin due to negative interference of heterophile antibodies in relapsing thyroid carcinoma. Clin Chem 53:1871-1872

559.     Giovanella L, Keller F, Ceriani L, Tozzoli R 2009 Heterophile antibodies may falsely increase or decrease thyroglobulin measurement in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Clin Chem Lab Med 47:952-954

560.     Verburg FA, Wäschle K, Reiners C, Giovanella L, Lentjes EG 2010 Heterophile Antibodies Rarely Influence the Measurement of Thyroglobulin and Thyroglobulin Antibodies in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Patients. Horm Metab Res 42:736-739

561.     Selby C 1999 Interference in immunoassay. Ann Clin Biochem 36:704-721

562.     Giovanella L, Ceriani L, Suriano S, Ghelfo A, Maffioli M 2008 Thyroglobulin measurement before rhTSH-aided (131)I ablation in detecting metastases from differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 68:659-663

563.     Clark PM, Beckett G 2002 Can we measure serum thyroglobulin? Ann Clin Biochem 39:196-202

564.     Feldt-Rasmussen U, Petersen PH, Blaabjerg O, Horder M 1980 Long-term variability in serum thyroglobulin and thyroid related hormones in healthy subjects. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 95:328-334

565.     de Micco C, Ruf J, Carayon P, Chrestian MA, Henry JF, Toga M 1987 Immunohistochemical study of thyroglobulin in thyroid carcinomas with monoclonal antibodies. Cancer 59:471-476

566.     Kim PS, Dunn AD, Dunn JT 1988 Altered immunoreactivity of thyroglobulin in thyroid disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 67:161-168

567.     Schulz R, Bethauser H, Stempka L, Heilig B, Moll A, Hufner M 1989 Evidence for immunological differences between circulating and tissue-derived thyroglobulin in men. Eur J Clin Invest 19:459-463

568.     Zucchelli G, Iervasi A, Ferdeghini M, Iervasi G 2009 Serum thyroglobulin measurement in the follow-up of patients treated for differentiated thyroid cancer. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 53:482-489

569.     Ross HA, Netea-Maier RT, Schakenraad E, Bravenboer B, Hermus AR, Sweep FC 2008 Assay bias may invalidate decision limits and affect comparability of serum thyroglobulin assay methods: an approach to reduce interpretation differences. Clin Chim Acta 394:104-109

570.     Spencer CA, Wang CC 1995 Thyroglobulin measurement:- Techniques, clinical benefits and pitfalls. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Amer 24:841-863

571.     Giovanella L, Ceriani L 2011 Comparison of thyroglobulin antibody interference in first- and second-generation thyroglobulin immunoassays. Clin Chem Lab Med 49:1025-1027

572.     Zophel K, Wunderlich G, Smith BR 2003 Serum thyroglobulin measurements with a high sensitivity enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: is there a clinical benefit in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma? Thyroid 13:861-865

573.     Iervasi A, Iervasi G, Ferdeghini M, Solimeo C, Bottoni A, Rossi L, Colato C, Zucchelli GC 2007 Clinical relevance of highly sensitive Tg assay in monitoring patients treated for differentiated thyroid cancer. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 67:434-441

574.     Giovanella L 2008 Highly sensitive thyroglobulin measurements in differentiated thyroid carcinoma managemen. Clin Chem Lab Med 46:1067-1073

575.     Gardner DF, Rothman J, Utiger RD 1979 Serum thyroglobulin in normal subjects and patients with hyperthyroidism due to Graves’ disease: effects of T3, iodide, 131I and antithyroid drugs. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 11:585-594

576.     Rosario PW, Borges MA, Fagundes TA, Franco AC, Purisch S 2005 Is stimulation of thyroglobulin (Tg) useful in low-risk patients with thyroid carcinoma and undetectable Tg on thyroxin and negative neck ultrasound? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 62

577.     Kloos RT, Mazzaferri EL 2005 A single recombinant human thyrotropin-stimulated serum thyroglobulin measurement predicts differentiated thyroid carcinoma metastases three to five years later. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:5047-5057

578.     Smallridge RC, Meek SE, Morgan MA, Gates GS, Fox TP, Grebe S, Fatourechi V 2007 Monitoring thyroglobulin in a sensitive immunoassay has comparable sensitivity to recombinant human tsh-stimulated thyroglobulin in follow-up of thyroid cancer patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:82-87

579.     Mazzaferri EL 2007 Will highly sensitive thyroglobulin assays change the management of thyroid cancer? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 67:321-323

580.     Persoon AC, Jager PL, Sluiter WJ, Plukker JT, Wolffenbuttel BH, Links TP 2007 A sensitive Tg assay or rhTSH stimulated Tg: what’s the best in the long-term follow-up of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2:e816

581.     Chindris AM, Diehl NN, Crook JE, Fatourechi V, Smallridge RC 2012 Undetectable Sensitive Serum Thyroglobulin (<0.1 ng/ml) in 163 Patients with Follicular Cell-Derived Thyroid Cancer: Results of rhTSH Stimulation and Neck Ultrasonography and Long-Term Biochemical and Clinical Follow-Up. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:2714-2723

582.     Bachelot A, Cailleux AF, Klain M, Baudin E, Ricard M, Bellon N, Caillou B, Travagli JP, Schlumberger M 2002 Relationship between tumor burden and serum thyroglobulin level in patients with papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 12:707-711

583.     Pacini F, Molinaro E, Castagna MG, Agate L, Elisei R, Ceccarelli C, Lippi F, Taddei D, Grasso L, Pinchera A 2003 Recombinant human thyrotropin-stimulated serum thyroglobulin combined with neck ultrasonography has the highest sensitivity in monitoring differentiated thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:3668-3673

584.     Heilo A, Sigstad E, Fagerlid KH, Håskjold OI, Grøholt KK, Berner A, Bjøro T, Jørgensen LH 2011 Efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous ethanol injection treatment in patients with a limited number of metastatic cervical lymph nodes from papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:2750-2755

585.     Cole TG, Johnson D, Eveland BJ, Nahm MH 1993 Cost-effective method for detection of “hook effect” in tumor marker immunometric assays. Clin Chem 39:695-696

586.     Basuyau JP, Leroy M, Brunelle P 2001 Determination of Tumor Markers in Serum. Pitfalls and Good Practice. Clin Chem Lab Med 39:1227-1233

587.     Leboeuf R, Langlois MF, Martin M, Ahnadi CE, Fink GD 2006 “Hook effect” in calcitonin immunoradiometric assay in patients with metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma: case report and review of the literature. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:361-364

588.     Jassam N, Jones CM, Briscoe T, Horner JH 2006 The hook effect: a need for constant vigilance. Ann Clin Biochem 43:314-317

589.     Schofl C, Schofl-Siegert B, Karstens JH, Bremer M, Lenarz T, Cuarezma JS, Samii M, von zur Muhlen A, Brabant G 2002 Falsely low serum prolactin in two cases of invasive macroprolactinoma. Pituitary 5:261-265

590.     Morgenthaler NG, Froehlich J, Rendl J, Willnich M, Alonso C, Bergmann A, Reiners C 2002 Technical evaluation of a new immunoradiometric and a new immunoluminometric assay for thyroglobulin. Clin Chem 48:1077-1083

591.     Chung JK, Park YJ, Kim TY, So Y, Kim SK, Park DJ, Lee DS, Lee MC, Cho BY 2002 Clinical significance of elevated level of serum antithyroglobulin antibody in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer after thyroid ablation. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 57:215-221

592.     Phan HT, Jager PL, van der Wal JE, Sluiter WJ, Plukker JT, Dierckx RA, Wolffenbuttel BH, Links TP 2008 The follow-up of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer and undetectable thyroglobulin (Tg) and Tg antibodies during ablation. Eur J Endocrinol 158:77-83

593.     Seo JH, Lee SW, Ahn BC, Lee J 2010 Recurrence detection in differentiated thyroid cancer patients with elevated serum level of antithyroglobulin antibody: special emphasis on using (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 72:558-563

594.     Kim ES, Lim DJ, Baek KH, Lee JM, Kim MK, Kwon HS, Song KH, Kang MI, Cha BY, Lee KW, Son HY 2010 Thyroglobulin Antibody Is Associated with Increased Cancer Risk in Thyroid Nodules. Thyroid 20:885-891

595.     Cubero JM, Rodríguez-Espinosa J, Gelpi C, Estorch M, Corcoy R 2003 Thyroglobulin autoantibody levels below the cut-off for positivity can interfere with thyroglobulin measurement. Thyroid 13:659-661

596.     Rosário PW, Maia FF, Fagundes TA, Vasconcelos FP, Cardoso LD, Purisch S 2004 Antithyroglobulin antibodies in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma: methods of detection, interference with serum thyroglobulin measurement and clinical significance. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol 48:487-492

597.     Madureira D, Prazeres S, Pedro MS, Pereira T, Font AP, Bugalho MJ 2008 In vitro assays to test the interference of anti-thyroglobulin antibodies on thyroglobulin measurement. Endocrine 33:40-44

598.     Spencer CA 1996 Recoveries cannot be used to authenticate thyroglobulin (Tg) measurements when sera contain Tg autoantibodies. Clin Chem 42:661-663

599.     Schaadt B, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Rasmussen B, Torring H, Foder B, Jorgensen K, Sand Hansen H 1995 Assessment of the influence of thyroglobulin (Tg) autoantibodies and other interfering factors on the use of serum Tg as tumor marker in differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 5:165-170

600.     Schneider AB, Pervos R 1978 Radioimmunoassay of human thyroglobulin: effect of antithyroglobulin autoantibodies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 47:126-137

601.     Feldt-Rasmussen U, Schlumberger M 1988 European interlaboratory comparison of serum thyroglobulin measurement. J Endocrinol Invest 11:175-181

602.     Weightman DR, Mallick UK, Fenwick JD, Perros P 2003 Discordant serum thyroglobulin results generated by two classes of assay in patients with thyroid carcinoma: correlation with clinical outcome after 3 years of follow-up. Cancer 98:41-47

603.     Jahagirdar VR, Strouhal P, Holder G, Gama R, Singh BM 2008 Thyrotoxicosis factitia masquerading as recurrent Graves’ disease: endogenous antibody immunoassay interference, a pitfall for the unwary. Ann Clin Biochem 45:325-327

604.     Mariotti S, Barbesino G, Caturegli P, Marino M, Manetti L, Pacini F, Centoni R, Pinchera A 1995 Assay of thyroglobulin in serum with thyroglobulin autoantibodies: an unobtainable goal? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:468-472

605.     Marquet PY, Daver A, Sapin R, Bridgi B, Muratet JP, Hartmann DJ, Paolucci F, Pau B 1996 Highly sensitive immunoradiometric assay for serum thyroglobulin with minimal interference from autoantibodies. Clin Chem 42:258-262

606.     Haapala AM, Soppi E, Morsky P, al. e 1995 Thyroid antibodies in association with thyroid malignancy II: qualitative properties of thyroglobulin antibodies. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 55:317-322

607.     Bayer MF, Kriss JP 1979 Immunoradiometric assay for serum thyroglobulin: semiquantitative measurement of thyroglobulin in antithyroglobulin-positive sera. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 49:557-564

608.     Black EG, Hoffenberg R 1983 Should one measure serum thyroglobulin in the presence of anti-thyroglobulin antibodies? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 19:597-601

609.     Rago T, Di Coscio G, Ugolini C, Scutari M, Basolo F, Latrofa F, Romani R, Berti P, Grasso L, Braverman LE, Pinchera A, Vitti P 2007 Clinical features of thyroid autoimmunity are associated with thyroiditis on histology and are not predictive of malignancy in 570 patients with indeterminate nodules on cytology who had a thyroidectomy. Clin Endocrinol 67:363-369

610.     Fiore E, Rago T, Scutari M, Ugolini C, Proietti A, Di Coscio G, Provenzale MA, Berti P, Grasso L, Mariotti S, Pinchera A, Vitti P 2009 Papillary thyroid cancer, although strongly associated with lymphocytic infiltration on histology, is only weakly predicted by serum thyroid auto-antibodies in patients with nodular thyroid diseases. J Endocrinol Invest 32:344-351

611.     Fiore E, Rago T, Provenzale MA, Scutari M, Ugolini C, Basolo F, Di Coscio G, Berti P, Grasso L, Elisei R, Pinchera A, Vitti P 2009 Lower levels of TSH are associated with a lower risk of papillary thyroid cancer in patients with thyroid nodular disease: thyroid autonomy may play a protective role. Endoc Relat Cancer 16:1251-1260

612.     Souza SL, Assumpcao LVM, Ward LS 2003 Impact of previous thyroid autoimmune disease on prognosis of patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 13:491-495

613.     Küçük ON, Aras G, Kulak HA, Ibiş E 2006 Clinical importance of anti-thyroglobulin auto-antibodies in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma: comparison with 99mTc-MIBI scans. Nucl Med Commun 27:873-876

614.     Thomas D, Liakos V, Vassiliou E, Hatzimarkou F, Tsatsoulis A, Kaldrimides P 2007 Possible reasons for different pattern disappeaance of thyroglobulin and thyroid peroxidase autoantibodies in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma following total thyroidectomy and iodine-131 ablation. J Endocrinol Invest 30:173-180

615.     Sapin R, d’Herbomez M, Gasser F, Meyer L, Schlienger JL 2003 Increased sensitivity of a new assay for anti-thyroglobulin antibody detection in patients with autoimmune thyroid disease. Clin Biochem 36:611-616

616.     Davies L, Welch HG 2006 Increasing incidence of thyroid cancer in the United States, 1973-2002. JAMA 295:2164-2167

617.     Cairong Zhu, Tongzhang Zheng, Briseis A. Kilfoy, Xuesong Han, Shuangge Ma, Yue Ba, Yana Bai, Rong Wang, Yong Zhu, Zhang Y 2009 A Birth Cohort Analysis of the Incidence of Papillary Thyroid Cancer in the United States, 1973–2004. Thyroid 19:1061-1066

618.     Mazzaferri EL, Kloos RT 2001 Current Approaches to Primary Therapy for Papillary and Follicular Thyroid Cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:1447-1463

619.     Hay ID, Thompson GB, Grant CS, Bergstralh EJ, Dvorak CE, Gorman CA, Maurer MS, McIver B, Mullan BP, Oberg AL, Powell CC, van Heerden JA, Goellner JR 2002 Papillary thyroid carcinoma managed at the Mayo Clinic during six decades (1940-1999): temporal trends in initial therapy and long-term outcome in 2444 consecutively treated patients. World J Surg 26:879-885

620.     Mazzaferri EL, Kloos RT 2002 Is diagnostic iodine-131 scanning with recombinant human TSH useful in the follow-up of differentiated thyroid cancer after thyroid ablation? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:1486-1489

621.     Durante C, Puxeddu E, Ferretti E, Morisi R, Moretti S, Bruno R, Barbi F, Avenia N, Scipioni A, Verrienti A, Tosi E, Cavaliere A, Gulino A, Filetti S, Russo D 2007 BRAF mutations in papillary thyroid carcinomas inhibit genes involved in iodine metabolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:2840-2843

622.     Gibelli B, Tredici P, De Cicco C, Bodei L, Sandri MT, Renne G, Bruschini R, Tradati N 2005 Preoperative determination of serum thyroglobulin to identify patients with differentiated thyroid cancer who may present recurrence without increased thyroglobulin. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 25:94-99

623.     Giovanella L, Ceriani L, Ghelfo A, Maffioli M, Keller F 2007 Preoperative undetectable serum thyroglobulin in differentiated thyroid carcinoma: incidence, causes and management strategy. Clin Endocrinol 67:547-551

624.     Ericsson UB, Tegler L, Lennquist S, Christensen SB, Ståhl E, Thorell JI 1984 Serum thyroglobulin in differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Acta Chir Scand 150:367-375

625.     Hrafnkelsson J, Tulinius H, Kjeld M, Sigvaldason H, Jonasson JG 2000 Serum thyroglobulin as a risk factor for thyroid carcinoma. Acta Oncol 39:973-977

626.     Sands NB, Karls S, Rivera J, Tamilia M, Hier MP, Black MJ, Gologan O, Payne RJ 2010 Preoperative serum thyroglobulin as an adjunct to fine-needle aspiration in predicting well-differentiated thyroid cancer. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 39:669-673

627.     Petric R, Perhavec A, Gazic B, Besic N 2011 Preoperative serum thyroglobulin concentration is an independent predictive factor of malignancy in follicular neoplasms of the thyroid gland. J Surg Oncol in press

628.     Lee EK, Chung KW, Min HS, Kim TS, Kim TH, Ryu JS, Jung YS, Kim SK, Lee YJ 2012 Preoperative serum thyroglobulin as a useful predictive marker to differentiate follicular thyroid cancer from benign nodules in indeterminate nodules. J Korean Med Sci 27:1014-1018

629.     Lazar V, Bidart JM, Caillou B, Mahe C, Lacroix L, Filetti S, Schlumberger M 1999 Expression of the Na+/I- symporter gene in human thyroid tumors: a comparison study with other thyroid-specific genes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:3228-3234

630.     Ronga G, Filesi M, Ventroni G, Vestri AR, Signore A 1999 Value of the first serum thyroglobulin level after total thyroidectomy for the diagnosis of metastases from differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med 26:1448-1452

631.     Lima N, Cavaliere E, Tomimori E, Knobel M, Medeieros-Neto G 2002 Prognostic value of serial serum thyroglobulin determinations after total thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer. J Endocrinol Invest 25:110-115

632.     Lin JD, Huang MJ, Hsu BR, Chao TC, Hsueh C, Liu FH, Liou MJ, Weng HF 2002 Significance of postoperative serum thyroglobulin levels in patients with papillary and follicular thyroid carcinomas. J Surg Oncol 80:45-51

633.     Hall FT, Beasley NJ, Eski SJ, Witterick IJ, Walfish PG, Freeman JL 2003 Predictive value of serum thyroglobulin after surgery for thyroid carcinoma. Laryngoscope 113:77-81

634.     Toubeau M, Touzery C, Arveux P, Chaplain G, Vaillant G, Berriolo A, Riedinger JM, Boichot C, Cochet A, Brunotte F 2004 Predictive value for disease progression of serum thyroglobulin levels measured in the postoperative period and after (131)I ablation therapy in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. J Nucl Med 45:988-994

635.     Kim TY, Kim WB, Kim ES, Ryu JS, Yeo JS, Kim SC, Hong SJ, Shong YK 2005 Serum thyroglobulin levels at the time of 131I remnant ablation just after thyroidectomy are useful for early prediction of clinical recurrence in low-risk patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:1440-1445

636.     Makarewicz J, Adamczewski Z, Knapska-Kucharska M, Lewiński A 2006 Evaluation of the diagnostic value of the first thyroglobulin determination in detecting metastases after differentiated thyroid carcinoma surgery. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 114:485-489

637.     Heemstra KA, Liu YY, Stokkel M, Kievit J, Corssmit E, Pereira AM, Romijn JA, Smit JW 2007 Serum thyroglobulin concentrations predict disease-free remission and death in differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 66:58-64

638.     Shih ML, Lee JA, Hsieh CB, Yu JC, Liu HD, Kebebew E, Clark OH, Duh QY 2008 Thyroidectomy for Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: complications and associated cance. Thyroid 18:729-734

639.     Baudin E, Do Cao C, Cailleux AF, Leboulleux S, Travagli JP, Schlumberger M 2003 Positive predictive value of serum thyroglobulin levels, measured during the first year of follow-up after thyroid hormone withdrawal, in thyroid cancer patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:1107-1111

640.     Miyauchi A, Kudo T, Miya A, Kobayashi K, Ito Y, Takamura Y, Higashiyama T, Fukushima M, Kihara M, Inoue H, Tomoda C, Yabuta T, Masuoka H 2011 Prognostic impact of serum thyroglobulin doubling-time under thyrotropin suppression in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma who underwent total thyroidectomy. Thyroid 21:707-716

641.     Huang SH, Wang PW, Huang YE, Chou FF, Liu RT, Tung SC, Chen JF, Kuo MC, Hsieh JR, Hsieh HH 2006 Sequential follow-up of serum thyroglobulin and whole body scan in thyroid cancer patients without initial metastasis. Thyroid 16:1273-1278

642.     Pacini F, Agate L, Elisei R, Capezzone M, Ceccarelli C, Lippi F, Molinaro E, Pinchera A 2001 Outcome of differentiated thyroid cancer with detectable serum Tg and negative diagnostic (131)I whole body scan: comparison of patients treated with high (131)I activities versus untreated patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:4092-4097

643.     Schaap J, Eustatia-Rutten CF, Stokkel M, Links TP, Diamant M, van der Velde EA, Romijn JA, Smit JW 2002 Does radioiodine therapy have disadvantageous effects in non-iodine accumulating differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 57:117-124

644.     Valadão MM, Rosário PW, Borges MA, Costa GB, Rezende LL, Padrão EL, Barroso AL, Purisch S 2006 Positive predictive value of detectable stimulated tg during the first year after therapy of thyroid cancer and the value of comparison with Tg-ablation and Tg measured after 24 months. Thyroid 16:1145-1149

645.     Rosario P, Borges M, Reis J, Alves MF 2006 Effect of suppressive therapy with levothyroxine on the reduction of serum thyroglobulin after total thyroidectomy. Thyroid 16:199-200

646.     Robbins RJ, Srivastava S, Shaha A, Ghossein R, Larson SM, Fleisher M, Tuttle RM 2004 Factors influencing the basal and recombinant human thyrotropin-stimulated serum thyroglobulin in patients with metastatic thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:6010-6016

647.     Haugen BR, Ladenson PW, Cooper DS, Pacini F, Reiners C, Luster M, Schlumberger M, Sherman SI, Samuels M, Graham K, Braverman LE, Skarulis MC, Davies TF, DeGroot L, Mazzaferri EL, Daniels GH, Ross DC, Becker DV, Mazon HR, Cavalieri RR, Spencer CA, McEllin K, Weintraub BD, EC. R 1999 A comparison of Recombinant Human Thyrotropin and Thyroid Hormone Withdrawal for the Detection of Thyroid Remnant or Cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:3877-3885

648.     Spencer CA, LoPresti JS, Fatemi S, Nicoloff JT 1999 Detection of residual and recurrent differentiated thyroid carcinoma by serum Thyroglobulin measurement. Thyroid 9:435-441

649.     Pacini F, Castagna MG 2008 Diagnostic and therapeutic use of recombinant human TSH (rhTSH) in differentiated thyroid cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 22:1009-1021

650.     Mazzaferri EL, Robbins RJ, Spencer CA, Braverman LE, Pacini F, Wartofsky L, Haugen BR, Sherman SI, Cooper DS, Braunstein GD, Lee S, Davies TF, Arafah BM, Ladenson PW, Pinchera A 2003 A consensus report of the role of serum thyroglobulin as a monitoring method for low-risk patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:1433-1441

651.     Vitale G, Lupoli GA, Ciccarelli A, Lucariello A, Fittipaldi MR, Fonderico F, Panico A, Lupoli G 2003 Influence of body surface area on serum peak thyrotropin (TSH) levels after recombinant human TSH administration. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:1319-1322

652.     Montesano T, Durante C, Attard M, Crocetti U, Meringolo D, Bruno R, Tumino S, Rubello D, Al-Nahhas A, Colandrea M, Maranghi M, Travascio L, Ronga G, Torlontano M 2007 Age influences TSH serum levels after withdrawal of l-thyroxine or rhTSH stimulation in patients affected by differentiated thyroid cancer. Biomed Pharmacother 61:468-471

653.     Braverman L, Kloos RT, Law B Jr, Kipnes M, Dionne M, Magner J 2008 Evaluation of various doses of recombinant human thyrotropin in patients with multinodular goiters. Endoc Pract 14:832-839

654.     Over R, Nsouli-Maktabi H, Burman KD, Jonklaas J 2010 Age modifies the response to recombinant human thyrotropin. Thyroid 20:1377-1384

655.     Schlumberger M, Charbord P, Fragu P, Lumbroso J, C P, Tubiana M 1980 Circulating thyrotropin and thyroid hormones in patients with metastases of differentiated thyroid carcinoma: relationship to serum thyrotropin levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 51:513-519

656.     Feldt-Rasmussen U, Petersen PH, Date J, Madsen CM 1980 Sequential changes in serum thyroglobulin (Tg) and its autoantibodies (TgAb) following subtotal thyroidectomy of patients with preoperatively detectable TgAb. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 12:29-38

657.     Rotman-Pikielny P, Reynolds JC, Barker WC, Yen PM, Skarulis MC, Sarlis NJ 2000 Recombinant human thyrotropin for the diagnosis and treatment of a highly functional metastatic struma ovarii. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:237-244

658.     Machens A, Holzhausen HJ, Dralle H 2005 The prognostic value of primary tumor size in papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma. Cancer 103:2269-2273

659.     Passler C, Scheuba C, Prager G, Kaczirek K, Kaserer K, Zettinig G, Niederle B 2004 Prognostic factors of papillary and follicular thyroid cancer: differences in an iodine-replete endemic goiter region. Endocr Relat Cancer 11:131-139

660.     Randolph GW, Duh QY, Heller KS, LiVolsi VA, Mandel SJ, Steward DL, Tufano RP, Tuttle RM 2012 The prognostic significance of nodal metastases from papillary thyroid carcinoma can be stratified based on the size and number of metastatic lymph nodes, as well as the presence of extranodal extension. Thyroid 22:1144-1152

661.     Rosário PW, de Faria S, Bicalho L, Alves MF, Borges MA, Purisch S, Padrão EL, Rezende LL, Barroso AL 2005 Ultrasonographic differentiation between metastatic and benign lymph nodes in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Ultrasound Med 24:1385-1389

662.     Pacini F, Fugazzola L, Lippi F, Ceccarelli C, Centoni R, Miccoli P, Elisei R, Pinchera A 1992 Detection of thyroglobulin in fine needle aspirates of nonthyroidal neck masses: a clue to the diagnosis of metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 74:1401-1404

663.     Uruno T, Miyauchi A, Shimizu K, Tomoda C, Takamura Y, Ito Y, Miya A, Kobayashi K, Matsuzuka F, Amino N, Kuma K 2005 Usefulness of thyroglobulin measurement in fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid cancer. World J Surg 29:483-485

664.     Boi F, Baghino G, Atzeni F, Lai ML, Faa G, Mariotti S 2006 The diagnostic value for differentiated thyroid carcinoma metastases of thyroglobulin (Tg) measurement in washout fluid from fine-needle aspiration biopsy of neck lymph nodes is maintained in the presence of circulating anti-Tg antibodies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:1364-1369

665.     Snozek CL, Chambers EP, Reading CC, Sebo TJ, Sistrunk JW, Singh RJ, Grebe SK 2007 Serum thyroglobulin, high-resolution ultrasound, and lymph node thyroglobulin in diagnosis of differentiated thyroid carcinoma nodal metastases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:4278-4281

666.     Bruno R, Giannasio P, Chiarella R, Capula C, Russo D, Filetti S, Costante G 2009 Identification of a neck lump as a lymph node metastasis from an occult contralateral papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid: key role of thyroglobulin assay in the fine-needle aspirate. Thyroid 19:531-533

667.     Cunha N, Rodrigues F, Curado F, Ilhéu O, Cruz C, Naidenov P, Rascão MJ, Ganho J, Gomes I, Pereira H, Real O, Figueiredo P, Campos B, Valido F 2007 Thyroglobulin detection in fine-needle aspirates of cervical lymph nodes: a technique for the diagnosis of metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur J Endocrinol 157:101-107

668.     Suh YJ, Son EJ, Moon HJ, Kim EK, Han KH, Kwak JY 2012 Utility of Thyroglobulin Measurements in Fine-needle Aspirates of Space Occupying Lesions in the Thyroid Bed after Thyroid Cancer Operations. Thyroid 23:in press

669.     Cappelli C, Pirola I, De Martino E, Gandossi E, Cimino E, Samoni F, Agosti B, Rosei EA, Casella C, Castellano M 2013 Thyroglobulin measurement in fine-needle aspiration biopsy of metastatic lymph nodes after rhTSH stimulation. Head Neck 35:E21-23

670.     Boi F, Maurelli I, Pinna G, Atzeni F, Piga M, Lai ML, Mariotti S 2007 Calcitonin measurement in wash-out fluid from fine needle aspiration of neck masses in patients with primary and metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:2115-2118

671.     Abraham D, Gault PM, Hunt J, Bentz J 2009 Calcitonin estimation in neck lymph node fine-needle aspirate fluid prevents misinterpretation of cytology in patients with metastatic medullary thyroid cancer. Thyroid 19:1015-1016

672.     Massaro F, Dolcino M, Degrandi R, Ferone D, Mussap M, Minuto F, Giusti M 2009 Calcitonin assay in wash-out fluid after fine-needle aspiration biopsy in patients with a thyroid nodule and border-line value of the hormone. J Endocrinol Invest 32:308-312

673.     Barzon L, Boscaro M, Pacenti M, Taccaliti A, Palù G 2004 Evaluation of circulating thyroid-specific transcripts as markers of thyroid cancer relapse. Int J Cancer 110:914-920

674.     Verburg FA, Lips CJ, Lentjes EG, Klerk Jd J 2004 Detection of circulating Tg-mRNA in the follow-up of papillary and follicular thyroid cancer: how useful is it? Br J Cancer 91:1-5

675.     Gupta M, Chia SY 2007 Circulating thyroid cancer markers. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 14:383-388

676.     Ringel MD, Ladenson PW, Levine MA 1998 Molecular diagnosis of residual and recurrent thyroid cancer by amplification of thyroglobulin messenger ribonucleic acid in peripheral blood. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:4435-4442

677.     Biscolla RP, Cerutti JM, Maciel RM 2000 Detection of recurrent thyroid cancer by sensitive nested reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction of thyroglobulin and sodium/iodide symporter messenger ribonucleic acid transcripts in peripheral blood. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:3623-3627

678.     Chinnappa P, Taguba L, Arciaga R, Faiman C, Siperstein A, Mehta AE, Reddy SK, Nasr C, Gupta MK 2004 Detection of thyrotropin-receptor messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) and thyroglobulin mRNA transcripts in peripheral blood of patients with thyroid disease: sensitive and specific markers for thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:3705-3709

679.     Barbosa GF, Milas M 2008 Peripheral thyrotropin receptor mRNA as a novel marker for differentiated thyroid cancer diagnosis and surveillance. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 8:1415-1424

680.     Ringel MD 2004 Editorial: molecular detection of thyroid cancer: differentiating “signal” and “noise” in clinical assays. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:29-32

681.     Chia SY, Milas M, Reddy SK, Siperstein A, Skugor M, Brainard J, Gupta MK 2007 Thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid measurement in blood as a marker for circulating thyroid cancer cells and its role in the preoperative diagnosis of thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:468-475

682.     Kaufmann S, Schmutzler C, Schomburg L, Körber C, Luster M, Rendl J, Reiners C, Köhrle J 2004 Real time RT-PCR analysis of thyroglobulin mRNA in peripheral blood in patients with congenital athyreosis and with differentiated thyroid carcinoma after stimulation with recombinant human thyrotropin. Endocr Regul 38:41-49

683.     Chelly J, Concordet JP, Kaplan JC, Kahn A 1989 Illegitimate transcription: transcription of any gene in any cell type. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:2617-2621

684.     Ghossein RA, Bhattacharya S 2000 Molecular detection and characterisation of circulating tumour cells and micrometastases in solid tumours. Eur J Cancer 36:1681-1694

685.     Savagner F, Rodien P, Reynier P, Rohmer V, Bigorgne JC, Malthiery Y 2002 Analysis of Tg transcripts by real-time RT-PCR in the blood of thyroid cancer patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:635-639

686.     Elisei R, Vivaldi A, Agate L, Molinaro E, Nencetti C, Grasso L, Pinchera A, Pacini F 2004 Low specificity of blood thyroglobulin messenger ribonucleic acid assay prevents its use in the follow-up of differentiated thyroid cancer patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:33-39

687.     Denizot A, Delfino C, Dutour-Meyer A, Fina F, Ouafik L 2003 Evaluation of quantitative measurement of thyroglobulin mRNA in the follow-up of differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 13:867-872

688.     Amakawa M, Kato R, Kameko F, Maruyama M, Tajiri J 2008 Thyroglobulin mRNA expression in peripheral blood lymphocytes of healthy subjects and patients with thyroid disease. Clin Chim Acta 390:97-103

689.     Sellitti DF, Akamizu T, Doi SQ, Kim GH, Kariyil JT, Kopchik JJ, Koshiyama H 2000 Renal expression of two ‘thyroid-specific’ genes: thyrotropin receptor and thyroglobulin. Exp Nephrol 8:235-243

690.     Bojunga J, Roddiger S, Stanisch M, Kusterer K, Kurek R, Renneberg H, Adams S, Lindhorst E, Usadel KH, Schumm-Draeger PM 2000 Molecular detection of thyroglobulin mRNA transcripts in peripheral blood of patients with thyroid disease by RT-PCR. Br J Cancer 82:1650-1655

691.     Endo T, Kobayashi T 2008 Thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor in brown adipose tissue is involved in the regulation of thermogenesis. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 295:E514-518

692.     Zhang W, Tian LM, Han Y, Ma HY, Wang LC, Guo J, Gao L, Zhao JJ 2009 Presence of thyrotropin receptor in hepatocytes: not a case of illegitimate transcription. J Cell Mol Med Jan 28. [Epub ahead of print]

693.     Cianfarani F, Baldini E, Cavalli A, Marchioni E, Lembo L, Teson M, Persechino S, Zambruno G, Ulisse S, Odorisio T, D’Armiento M 2010 TSH receptor and thyroid-specific gene expression in human skin. J Invest Dermatol 130:93-101

694.     Despres N, Grant AM 1998 Antibody interference in thyroid assays: a potential for clinical misinformation. Clin Chem 44:440-454

695.     Covinsky M, Laterza O, Pfeifer JD, Farkas-Szallasi T, Scott MG 2000 Lamda antibody to Esherichia coli produces false-positive results in multiple immunometric assays. Clin Chem 46:1157-1161

696.     Ross HA, Menheere PP 2008 Interference from heterophilic antibodies in seven current TSH assays. Ann Clin Biochem 45:616

697.     Valdes R, Miller JJ 1992 Increasing the specificity of immunoassays. J Clin Immunoassay 15:87-96

698.     Sturgeon CM, Viljoen A 2011 Analytical error and interference in immunoassay: minimizing risk. Ann Clin Biochem 48:418-432

699.     Miller JJ, Valdes R 1992 Methods for calculating crossreactivity in immunoassays. J Clin Immunoassay 15:97-107

700.     Ochi Y, Nagamune T, Nakajima Y, Ishida M, Kajita Y, Hachiya T, Ogura H 1989 Anti-TSH antibodies in Graves’ disease and their failure to interact with TSH receptor antibodies. Acta Endocrinol 120:773-777

701.     Premachandra BN, Blumenthal HT 1967 Abnormal binding of thyroid hormone in sera from patients with Hashimoto’s disease. J Clin Endocrinol 27:931-936

702.     Staeheli V, Vallotton MB, Burger A 1975 Detection of human anti-thyroxine and anti-triiodothyronine antibodies in different thyroid conditions. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 41:669-675

703.     Beck-Peccoz P, Romelli PB, Cattaneo MG, Faglia G, White EL, Barlow JW, Stockigt JR 1984 Evaluation of free Thyroxine methods in the presence of iodothyronine-binding autoantibodies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 58:736-739

704.     Sakata S, Nakamura S, Miura K 1985 Autoantibodies against thyroid hormones or iodothyronine. Implications in diagnosis, thyroid function, treatment and pathogenesis. Ann Intern Med 103:579-589

705.     Sakata S, Takuno H, Nagai K, Kimata Y, Maekawa H, Yamamoto M, al e 1991 Anti-bovine thyrotropin autoantibodies in patients with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, subacute thyroiditis, and systemic lupus erythematosus. J Endocrinol Invest 14:123-130

706.     Desai RK, Bredenkamp B, Jialai I, Omar MAK, Rajput MC, Joubert SM 1988 Autoantibodies to Thyroxin and Triiodothyronine. Clin Chem 34:944-946

707.     Akamizu T, Mori T, Kasagi K, al e 1987 Anti-TSH antibody with high specificity to human TSH in sera from a patient with Graves’ disease: Its isolation from, and interaction with, TSH receptor antibodies. Clin Endocrinol 26:311-320

708.     John R, Henley R, Shankland D 1990 Concentrations of free Thyroxin and free Triiodothyronine in serum of patients with Thyroxin- and Triiodothyronine-binding autoantibodies. Clin Chem 36:470-473

709.     Ginsberg J, Segal D, Ehrlich RM, Walfish PG 1978 Inappropriate triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) radioimmunoassay levels secondary to circulating thyroid hormone autoantibodies. Clin Endocrinol 8:133-139

710.     Norden AGM, Jackson RA, Norden LE, Griffin AJ, Barnes MA, Little JA 1997 Misleading results for immunoassays of serum free thyroxine in the presence of rheumatoid factor. Clin Chem 43:957-962

711.     Kaplan IV, Levinson SS 1999 When is a heterophile antibody not a heterophile antibody? When it is an antibody against a specific immunogen. Clin Chem 45:616-618

712.     Choi WW, Srivatsa S, Ritchie JC 2005 Aberrant thyroid testing results in a clinically euthyroid patient who had received a tumor vaccine. Clin Chem 51:673-675

713.     Kricka LJ 1999 Human anti-animal antibody interference in immunological assays. Clin Chem 45:942-956

714.     Levinson SS 1992 The nature of heterophilic antibodies and their role in immunoassay interference. J Clin Immunoassay 15:108-115

715.     Frost SJ, Hine KR, Firth GB, Wheatley T 1998 Falsely lowered FT4 and raised TSH concentrations in a patient with hyperthyrodism and human anti-mouse monoclonal antibodies. Ann Clin Biochem35

716.     Sapin R, Agin A, Gasser F 2004 Misleading high thyrotropin results obtained with a two-site immunometric assay involving a chimeric antibody. Clin Chem 50:946-948

717.     Bohner J, von Pape KW, Hannes W, Stegmann T 1996 False-negative immunoassay results for cardiac troponin I probably due to circulating troponin I autoantibodies. Clin Chem 42:2046

718.     64 64:234 JA, Honour JW 2006 Unusual results from immunoassays and the role of the clinical endocrinologist. Clin Endocrinol 64:234-244

719.     Cernichow P, Vandalem JL, Hennen G 1981 Transient neonatal hyperthyrotropinemia: a factitious syndrome dure to the presence of heterophilic antibodies in the plasma of infants and their mothers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 53:387-393

720.     Weber TH, Käpyaho KI, Tanner P 1990 Endogenous interference in immunoassays in clinical chemistry. A review. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 201:77-82

721.     Ward G, McKinnon L, Badrick T, Hickman PE 1997 Heterophilic antibodies remain a problem for the immunoassay laboratory. Am J Clin Pathol 108:417-421

722.     Ismail AA, Walker PL, Cawood ML, Barth JH 2002 Interference in immunoassay is an underestimated problem. Ann Clin Biochem 39:366-373

723.     Kricka LJ, Schmerfeld-Pruss D, Kaladas P, Scassellati G, Seccamani E, Courtenay-Luck NS, Kosmas C, al e 1992 Interlaboratory survey of methods for measuring human anti-mouse antibodies. Clin Chem 38:172-173

724.     Kricka LJ, Schmerfeld-Pruss D, Kaladas P, Scassellati G, Seccamani E, Courtenay-Luck NS, Kosmas C, al e 1993 Survey of methods for measuring human anti-mouse antibodies. Clin Chim Acta 215:153-163

725.     Kailajärvi M, Takala T, Grönroos P, Tryding N, Viikari J, Irjala K, Forsström J 2000 Reminders of drug effects on laboratory test results. Clin Chem 46:1395-1400

726.     Stockigt JR, Lim CF 2009 Medications that distort in vitro tests of thyroid function, with particular reference to estimates of serum free thyroxine. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 23:753-767

727.     Berberoğlu M 2003 Drugs and thyroid interaction. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev 1:251-256

728.     Karch FE, Morgan JP, Kubasik NP, al e 1976 Effect of halofenate on serum thyroid hormone determinations in vitro. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 43:26-31

729.     Stockigt JR, Lim CF, Barlow JW, Wynne KN, Mohr VS, Topliss DJ, Hamblin PS, Sabto J 1985 Interaction of furosemide with serum thyroxine-binding sites: in vivo and in vitro studies and comparison with other inhibitors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 60:1025-1031

730.     Samuels MH, Pillote K, Asher D, Nelson JC 2003 Variable effects of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents on thyroid test results. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:5710-5716

731.     Kaptein EM, Spencer CA, Kamiel MB, Nicoloff JT 1980 Prolonged dopamine administration and thyroid hormone economy in normal and critically ill subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 51:387-393

732.     Witzke O, Winterhagen T, Saller B, Roggenbuck U, Lehr I, Philipp T, Mann K, Reinhardt W 2001 Transient stimulatory effects on pituitary-thyroid axis in patients treated with interleukin-2. Thyroid 11:665-670

733.     Stevenson HP, Archbold GPR, Johnston P, Young IS, Sheridan B 1998 Misleading serum free thyroxine results during low molecular weight heparin treatment. Clin Chem 44:1002-1007

734.    Iitaka M, Kawasaki S, Sakurai S, Hara Y, Kuriyama R, Yamanaka K, Kitahama s, Miura S, Kawakami Y, Katayama S 1998 Serum substances that interfere with thyroid hormone assays in patients with chronic renal failure. Clin Endocrinol 48:739-746

735.     Ritter D, Stott R, Grant N, Nahm MH 1993 Endogenous antibodies that interfere with Thyroxine fluorescence polarization assay but not with radioimmunoassay or EMIT. Clin Chem 39:508-511

736.     Bowie LJ, Kirkpatrick PB, Dohnal JC 1987 Thyroid-function testing with the TDx: interference from endogenous fluorophore. Clin Chem 33:1467

737.     Huisman JW 1986 Interference by Diflunisal with the FETI method for serum thyroxine. Ann Clin Biochem 23:223-224

738.     Lazarus JH 2009 Lithium and thyroid. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 23:723-733

739.     Friedrich-Rust M, Theobald J, Zeuzem S, Bojunga J 2009 Thyroid function and changes in ultrasound morphology during antiviral therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Viral Hepat 16:168-177

740.     Tanda ML, Bogazzi F, Martino E, Bartalena L 2008 Amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis: something new to refine the initial diagnosis? Eur J Endocrinol 159:359-361

741.     Bogazzi F, Bartalena L, Dell’Unto E, Tomisti L, Rossi G, Pepe P, Tanda ML, Grasso L, Macchia E, Aghini-Lombardi F, Pinchera A, Martino E 2007 Proportion of type 1 and type 2 amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis has changed over a 27-year period in Italy. Clin Endocrinol 67:533-537

742.     Mandac JC, Chaudhry S, Sherman KE, Tomer Y 2006 The clinical and physiological spectrum of interferon-alpha induced thyroiditis: toward a new classification. Hepatology 43:661-672

743.     Van Lente F 1997 Methodology and subspecialty consolidation in the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem 43:11-12

744.     Lai DJ, Sokoll LJ, Chan DW 1998 Automated chemiluminescent immunoassay analyzers. J Clin Ligand Assay 21:377-385

745.     Soldin OP, Hilakivi-Clarke L, Weiderpass E, Soldin SJ 2004 Trimester-specific reference intervals for thyroxine and triiodothyronine in pregnancy in iodine-sufficient women using isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry and immunoassays. Clin Chim Acta 349:181-189

746.     Felder RA 1997 Modular laboratory robotics and automation. JIFCC 9:56-60

747.    Martel J, Despres N, Ahnadi CE, Lachance JF, Monticello JE, Fink G, Ardemagni A, Banfi G, Tovey J, Dykes P, John R, Jeffery J, Grant AM 2000 Comparative multicentre study of a panel of thyroid tests using different automated immunoassay platforms and specimens at high risk of antibody interference. Clin Chem Lab Med 38:785-793

748.     Kricka LJ, Nozaki O, Wildin P 1994 Micromechanics and nanotechnology: Implications and applications inthe clinical laboratory. JIFCC 6:54-59

749.     Ekins R, Chu F 1997 Immunoassay and other ligand assays: Present status and future trends. JIFCC 9:100-109